Top Tweets for #EveryVoteMustCount

🚨We Can End the Electoral College by Congressional Reapportionment - It doesn't require an amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Electoral College has long been a focal point of criticism by many who believe that it undermines American democracy in favor of minority tyranny. Amidst discussions of reforming it, there lies a pragmatic yet underexplored approach—#reapportiondemocracy Reapportioning the seats in the House of Representatives. The static count of 435 House seats, unchanged since 1911, stands juxtaposed against the dynamic growth of the American population over the century. This disparity nudges the narrative towards the concept of reapportionment, an avenue to potentially neutralize the effect of the Electoral College and amplify a more diverse range of voices. Let's delve into three hypothetical scenarios of reapportionment—a proportional-to-population increase, medium, and moderate moderate—exploring their potential impacts on the 2020 Presidential Election and the composition of the 2022 Congress. Scenario 1: Proportional-to-Population Reapportionment (see math simplification below) Aligning the seat apportionment with population growth could further harmonize the electoral system. Under this scenario, California's electoral votes could soar to 70, and Texas's to 49. This could potentially lead to the Democratic Party's consolidation of the presidency and Congress in the short term, while strengthening the democratic fabric by making it far more representative in the long term. By scaling reapportionment to changes in the US population, we can permanently neuter the Electoral College, fostering a direct reflection of the nation's demographic evolution in its governance structures. Scenario 2: Medium Reapportionment (677 Seats) A medium approach could significantly reshape the electoral landscape. In this scenario, California could see its electoral votes rise to 63, while Texas could have 45. This reshuffling of the deck could provide a platform for a broader spectrum of voices to be heard, enriching the democratic dialogue. Scenario 3: Moderate Reapportionment (550 Seats) A moderate increase in House seats could subtly shift the electoral map. For instance, populous states like California and Texas might see an increase in their electoral votes, with California going from 55 to 59 and Texas from 38 to 41. This shift offers a potential path to neutralize the disproportionate influence of certain states within the Electoral College, thereby bringing a fresh breeze of diverse perspectives to the halls of Congress. Short-term Impact on the Presidency and Congress In the short term, reapportionment favoring populous states may benefit the Democratic Party, given its strong urban base. The presidency and the House might trend strongly Democrat, compelling the Republicans to reform or adjust their strategies to regain competitive ground. This could also create a political vacuum, potentially giving rise to new parties or coalitions. Over time, as parties adapt to the new electoral landscape, a new equilibrium might be established, but the initial phase could see a pronounced shift in the political and partisan dynamics at both the presidential and congressional levels. Long-term Impact In the long term, a more representative Congress and a rebalanced Electoral College might lead to a healthier political discourse and competition, potentially fostering a more dynamic and responsive two-party system or even enabling the emergence of third parties. As parties adapt to the new electoral landscape, they might become more inclusive and policy-focused to appeal to a broader electorate. Additionally, a continuously evolving reapportionment process aligned with population changes could ensure that the American political system remains reflective of its demographic diversity, promoting a more balanced and representative democracy. The U.S. Senate Reapportionment would not affect the Senate as each state, regardless of its population, is allocated two Senate seats as mandated by the U.S. Constitution. The idea behind reapportionment is to adjust the number of seats in the House of Representatives based on population changes, which in turn affects the Electoral College since a state's electoral votes are the sum of its Senate and House seats. The Senate's structure is fixed and would remain unchanged unless amended in the Constitution. Retweet and share this article with the hashtag #reapportiondemocracy, and let's collectively explore this avenue to a better democracy.