Top Tweets for #FlynnNetworks

Did you actually read this? I just did, and outside of the story that was copied and pasted from a local paper, the rest is just allegations without evidence. Holmseth claims to have mountains of evidence but none is cited or produced. Regarding your claim that "Bondi helped the CIA/Mossad cover up their child trafficking and kiddy porn operations," there is no evidence anywhere in the linked document to support that claim. The closest it comes is William Staub, who Holmseth alleges to be a child trafficker (without providing evidence to support the claim) claimed to him that he is an "informant" to Pam Bondi. There is no other alleged tie anywhere in this LONG blog page between Bondi and anything else having to do with this story. Holmseth does not say that he verified Staub's claim of being an informant to Bondi by any other means - he just took this alleged child trafficker's word for it. And your claim that Bondi was involved in a cover up? The basis of that claim is she didn't return Holmseth's calls. Holmseth does not have a stellar reputation among effective people because he tends to make huge claims without sufficiently backing them up. Just like in this blog page. I'm not saying he's wrong or right. I suspect he is partly right, partly psychologically affected by the things that appear to have happened to him, and partly wrong. The bottom line is we are not given a clear evidentiary path to make that conclusion. Claiming that Bondi, as FL AG, was involved in a child trafficking cover up because she did not return Holmseth's calls is baseless, defamatory, and deliberately inflammatory. This is a PSYOP.