Top Tweets for #GenCost
Renewables still cheapest in CSIRO’s revised modelling | @joseph_brookes
#Energy #CSIRO #GenCost
https://t.co/qm5RrhOn0g
Lets hope Aidan gets back online soon.
Has Aidan ruffled too many feathers about #gencost in #auspol recently? #conspiracytheory. (!)
AIDAN MORRISON HAS BEEN HACKED.
Please do not interact with his account.
He has confirmed this with me.

“For the seventh year in a row, #renewables have the lowest cost range of any new electricity generation”.
#energy #wind #solar #FossilFuels #nuclear
#CSIRO #AEMO #GenCost #auspol
https://t.co/eQHUZcmVSa
CSIRO's draft #GenCost report finds nuclear has no unique cost advantage over renewables, citing long lead times & high refurbishment costs. Renewables remain the lowest-cost option for new energy projects in 🇦🇺. Public comments open until Feb 11.
https://t.co/EMbQrF2NXo
If you want to know where the fraud and scientific malpractice is in the @CSIRO #GENCost report, look no further than the assumptions it makes on “average time it runs at full capacity”
Anything less than 93% is fraudulent input data. They’re giving Solar/Wind ‘right of way’

In collaboration with @AEMO_Energy, we've released the GenCost 2024-25 Draft Report.
The report found firmed renewables remain the lowest cost range of new build electricity technology.
Read the report and share your feedback by 11 February, 2025: https://t.co/AwWIupIrKU
☢️nuke bros hating on #GenCost's cost estimate for SMRs might be interested in this comparison.
2024 costs:
• @TVAnews' estimate of @gehnuclear's BWRX-300: A$25,996/kW
• @CSIRO's estimate of @NuScale_Power's VOYGR-6: A$26,316/kW
very different reactors… very similar costs.
@Bowenchris Chris how expensive is this power going to be? As your beloved #gencost report says offshore wind is more expensive than nuclear? #auspol
The greatest lie told to Australians is that “wind and solar are the cheapest forms of energy”.
Politicians and journalists, who should know better, are using a report of models from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation's (CSIRO) #GenCost to try to justify this claim.
In recent decades, #CSIRO has completely destroyed its once stellar reputation for scientific research. It has now allowed its name to be used for political agendas rather than real science.
The underlying assumptions and inputs used for the GenCost model must be subject to scrutiny. I voiced these comments in support of a Senate Inquiry to do that, which Labor and the greens voted down.
What are they trying to hide?
Earlier last week it was Senator David Fawcett questioning hashtag #GenCost. #auspol
Also last week, Senator @SenatorRennick was questioning the @CSIRO on GenCost in Senate Estimates. Now heading into a Senate hearing, although you don't know exactly what you will get asked, given the public interest in GenCost the CSIRO were well on notice they would be asked questions on GenCost.
Both of the relevant people who could have answered the questions were on annual leave? Recommend you watch the video and see for yourself!
Maybe the right people could have provided reasonable answers to these questions, but when the Government agencies refuse to answer relatively simple and reasonable questions; it only serves to drive further distrust in the numbers.
#uranium
It’s always spin over substance!
1. The Head of the CSIRO is clueless. He clearly only answers questions that suit his narrative and takes everything else on notice. Whatever happened to accountability in answering questions.
2. Why bother turning up to estimates if you aren’t going to bring your subject matter experts - especially in regard to their GenCost report which is used by useful idiots like Chris Bowen to justify their lies.
3. The CSIRO is misleading the Australian public by overstating the capacity of Windfarms. They have a capacity of 30% not 50%. This understates their costs by 40%.
4. Assuming Nuclear and Coal have an average capacity of 60% is misleading. If allowed to run 24 hours a day without being turned down for solar in the middle of the day their capacity can be 90%.
5. By overstating wind and understating coal/nuclear capacity the way they have, coal/nuclear is costed at being 20% more efficient than wind. I.e. 60% over 50% instead of 300% more efficient. I.e. 90% over 30%.
6. The net result of this is that efficiency of baseload power is understated by 15 times in relation to Wind power.
7. Storage costs are completely ignored in costings, especially in regard to locating and building pumped hydro. The CSIRO have no idea where the pumped hydro is going to go.
The Net Zero fantasy is going to destroy this country.
#auspol
***Senator calls for Independent Inquiry into @CSIRO #GenCost*** #uranium #auspol $cxu
Australians have been constantly told by @Bowenchris that the CSIRO GenCost report (concluding mass renewables is the cheapest path forward for our energy policy) is beyond reproach. But he doesn't want there to be an independent inquiry into it to test that assumption.
This Parliamentary speech by Senator David Fawcett is fascinating! A bit long (15 mins); but I highly recommend taking the time to review it.
Look forward to discussing your comments below!
https://t.co/FbCiwvs4HK
Australia is falling behind as the globe goes Nuclear.
#Outsiders
"The CSIRO #GenCost report is a con, it's worse than that, it's actually a form of fascism. It is put together by an economist with a masters degree and a person who is a proponent of wave power"
Labor's Green dream wounding the nation.
"I think it is possible that BMW will move out of Germany in the next five years because Munich now is a little bubble of failed (energy) plans, which is the AEMO plan.
My own view is that AEMO should be completely restructured, it should be brought back into the real world." Dr Adi Paterson former ANSTO CEO.
@rowandean @PeterDutton_MP #auspol
#Gencost. How does it change for ⚛️?
Post @LiberalAus announcement ⚛️ would be a govt entity, we need to adjust cost of capital to 4.35% in Gencost.
With 80y life, & 82% low end CF the 2030 range, pre Coal -> ⚛️ cost reductions is 97-108.
If we assume @INL coal conversion savings of 25%
Large Scale ⚛️ 2030 LCOE is 73-81.
Significantly cheaper than offshore 💨
Even pre cost savings, this is cheaper than any of the VRE mix scenarios.
A quick🧵on today’s Gencost. Nuclear is much cheaper.
First, well done @CSIRO for splitting out small and Large. A step in the right direction Well done for listening. This was something I’d personally requested, and glad to see others had too.
Lets jump into the model.
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
teeNager
CalamityFund
Seen from United States
CHRISGENOVESE
Seen from United States
momson filter:videos
Arrimon
Seen from United Kingdom
페티시
Seen from Korea
stlbored
Seen from United States
BirthdayGiftFromMeToMe
Seen from United States
caught jerking off
Seen from Vietnam
CASBAH_Japan
Seen from United States
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.8M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
119.2M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
111.3M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
97.8M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.2M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
91.1M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
88M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
81.9M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
73.4M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
70.5M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
70M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.7M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
64.1M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
63.3M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.9M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
61.1M followers

X 
@x
60.8M followers






















