Top Tweets for #InverseCondemnation

over 2 years ago

Interested in reading the documents filed in Town of Apex v. Rubin, the #EminentDomain / #InverseCondemnation case before the #NC Supreme Court? ⚖️ Here you go: https://t.co/VEWVTUed7i

0

2

1

0

72

almost 3 years ago

The City of Apex requested discretionary review of a unanimous Court of Appeals decision in favor of the landowner, and the NC Supreme Court agreed. #EminentDomain #InverseCondemnation #PropertyRights #PropertyLaw #JustCompensation https://t.co/KCvR9aY2pk

0

3

1

0

122

almost 3 years ago

What we're really looking forward to is another multi-prong test. #Takings jurisprudence is just so cut-and-dry. Straightforward. We need a little nuance! Some excitement! ⚖️ #EminentDomain #Condemnation #InverseCondemnation #PropertyRights #PropertyLaw

Don Pinto @massdirtlaw

almost 3 years ago

This case will have vast implications if SCOTUS squarely decides whether legislative #landuse exactions are exempt from Nollan/Dolan/Koontz: "Supreme Court Case Will Clarify Constitutionality of Permit Exaction Fees" https://t.co/V5AfHRBSUW #propertyrights #takings

0

1

2

0

370

1

2

0

226

LovellLawLLP @Lovell_Law

about 3 years ago

Here's what you need to know about #InverseCondemnation: https://t.co/q0d64b0gu7 #BusinessLitigation #PropertyOwners

0

9

0

29

over 3 years ago

4th Circuit case in our backyard: Epcon Homestead, LLC v. Town of Chapel Hill: when does the SOL on an exactions takings claim begin to run? 🏘️🏘️🏘️💸💰💸 #EminentDomain #InverseCondemnation #JustCompensation #PropertyRights

over 3 years ago

CA4: Exactions Takings Claim Accrues When Owner Knows Of The Demand, Not When It Paid https://t.co/79xxNJ8Jxj

0

2

0

370

1

3

1

0

263

over 3 years ago

Great read on the recent Federal Circuit Rails-To-Trails decision 🚂🛤️🏃#PropertyRights #EminentDomain #InverseCondemnation

Infrastructure Junkies @IJpod

over 3 years ago

Guest Post - @PacificLegal's Kady Valois: "How The West Was Won: Easements!" Recreational trails aren't "railroad purposes" https://t.co/nuFFsZnBQ0

0

2

0

311

0

2

1

0

188

Charles McFarland

@mcfarlandpllc

almost 5 years ago

Can a governmental entity buy land subject to deed restriction and just ignore the restrictions without having to pay compensation to the owner of the restrictions? No. "The laws of England. . . " #inversecondemnation

mcfarlandpllc's tweet photo. Can a governmental entity buy land subject to deed restriction and just ignore the restrictions without having to pay compensation to the owner of the restrictions?

No.

"The laws of England. . . "

#inversecondemnation https://t.co/fEGiw654rU

1

2

1

0

over 5 years ago

Happy Sunday, #InfrastructureJunkies! Can you guess the topic of our upcoming episode? #oysters #inversecondemnation

0

4

2

0

Infrastructure Junkies @IJpod

over 5 years ago

Hey IJs! Our own @rightofwaydave & @rightofwayross are cover models!...sort of. Check out this article about an extremely important case in Virginia! And stay tuned for a deep dive into #oysters on an upcoming episode of the podcast. #inversecondemnation

Ross Greene @rightofwayross

over 5 years ago

Does it count as being on the cover of a magazine if you're out of focus in the background?😂Sure why not! We're on the ✨C O V E R O F A M A G A Z I NE ! ✨ https://t.co/y3aYKpV7lX

0

6

2

0

3

1

0

Ross Greene @rightofwayross

over 5 years ago

As promised, hot off the presses, article about SCOVA's recent ruling in favor of the the alleged condemning authority in an inverse condemnation case regarding leased oyster beds under the Nansemond River. #eminentdomain #inversecondemnation #oysters https://t.co/PTaasmxp8m

0

4

1

0

almost 6 years ago

Follow this thread for a list of proposed Takings Greatest Hits ™️. #EminentDomain #Condemnation #InverseCondemnation #JustCompensation

almost 6 years ago

Crowdsource: if you had to pick just two "takings" cases to teach, which two? Penn Central, Penn Coal, Lucas, Kaiser Aetna, Lingle, Palazzolo, Nollan, Knick, Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Andrus v Allard, etc?

6

3

2

0

2

1

0

almost 6 years ago

This case touches on a lot of our favorite things: #Oysters! #EnvironmentalLaw! #PropertyRights! #InverseCondemnation! ⚖️📜🦪

Michael G.Colantuono @mcolantuono

almost 6 years ago

11/4/2020, 9am: Virginia SCT to hear arguments in inverse condemnation case about nature of property interest in state-granted lease, public trust, enviro law & whether to revisit Darling v. City of Newport News, 249 U.S. 540 (1919). h/t @BenmingZhang @WMPropRtsFellow

invcondemnation's tweet photo. 11/4/2020, 9am: Virginia SCT to hear arguments in inverse condemnation case about nature of property interest in state-granted lease, public trust, enviro law & whether to revisit Darling v. City of Newport News, 249 U.S. 540 (1919). h/t @BenmingZhang @WMPropRtsFellow https://t.co/w6gkYGxdGG

1

4

2

0

2

1

0

about 6 years ago

SCOCA ruled that CCP 1260.040 motions limited to eminent domain, not inverse condemnation. Our case. We'll have a blog post out today or tomorrow. Weiss v. CalTrans #localgov #inversecondemnation

0

5

1

0

about 6 years ago

HB 1174 would allow NC business owners to bring an #InverseCondemnation claim based on losses incurred during a government shutdown. #EminentDomain

about 6 years ago

NC Considering Constitutional Amendment: Compensation For Emergency Shut-Downs https://t.co/2fwpj8zhX6

0

3

1

0

Ben Rubin @BenZRubin

over 6 years ago

Nossaman’s Brad Kuhn and Paul Fuller of Allied Public Risk preview their panel on inverse condemnation, part of Nossaman's 2020 California Eminent Domain Seminars in San Francisco on March 25th and Orange County on March 31st. #inversecondemnation https://t.co/FW4ldkw2yM

0

2

1

0

Michael Wara @MichaelWWara

over 6 years ago

Sometimes #NCDOT construction projects cause significant offsite damages. Depending on the specific facts, sometimes these damages may arise to the level of an #InverseCondemnation. #EminentDomain #JustCompensation https://t.co/Qd4pztqYGK

0

1

0

almost 7 years ago

(I think) it would mean that IOU is still liable (because #inversecondemnation) but that ratepayers would be responsible for all losses (because following direction from the CPUC = prudent, so recoverable in rates). But, due to AB1054, Wildfire Fund would pay (until exhausted).

Kim-Mai Cutler

@kimmaicutler

almost 7 years ago

What does that do to liability if the state says no to a shutdown and a giant wildfire ensues?

4

20

1

2

0

4

0