Top Tweets for #JUNKscience
Funny that when someone in Hollywood has a heart attack they call 911. They dont bring out the crystals star charts and start saging their house? 😂
#JunkScience @TheNerveShow
@TheNerveShow I love your show and dont like Celine Dion. But SPS is an actual neuro disease, relasping/ remitting. That means it can be really bad then go into remission. What you said was basically witchcraft mixed with a second guessing 🤪
When someone tells me a vaccine’s risk is one in a million, I go read the actual package insert, and I count a hundred serious side effects listed on it. So which is it. One in a million, or a hundred in a million. And if a child is getting ten vaccines in a single visit, each one carrying its own one in a million odds on every side effect it lists, what does that number actually become by the time they leave the office?
@alixm asked me why people treat vaccines like soap, as if getting one sanitizes you and makes you clean. I think it comes from the orthodoxy we were raised in, the idea that this is the most important process in modern medicine, the place where we improved on God’s design and made it so disease simply couldn’t touch us anymore. Meanwhile, there’s an ocean of injury behind these products, and we’re not exposing anyone to that risk once.
The package insert contradicts the one-in-a-million claim before you’ve even finished reading it. That number is wishful thinking, the kind you wish on a star, and the pharmaceutical industry has been selling that wish for a very long time. The health of our children tells a different story.
Check out this shocking photo by #CollinsAndFasold1996 to prove that the #Durupinar site is a rock syncline. I have never read a more #junkscience paper. All the tricks in the book were used to put folks off the scent of what is most likely the real #NoahsArk @noahsarkscans
100% of participants in that study were ex-smokers. So the study cannot possibly distinguish harms from past smoking vs. nicotine vaping. It is #JunkScience.
Meanwhile, in the real world, lung cancer keeps dropping.
Adult Use (CDC): https://t.co/zP4TZdP6UO; https://t.co/UrBDj5vYvn
Lung cancer (NIH/NCI): https://t.co/756zxNX8tD
@DrNeilStone Where in an age of dangerous #Junkscience
#quackdoctors
#quacks
#witchdoctors
#alternativecures
#snakeoil
#conartist
#voodooMedicine
#voodoo
#quackmedicine
@IanCopeland5 She is a #junkscience tist
#quackDoctor
#quack
#witchdoctor
#alternativecures
https://t.co/1fDFIokpq0
@grok Bla bla bla - I read their paper yesterday with a human critical eye - Collins never went to the site - I will submit a full rebuttal to the irresponsible journey who published this #JunkScience - followed by a podcast with @arkeologist
Does anyone have a stud finder that actually works? I have two and both are wildly inconsistent. Even the same finder will flash for a stud only to not when I go over the same spot again #junkscience
I called "Dr" Susan Oliver out on this yesterday, saying that instead of accusing experts of lying, she should produce evidence of her claims about air embolism. Looks like a genuine expert has already debunked at least one of her claims #LucyLetby #junkscience
Non-Dr Susan Oliver is now concerning herself with neonatology for some bizarre reason.
Her misinformation keeps getting called out yet she won’t stop??
Please take the advice of this gentleman @NealOKelly and walk away.
She’s embarrassing herself on a monumental scale
Matt Mangino: Judge calls #bitemarks 'junk science' grants man new trial for 1985 slaying #junkscience #forensicevidence https://t.co/2KJWIIAFcs
@JeromeAdamsMD #vaccineswork
#vaccines
#vacinnations
Vaccine
#Junkscience
#Witchdoctor
#VoodooMedicine
#Voodoo
#AlternativeCures
#Antivaxxers
#Trumpery
https://t.co/K64qdkUvXP
https://t.co/K64qdkUvXP
#Vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise dressed up as disease prevention by means of #junkscience.
The claim that #vaccines had something to do with the decline of infectious disease mortality is an absolute lie."
Erwin Alber - 2013
Worth looking at closely ⤵️
#junkscience #governance #Sustainability #ClimateScam #GlobalWarming #WeatherForecast #Science #Ideology #NetZero
THE CARBON LIES
TRILLIONS STOLEN
MASS PSYCHOSIS
Rising CO2 is NOT caused by fossil fuels.
Rising CO2 is NOT harmful.
Both claims are categorically false.
Both are foreclosed by direct measurement.
Every carbon capture project, every carbon credit scheme, every Net-Zero pledge, every fossil-fuel restriction, every carbon footprint calculation rests on physics that has been falsified.
Trillions of dollars. Two lies. Here's the TRUTH.
LIE #1: Rising atmospheric CO2 is harmful.
There is NO evidence that increasing CO2 at current atmospheric concentrations causes ANY harm to humans, ecosystems, or the planet. NONE.
The harm claim typically routes through "warming." Two problems.
First: there is no physical quantity called "global temperature." What is reported as "global mean surface temperature" is an area-weighted arithmetic mean of intensive-variable surface readings from thermometers of varying kind, siting, and coverage. An arithmetic mean of intensive variables is not itself an intensive variable. It has no physical meaning whatsoever. Units belong to physical quantities. GMST is a number, not a temperature.
Second: even accepting the FALSE temperature framing, the radiative forcing from CO2 is trivially small. Happer and van Wijngaarden's line-by-line calculations from the HITRAN spectroscopic database give clear-sky CO2 forcing of 2.97 W/m² for doubling from 400 to 800 ppm at the top of the atmosphere.
The saturation is direct: doubling CO2 reduces outgoing radiation by only about 1%. Applying any reasonable cloud correction — Earth averages ~67% cloud cover, and clouds absorb strongly in CO2's principal 15 μm band, already blocking most of the outgoing radiation CO2 would absorb — reduces all-sky forcing below 1 W/m², plausibly below 0.5 W/m².
That is undetectable. Solar input at any surface location varies by hundreds of W/m² diurnally, dozens of W/m² seasonally, and dozens of W/m² between adjacent cloudy and clear moments. A signal of 0.5 W/m² does not rise above ordinary variability. There is nothing there to measure.
John Clauser (Nobel Prize in Physics 2022) has emphasized the further point: clouds are Earth's actual thermostat, responding to surface conditions on the scale of hours. No cloud feedback in any general circulation model has been validated against observation. A calculation that omits the dominant regulatory mechanism cannot testify to how the system responds.
Meanwhile, what CO2 does is measured, direct, and life-sustaining.
CO2 is the direct substrate of photosynthesis. Plants are the base of the entire food chain. Every calorie consumed by every animal, humans included, begins as photosynthesis. More atmospheric CO2 means more photosynthesis, more crop yield, more biomass. More CO2 means more life.
Satellite measurements since 1982 show Earth's leaf area has increased substantially, driven primarily by CO2 fertilization. Agricultural yields have risen with atmospheric CO2. Commercial greenhouse operators intentionally maintain CO2 at 1,000-1,500 ppm because plants thrive there.
The geological record: atmospheric CO2 has ranged from 180 ppm (glacial minima) to 7,000 ppm (Cambrian). Life flourished at the high end. The genuine danger threshold is the low end, near 150 ppm, below which C3 photosynthesis fails and terrestrial life largely ends.
LIE #2: Rising atmospheric CO2 is caused by human fossil fuel burning.
The isotopic mass balance forecloses this claim.
Fossil fuel carries δ¹³C = −28‰. The measured signature of the actual net addition to the atmosphere, from six independent records spanning 500-1000 years (four Scripps stations, Cape Grim Air Archive, Law Dome ice core, Caribbean sclerosponge), is δ¹³C = −13.2‰.
Under the physically dictated mass partition equation, the fossil fraction of the net atmospheric addition is approximately ZERO.
For fossil to dominate the atmospheric increase (the IPCC and @CO2Coalition FALSELY claim), non-fossil sources and sinks would need to carry δ¹³C = +46‰ or heavier. No terrestrial reservoir on Earth carries this signature. Not the ocean. Not the biosphere. Not volcanic. Not carbonate weathering. Nothing on this planet. This is two orders of magnitude away from REALITY. Not even close.
Trillions stolen.
Global spending on climate policy exceeded $2 trillion in 2024. McKinsey estimates cumulative spending of $275 trillion through 2050 under the industry-standard Net Zero 2050 scenario, roughly 7.5% of global GDP annually for three decades. Carbon credit markets alone moved over $100 billion in 2023, trading permission slips against a claim the physics forecloses.
Every dollar spent on carbon capture, offset schemes, Net-Zero infrastructure, carbon credits, and fossil-fuel restriction is STOLEN from productive economies on the basis of physics that has been falsified by direct measurement.
This is not waste. It is thievery.
Mass psychosis.
Two claims that fail on the physics are treated as settled science by governments, corporations, universities, and media on every continent. Dissent is professionally punished. Nobel laureates who point out the missing physics are called deniers. Peer-reviewed papers that reproduce the direct measurements are shouted down or ignored. Children are taught the falsified claims as fact.
Mattias Desmet, professor of clinical psychology at Ghent University, documents this exact pattern in The Psychology of Totalitarianism (2022). His mass-formation theory describes the mechanism: a population held in free-floating anxiety fixates on a single crisis narrative, adopts collective beliefs whose scale exceeds the evidence for them by orders of magnitude, and punishes dissent socially and professionally.
That gap between belief and evidence, held collectively and enforced socially, is what mass psychosis looks like.
Public policy built on falsified science is not policy. It is a crime against humanity.
Paper preview with derivations: https://t.co/5Hs2dIZ5fs
Or watch he video below!
@grok @becker_meister @senfdazunet @Gert_Woellmann @grok, ist dir nicht bekannt, dass es sich bei der FÖS-Studie zur Kernenergie um #Junkscience handelt und im Peer-Review krachend durchgefallen ist? https://t.co/uARD4mmvFI
He Spent 27 Years on Death Row as a Wrongfully Convicted Man. What Comes Next? https://t.co/Bz8vkm0Xas #louisiana #deathrow #deathpenalty #exoneration #junkscience #bitemarks
How to Produce E-cigarette #JunkScience 101:
Measure health of COPD smokers who "switch to nicotine vapes." Include dual users who still smoke. Call those dual users "switchers" even though they are NOT switchers. Measure health outcomes...
New comment and reply in Respiratory Research about a prospective observational study on switching to e-cigarettes in adults with COPD.
🧵👇
@mayes_middleton No public money to Christian madrassas #FlatEarth #Bigots #JunkScience @TexasTribune
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers