Top Tweets for #JamesAngleton
The Gift of AMSANTA
#JamesAngleton & #JEdgarHoover mounted penetration operation against #LeeHarveyOswald’s Fair Play for Cuba Committee 4 months before #JFKassassination
Doc approved for release 2025 BUT???
@jeffersonmorley #JFKFacts #CIA #FBI #COINTELPRO
https://t.co/j6PKgVfRd3

#LauraLoom is the new #JamesAngleton uncovering moles who have embedded themselves in the intelligence community.

@LauraLoomer #LauraLoom is the new #JamesAngleton uncovering moles who have embedded themselves in the intelligence community.
https://t.co/7FqmFOMDFx
#Angleton deposition in Hunt v. Weberman - why did #JamesAngleton appear? Because he wanted to see if I was #KGB or #DGI agent who figured out who was behind the "Big Event" and not just a hippy garbologist, Dylanologist, Yippie etc. He sat there smoking cigarette after cigarette with his legs crossed and when it came to shaking my hand he squeezed it so hard I had to look and make sure a had a hand left. Unlike the rest of you I met those I accused of being conspirators.

Ep.601 Arrest SOMEONE!!!!, JFK Files, Israel Involvement #DonaldTrump, #PamBondi, #KashPatel, #ShadowGovernment, #JFK, #JFKFiles, #Israel, #Mossaad, #CIA. #EU, #JamesAngleton, #LyndonBJohnson, #KhazarianMafia, #FYP, #ViralVideo https://t.co/70wB5oteBP
CIA suppressed top officer James Jesus Angleton's connection to Israeli intelligence as shown by this newly unredacted JFK assassination records file.
Angleton had subverted JFK's policy of preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons and was praised by Mossad head Meir Amit as "the biggest Zionist of them all". Angleton was also found to have hidden documents from the Warren Commission on the assassination of President Kennedy.
Shortly before he died, Angleton stated "The better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would be promoted... outside of their duplicity, the only thing they had in common was a desire for absolute power."
The file was previously "released" in 2017, 2018 and 2022 in redacted form.

⚠️🚨🇮🇱 🇺🇸 ¡¡¡ARRESTANDO!!!
Los archivos #JFK han revelado que #JamesAngleton, el jefe de #contrainteligencia de la #CIA, mantuvo los lazos clandestinos con la inteligencia #israelí, las concentros que se ocultaron deliberadamente.
¿Por qué se ha retenido esta revelación explosiva hasta ahora?
https://t.co/xZlSdDN9Bg

January 1969: #JamesAngleton of the CI Staff at #CIA asks the #FBI for more information on the members of the committee being put together by #BernardFensterwald (and supported by New Orleans D.A. #JimGarrison) to look into the #JFKassassination.

Forty-five years in between these photographs of retired, reclusive #CIA counterintelligence chief #JamesAngleton: student at Yale (left), 1941, and attending an #OSS veterans’ event (right), 1986.

One of the interesting, under-reported associations in the post-#CIA life and career of #JamesAngleton was his brief but meaningful involvement with the #AmericanSecurityCouncil, with which he promoted a legal defense fund for current or former intelligence personnel caught up in ongoing congressional (or other) investigations of past Agency deeds and misdeeds.
The ASC was a hugely influential, media-savvy lobbying group with a strong right-wing political stance, using print and TV ads to warn about the “missile gap” and advocate for more defense spending by Congress. Not surprisingly, the ASC was popular with former Pentagon brass: the ASC was endorsed by (among others) General #LymanLemnitzer and Admiral #ThomasMoorer. (The ASC had been popular in the Nixon White House too: #ChuckColson was caught up in some controversy when he was found to be distributing copies of “Operation Alert,” a pamphlet the ASC published titled argue that the U.S. was “now number two in strategic military power, “ after the Soviet Union.)
The head of the ASC, former #FBI agent #JohnFisher, raised some eyebrows in 1966 when he established the Freedom Studies Center in Boston, Virginia, a “political warfare school” that hosted talks by (among others) the Cuban-exile leader and #RadioFreeAmericas writer Herminio Portell Vila and General #WilliamWestmoreland.
(Washington Post, 5/12/1977.)

The well-attended funeral service for former #CIA director #AllenDulles, Georgetown Presbyterian Church, February 1969: while DCI #RichardHelms had the duty of escorting Dulles’ widow, it was CI chief #JamesAngleton who carried out the spymaster’s ashes.

Former #CIA CI chief #JamesAngleton isn’t buried in Washington. He’s buried in Morris Hill Cemetery in his hometown, Boise, Idaho.

Former #CIA counterintelligence chief #JamesAngleton died on this date in 1987. He was 69 years old. He left no memoir of his career but his views on U.S.-Soviet relations influenced many authors critical of the Cold War “thaw” in the ‘70s and ‘80s.
Angleton is seen here about a year before his death, at an #OSS veterans reception in Washington, D.C., talking with then-current DCI #WilliamCasey.
(Allentown [Pa.] Morning Call, 5/12/1987.)
![timfattig's tweet photo. Former #CIA counterintelligence chief #JamesAngleton died on this date in 1987. He was 69 years old. He left no memoir of his career but his views on U.S.-Soviet relations influenced many authors critical of the Cold War “thaw” in the ‘70s and ‘80s.
Angleton is seen here about a year before his death, at an #OSS veterans reception in Washington, D.C., talking with then-current DCI #WilliamCasey.
(Allentown [Pa.] Morning Call, 5/12/1987.)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNT_9PFaYAAd20d.jpg)
In 1985, former #CIA CI chief #JamesAngleton wrote one of his last public comments on the defector wars of the ‘50s and ‘60s, this brief review of the book New Lies for Old by the significant #KGB defector #AnatoliyGolitsyn.

Three pages from Clearing the Air, the 1977 book by newsman Daniel Schorr. There’s quite a bit here about the internal, and external, battles of the #CIA, and passages about the noisy ouster of CI chief #JamesAngleton by DCI #WilliamColby, in the midst of various congressional probes into past Agency misdeeds. Then there’s this:
“Routed out of bed by a call from my office, I looked in the telephone book for Angleton, whom I had never heard of before, and drove to his home in North Arlington, Virginia…”
By the mid ‘70s veteran broadcast journalist Dan Schorr— an Army Intelligence veteran during WWII, who spent decades on the Cold War beat for CBS News— had never heard of James Angleton?
If this is a lie, and it must be, to what end is Schorr telling this lie in 1977?

August 1964: the #CIA’s top Soviet analyst, #DavidMurphy, writes a long memo to the CI chief, #JamesAngleton, to explain the importance of #AnatoliyGolitsyn, a #KGB defector, in taking apart claims made by a more recent defector named #YuriNosenko.
Even at this comparatively early date, Murphy was convinced that Nosenko’s defection was a misdirect on the part of the Soviets and that Golitsyn would be the instrument for uncovering that. “…[A]lthough his current comments do not provide much that is new,” Murphy wrote, “Golitsyn himself has always been a key to our understanding of the Nosenko case.”
Later in the same report Murphy writes that the CIA toolbox only has one tool in it, where Nosenko is concerned:
“…Our great need now is for hard, incontrovertible facts with which we can confront Nosenko, to prove to him that our conviction about his guilt is based on something more than analysis…For this, our only immediate asset is Golitsyn, who looms so importantly as a factor in this operation. We therefore hope, despite Golitsyn’s relative lack of contribution thus far, to exhaust all possibilities and get from him every possible detail…”
It’s worth noting that this eight-page memo from the summer of 1964 does not mention either #LeeHarveyOswald or the #JFKassassination, or Nosenko’s knowledge of either. What Murphy focuses on here is the knot of contradictions contained in Nosenko’s own biography, his assignments, his timeline— basics that did not add up, even before Golitsyn added his views. This is probably one of the cleanest (least overtly political) documents in the early Nosenko file.
![timfattig's tweet photo. August 1964: the #CIA’s top Soviet analyst, #DavidMurphy, writes a long memo to the CI chief, #JamesAngleton, to explain the importance of #AnatoliyGolitsyn, a #KGB defector, in taking apart claims made by a more recent defector named #YuriNosenko.
Even at this comparatively early date, Murphy was convinced that Nosenko’s defection was a misdirect on the part of the Soviets and that Golitsyn would be the instrument for uncovering that. “…[A]lthough his current comments do not provide much that is new,” Murphy wrote, “Golitsyn himself has always been a key to our understanding of the Nosenko case.”
Later in the same report Murphy writes that the CIA toolbox only has one tool in it, where Nosenko is concerned:
“…Our great need now is for hard, incontrovertible facts with which we can confront Nosenko, to prove to him that our conviction about his guilt is based on something more than analysis…For this, our only immediate asset is Golitsyn, who looms so importantly as a factor in this operation. We therefore hope, despite Golitsyn’s relative lack of contribution thus far, to exhaust all possibilities and get from him every possible detail…”
It’s worth noting that this eight-page memo from the summer of 1964 does not mention either #LeeHarveyOswald or the #JFKassassination, or Nosenko’s knowledge of either. What Murphy focuses on here is the knot of contradictions contained in Nosenko’s own biography, his assignments, his timeline— basics that did not add up, even before Golitsyn added his views. This is probably one of the cleanest (least overtly political) documents in the early Nosenko file.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMblZAra8AArJTG.jpg)
May 1986: days after attending a dark-star-studded #OSS and #CIA veteran gala in D.C., attended by former Agency directors #RichardHelms, #JamesSchlesinger, #WilliamColby, and #GeorgeBush, and former CI Chief and occasional Agency consultant #JamesAngleton, current CIA director #WilliamCasey threatened Leonard Downie of the #WashingtonPost over that newspaper’s recent publication of stories about “U.S. interceptions of other nations' secret messages.”
Downie said that Casey “had sald that he was not threatening the Post or any other news outlet, but that he personally was satisfied that a 1950 law against revealing such interceptions had been violated.”
(Baltimore Sun, 5/8/1986.)

Journalist #EdwardJayEpstein takes on yet another enemy of the dismissed #CIA counterintelligence chief #JamesAngleton, former DCI Admiral #StansfieldTurner. The problem, as Epstein saw it, turned on two things: how the CIA treated the controversial #KGB defector #YuriNosenko, and how Angleton treated DCI #RichardHelms.
(Commentary, October 1985.)

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.2M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
119.3M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
108.9M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
97.3M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.1M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
90.6M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
86.8M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
80.6M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
72.2M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.6M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
68.6M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
63.4M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.9M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
61.1M followers

X 
@x
60.9M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
59.9M followers











![timfattig's tweet photo. Former #CIA counterintelligence chief #JamesAngleton died on this date in 1987. He was 69 years old. He left no memoir of his career but his views on U.S.-Soviet relations influenced many authors critical of the Cold War “thaw” in the ‘70s and ‘80s.
Angleton is seen here about a year before his death, at an #OSS veterans reception in Washington, D.C., talking with then-current DCI #WilliamCasey.
(Allentown [Pa.] Morning Call, 5/12/1987.)](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GNT_9PDa8AArJA4.jpg)





![timfattig's tweet photo. August 1964: the #CIA’s top Soviet analyst, #DavidMurphy, writes a long memo to the CI chief, #JamesAngleton, to explain the importance of #AnatoliyGolitsyn, a #KGB defector, in taking apart claims made by a more recent defector named #YuriNosenko.
Even at this comparatively early date, Murphy was convinced that Nosenko’s defection was a misdirect on the part of the Soviets and that Golitsyn would be the instrument for uncovering that. “…[A]lthough his current comments do not provide much that is new,” Murphy wrote, “Golitsyn himself has always been a key to our understanding of the Nosenko case.”
Later in the same report Murphy writes that the CIA toolbox only has one tool in it, where Nosenko is concerned:
“…Our great need now is for hard, incontrovertible facts with which we can confront Nosenko, to prove to him that our conviction about his guilt is based on something more than analysis…For this, our only immediate asset is Golitsyn, who looms so importantly as a factor in this operation. We therefore hope, despite Golitsyn’s relative lack of contribution thus far, to exhaust all possibilities and get from him every possible detail…”
It’s worth noting that this eight-page memo from the summer of 1964 does not mention either #LeeHarveyOswald or the #JFKassassination, or Nosenko’s knowledge of either. What Murphy focuses on here is the knot of contradictions contained in Nosenko’s own biography, his assignments, his timeline— basics that did not add up, even before Golitsyn added his views. This is probably one of the cleanest (least overtly political) documents in the early Nosenko file.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMblZAnboAAo5pO.jpg)
![timfattig's tweet photo. August 1964: the #CIA’s top Soviet analyst, #DavidMurphy, writes a long memo to the CI chief, #JamesAngleton, to explain the importance of #AnatoliyGolitsyn, a #KGB defector, in taking apart claims made by a more recent defector named #YuriNosenko.
Even at this comparatively early date, Murphy was convinced that Nosenko’s defection was a misdirect on the part of the Soviets and that Golitsyn would be the instrument for uncovering that. “…[A]lthough his current comments do not provide much that is new,” Murphy wrote, “Golitsyn himself has always been a key to our understanding of the Nosenko case.”
Later in the same report Murphy writes that the CIA toolbox only has one tool in it, where Nosenko is concerned:
“…Our great need now is for hard, incontrovertible facts with which we can confront Nosenko, to prove to him that our conviction about his guilt is based on something more than analysis…For this, our only immediate asset is Golitsyn, who looms so importantly as a factor in this operation. We therefore hope, despite Golitsyn’s relative lack of contribution thus far, to exhaust all possibilities and get from him every possible detail…”
It’s worth noting that this eight-page memo from the summer of 1964 does not mention either #LeeHarveyOswald or the #JFKassassination, or Nosenko’s knowledge of either. What Murphy focuses on here is the knot of contradictions contained in Nosenko’s own biography, his assignments, his timeline— basics that did not add up, even before Golitsyn added his views. This is probably one of the cleanest (least overtly political) documents in the early Nosenko file.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMblZAmbUAAWmoZ.jpg)
![timfattig's tweet photo. August 1964: the #CIA’s top Soviet analyst, #DavidMurphy, writes a long memo to the CI chief, #JamesAngleton, to explain the importance of #AnatoliyGolitsyn, a #KGB defector, in taking apart claims made by a more recent defector named #YuriNosenko.
Even at this comparatively early date, Murphy was convinced that Nosenko’s defection was a misdirect on the part of the Soviets and that Golitsyn would be the instrument for uncovering that. “…[A]lthough his current comments do not provide much that is new,” Murphy wrote, “Golitsyn himself has always been a key to our understanding of the Nosenko case.”
Later in the same report Murphy writes that the CIA toolbox only has one tool in it, where Nosenko is concerned:
“…Our great need now is for hard, incontrovertible facts with which we can confront Nosenko, to prove to him that our conviction about his guilt is based on something more than analysis…For this, our only immediate asset is Golitsyn, who looms so importantly as a factor in this operation. We therefore hope, despite Golitsyn’s relative lack of contribution thus far, to exhaust all possibilities and get from him every possible detail…”
It’s worth noting that this eight-page memo from the summer of 1964 does not mention either #LeeHarveyOswald or the #JFKassassination, or Nosenko’s knowledge of either. What Murphy focuses on here is the knot of contradictions contained in Nosenko’s own biography, his assignments, his timeline— basics that did not add up, even before Golitsyn added his views. This is probably one of the cleanest (least overtly political) documents in the early Nosenko file.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMblZAkbAAA_19f.jpg)



