Top Tweets for #KIMSEUI

"I Can't Even Buy Water, My Survival Is at Risk"... Kim Se-ui Appeals from Detention After Commissary Funds Seized Kim Se-ui, the head of the YouTube channel Garosero Research Institute (Garo Sero Institute, Gaseyeon), who has been indicted and detained on charges including defaming actor Kim Soo-hyun, has claimed that the seizure of his detention commissary funds has left his survival at risk. On July 8, Gaseyeon released a letter that Kim wrote from the detention center via its YouTube channel. In the letter, Kim wrote: "Today, a correctional officer handed me documents stating that Eun Hyun-jang (the YouTuber known as Jangsa-ui Sin or God of Business) deposited 20 million won with the court and obtained a provisional seizure order against 100 million won worth of my commissary account funds." He continued: "There was about 300,000 won in my commissary account, but because of the seizure, I can no longer buy bottled water, toilet paper, toothpaste, toothbrushes, or even medicine. My survival is now under threat." Kim also described his deteriorating health: "For the past several days, I've been suffering from the flu and stomach problems, vomiting every morning and evening. I can't even buy cold medicine or stomach medicine. I only have four postage stamps left, and just two rolls of toilet paper. I don't know how much longer I'll be able to endure." He added that he plans to petition the court to exempt a minimum amount necessary for basic living expenses from the scope of the asset seizure. https://t.co/Bs7Ji0zp5d

✨💯🔥"Today, it wasn't just a number that changed. The direction of the ENTIRE case changed" Many headlines are highlighting that Eider reduced its lawsuit from KRW 2.5 billion to KRW 400 million. But from a legal standpoint, that is not the most important development. WHAT TRULY MATTERS IS WHAT THE COURT SAID. The judge indicated that Eider likely amended its lawsuit because its original claim for damages would have been difficult to support legally. The court went even further, questioning whether the revised claim also has sufficient legal grounds to succeed. But there was one statement that could mark a turning point: THE COURT CONSIDERED THAT BOTH EIDER AND KIM SOO HYUN WERE VICTIMS OF THE ALLEGATIONS MADE BY KIM SE-UI. ✅That statement COMPLETELY CHANGES the perspective of the case. The court no longer appears to view Kim Soo Hyun as the cause of the reputational damage, but rather as someone who also suffered the consequences of the allegations that triggered this entire controversy. ✅For that reason, the judge recommended that the parties end the litigation, keep the endorsement contract in force, and have each side bear its own legal costs. What could happen next? ✅ Eider accepts the court's recommendation and withdraws the lawsuit. The case would end without Kim Soo Hyun having to pay any compensation. (Most likely) ✅ If the litigation continues, the court could also dismiss the revised KRW 400 million claim for lack of legal merit. ✅ If the endorsement contract contains a specific applicable clause, the court could order the return of a limited portion of the endorsement fee, but not recognize the reputational damages Eider originally claimed. (Less likely) 🚨 This case has changed dramatically since Kim Se-ui's detention. Initially, several brands argued that Kim Soo Hyun had caused reputational harm. Now, it's the court itself indicating that the real source of the problem was Kim Se-ui's allegations, and that both the brand and the actor became victims of those allegations. ✅IF THIS LINE OF REASONING CONTINUES IN THE UPCOMING HEARINGS, IT WOULD NOT BE SURPRISING TO SEE OTHER COMPANIES RECONSIDER THEIR LAWSUITS OR EVEN SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THEIR CLAIMS. After months of watching narratives take precedence over evidence, it's meaningful to see the court bringing the focus back to the law and the facts. Overall, this hearing represents one of the MOST FAVORABLE DEVELOPMENTS for Kim Soo Hyun across all the civil litigation related to this case. It doesn't mean everything is over, but for the first time in a long while, the direction of these proceedings seems to be changing. And as someone who has followed this case from the very beginning, understanding the legal significance of today's hearing and seeing the facts begin to outweigh the narratives genuinely makes me very happy!!! 🙏🏻✨ #westandwithkimsoohyun

남의 눈에 눈물 나게 하면 제 눈에는 피눈물이 나는 법입니다. 검찰은 과학수사기법을 통한 감정을 활용해 경찰 수사로 드러난 녹음파일 조작 의심 정황을 재확인하고, 범죄수익을 완전히 박탈하기 위한 보완수사도 진행 중입니다. 최근 이른바 '사이버 렉카'들이 조회수와 후원금을 노리고 검증되지 않은 의혹과 조작된 가짜뉴스를 무분별하게 유포하며 개인의 삶을 파괴하고 사회적 갈등을 부추기고 있습니다. 국민 한 사람 한 사람이 존엄한 인격체인 민주주의 사회에서 타인의 사생활과 고통이 돈벌이의 수단이 되어서는 안됩니다. 허위 가짜뉴스에 대한 엄정한 처벌과, 단 한 푼도 남기지 않는 철저한 범죄수익 환수로 남의 인격을 짓밟고 그 아픔을 수익으로 삼는 '사이버렉카' 범죄를 차단하도록 하겠습니다. https://t.co/hpFvNPtWCj

🚨Kim Se-ui no asiste a su juicio por acoso a Tzuyang y el tribunal advierte medidas para asegurar su comparecencia El director del canal de YouTube Garo Sero Research Institute, Kim Se-ui, no asistió a la primera audiencia de su juicio en el Tribunal del Distrito Central de Seúl, donde está acusado de difamación, acoso y amenazas contra la youtuber Tzuyang. El tribunal señaló que, debido a su ausencia, no fue posible continuar con la sesión y advirtió que podría emitir una orden de arresto en la próxima audiencia si vuelve a no presentarse. La defensa había solicitado que el juicio se realizara a puerta cerrada, pero el tribunal rechazó la petición al considerar que el caso no lo justifica. También negó limitar la presencia de espectadores por falta de fundamentos claros. Kim ya se encuentra bajo custodia por otros cargos relacionados con la difusión de información falsa sobre el actor Kim Soo-hyun. Además, está acusado de publicar y difundir repetidamente contenido que invade la privacidad de figuras públicas y que, según la fiscalía, buscaba generar beneficios económicos a través de YouTube. El tribunal programará una nueva fecha para la próxima audiencia. https://t.co/yTbYpMZDlt #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #justiceforkimsoohyun #kimsoohyun #KimSooHyunIsInnocent