Top Tweets for #LABOURMPS
Calls for a General Election, I see.
Look, the Starmer Project failed because of an apathy that will be the end of Westminster government. The Burnham project will fail too.
All the boomer-idiot Reform voters in the world won't save it.
#Makerfield #LABOURMPS #Labour
Does anyone what @AndyBurnhamGM policies on defence,health,foreign, education sound like ? How do labour pick a unknown? #no2laboratorycandidate. Country need competitive selection.
#bbc
#ukpolitics
#brexit
#starmer
#LABOURMPS
#
Should there be a Labour Party Leadership Contest? #Labourmps
@ianrich15813274 The daft thing is so many of us #labourmembers don’t want him to go & feel this has been a stitch up, partly by the media and partly by a group of #labourmps
What’s wrong with Kier Starmer why do the labour lot want to replace him with Andy Burnham ?
Confused 😵💫 #politics #LABOURMPS #labourparty
Hate to say it, but Reform doesn’t even have to try to get into Number 10—Labour is fast-tracking them there. Ousting Keir Starmer just to fight a Reform party that was already on a collision course is an absolutely ridiculous self-own.🤦🏾♂️ #LABOURMPS #Starmer #Burnham #UkPolitics
Ancoats To New Islington in Burnham's Manchester
This is a place in the east end of the city,
Where a mass of wealth grew from enslaved cotton.
First ever industrial suburb spread with no pity,
Ana Cots’ turned into a sprawling rotten slum.
#LABOURMPS
https://t.co/JMcoVSiF5Q
Can you please speak up Prime Minister Sir Keir?
Oh, Labour, champions of the working class,
Tangled in a web of compromise, alas!
A pound shop Tory tribute act,
Selling your soul again & that’s fact 🙄
#LABOURMPS #poetry #writing
https://t.co/Mr0orxzh5e
Nobody likes a back stabber, beware for what you wish for #LABOURMPS
#LABOURMPS stop acting like the Conservatives. The country voted in a PM. The country does not need a different PM every 2/3 years.
A decade after leaving the EU, this Government is still letting Brussels tell us what to do.
They're going to ban traditional tumble dryers - not because they think that it's best for the British people, but because they're desperate to keep the EU happy.
It’s pathetic.
Would someone please tell all these fawning #LABOURMPS that Starmer got less votes in 24 than @jeremycorbyn in the previous GA. ‘Landslide’ was a gift from @reformparty_uk a gift that @Keir_Starmer has wantonly squandered #BBCLauraK
Just to remind these same folk:
You’ve not lifted 1/2m kids out of poverty. You’ve just moved them over a bureaucratic line on a Whitehall spreadsheet.
Your ‘workers rights’ are destroying entry-level jobs, hitting young people disproportionately, where unemployment is now over 16%.
You have not transformed the NHS. It’s still the same old wheezing leviathan, just with a lot more dosh and still dismal productivity.
And you’ve nationalised steel and rail before. It was not the prelude to an economic or industrial miracle. Plus you will now have to include their demands for capital/subsidies among all the other priorities already crowding in on the public purse.
Other than that your reminder was useful. Thank you.
The BBC Fabricated Trump's Words. Starmer Wants It Boosted For Fighting Disinformation.
This week, the same government that announced it would ban under-16s from most social media platforms confirmed a second policy. Force Facebook, YouTube and every major platform to algorithmically boost content from the BBC, ITV and Channel 4. The stated reason is fighting disinformation. The timing makes that justification impossible to take at face value.
The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight, while cutting the part where he told them to protest peacefully. This was not sloppy editing. It was a constructed sequence designed to produce a false impression of what was said. Trump is now suing the BBC for ten billion dollars. The corporation's own internal memo, leaked to the Telegraph last autumn, documented the edit alongside a pattern of other failures. Extensive uncritical airtime given to Hamas on BBC Arabic. A rogue unit of activist reporters censoring coverage of the trans debate to fit a predetermined narrative. A report calling car insurers racist that was found to be, in the BBC's own words, thoroughly wrong. This week it emerged the corporation sacked a presenter for criticising its Gaza coverage while taking no action against reporters who appeared to celebrate the October 7th attacks.
This is the organisation that Starmer wants boosted in the name of trusted information. Not a minor broadcaster with an isolated error. An institution funded by £3.7 billion a year in compulsory licence fees, facing a billion dollar lawsuit for fabricating a world leader's words, accused of one sided reporting on the most contested conflicts of our time, and now positioned by law to be placed ahead of every independent voice on every major platform in the country.
Put this alongside the under-16s ban and the pattern stops looking like coincidence. One policy restricts what young people can access. The other restructures what everyone sees first, adults included, engineering visibility in favour of the state broadcaster and against the independent platforms where this government's record, on Belfast, on Makerfield, on the asylum backlog and on every other documented failure, gets challenged daily by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky escaped the social media ban despite its own documented child safety failures. The BBC gets promoted despite a documented record of fabrication. Both decisions share the same logic. Visibility for institutions the government finds comfortable. Restriction for the platforms where it does not.
Lord Young of Acton, the human rights lawyer who founded the Free Speech Union, put it with the right amount of contempt. The Prime Minister has apparently decided that censoring social media should be his legacy, which is strange territory for a former human rights lawyer to choose. It is strange only if you assume the goal was ever free expression rather than managed expression. Nothing in this government's conduct this month supports that assumption.
A government that needs to legislate prominence for its preferred broadcaster is not protecting the public from disinformation. It is admitting that its preferred broadcaster cannot earn that prominence on the evidence of its own reporting, and has decided to mandate by law what trust no longer provides voluntarily. That is not journalism policy. It is state media privilege written into platform regulation, arriving in the same fortnight as a ban on what sixteen year olds may read, from a government that is rapidly running out of ways to disguise what it is actually doing.
"The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight"

🚨 I do not make historical comparisons lightly.
Your government, in line with UN priorities. is moving to crush all information not sanctioned by them.
In 1933, Goebbels argued that Germans needed protection from false information and dangerous ideas.
In 2026, Starmer says that British people need protection from “disinformation” and that social media platforms should prioritise BBC and state approved broadcaster content.
The comparison is NOT that Britain is Nazi Germany. That is a lazy argument.
The comparison is that Starmer’s government is pushing for more control over what citizens read, watch and think and that they claim it’s for our own good.
You are not free if the State decided what news you are allowed to view.
This is not the work of a government supporting democracy but one that
Doesn’t trust its citizens to keep them in power.

I am glad to hear Keir Starmer has your full support, but am a little disturbed to hear you aren’t pushing other #labourmps to support him. I hope you still are. We need him to stay.
The Prime Minister has my full support and is delivering the change the country voted for.
He won a mandate to serve working people and the country and we must continue to deliver on the progress we’ve already made.
Resorting to infighting now does not serve the country.
#LABOURMPS - YOU ARE NOT LISTENING TO THE PUBLIC OR PARTY MEMBERS. If you want to hear what the public think listen to #bbcaq any answers where the majority felt Keir should have his 5 years, & it is clear the party membership majority support #KeirStarmer ((just ask us)
So disappointed in Heidi Alexander. I thought she would be loyal. He brought her in from relative obscurity too. You just can’t trust politicians, especially #labourmps.That’s why I will leave the Labour Party if Keir goes. Shocked to hear Polly Toynbee saying he should go today.
@DENISEONEILL6 This #LabourMPs coup didn't think far ahead enough any consequences aftermath by causing 'Chaos' destabilising own elected🌹PM/Govt = like poking the bee🐝hives searching for🍯w/bare hands #PoliticsLive #Makerfield @10DowningStreet @LondonLabour
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.4M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
119.3M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
110M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
97.5M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.1M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
90.8M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
87.3M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
81.2M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
72.7M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
69.6M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
69.4M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.6M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
63.7M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
62.1M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.9M followers

X 
@x
60.9M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
60.4M followers

















