Top Tweets for #LASTPOINT
Quien encuentre el país que falta de los que no están marcados será el invitado 11 de #LastPoint
Vuestro piloto favorito ganará la siguiente carrera, pero tendréis que responder correctamente a una simple pregunta...
¿Cuál es el proyecto #LastPoint exactamente? ¿De qué va?
(Si ya lo sabéis, no respondáis a esto 😇🤙)
Acabo de notar todos los que han sido invitados a #LastPoint de momento han tenido un bug en una de las cartas, la clasificación se arreglará tan pronto como pueda
Enhorabuena por llegar a los 20 likes, aquí tenéis otro spoiler de #LastPoint
Tengo que decir que, si se llegase a la siguiente cifra, el spoiler será mucho mas loco
TEASER DE LASTPOINT
El nombre oficial del proyecto no saldrá hasta que anuncie el proyecto entero. Cada 20 likes en este post habrá un nuevo teaser que puede incluir desde fotos random hasta el logo, fecha, nombre o la salida de este
🩵&🔁
Drone view of last point of India at Dhanushkodi in Rameshwaram, India...
#Kerala #beach #lastpoint #rameshwaran #india #tour #toursim
@law93king Nyuma Ya hili Swala Kuna Mchoro Mkubwa Sn Ulishatengenezwa Mpaka Mwamba Kufikia Hapo Kwenye #Lastpoint..Siasa Ni Mchezo Mgumu Mno Na Haswa Ukiwa Na Kichwa Cha Panzi,Ngoja Waje Na Zile 4Rs Zao Sasa
Guess this palace
#lastpoint
Italy is in Davis cup final !!! #DavisCup #DavisCupFinals #lastpoint #SinnerDjokovic @janniksin @lorenzo_sonego
Big deal! This happened everyday a Pine Ridge MS did it not @Big_Ruck15 #LastPoint
Russian basketball is exactly how you’d thought it be played.
#LastPoint
#CCC'S CREDENTIALS AND TRACK RECORD FORM CS100D
There is no rhyme or reason for using a poorly designed ‘Form” – purported to be a “meritocratic yardstick” or a technical method for scouting “qualified political leaders” – which is littered with misspellings of common words, like ‘nomination’ misspelt as ‘normination’; coupled with terribly constructed questions that are replete with sophomoric errors of commission and omission, whose highlight is an embarrassing question asking the party's prospective nominees for general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator”.
Nothing beats a Curriculum Vitae (CV) whether for the purpose of security vetting; or the purpose of providing one’s personal history or record; or the purpose of detailing one’s professional qualifications, skills and competencies; or the purpose of sharing one's values, faith, family or hobbies; or the purpose of including any relevant information as may be required by the user of the CV.
The CV was invented precisely for the purpose, hence everyone around the world uses it accordingly.
No need to reinvent the wheel.
Should a questionnaire be necessary, to get particular information not easily or reasonably providable in a CV, then that questionnaire should be professionally designed not just as a form, but as a data tool whose input is amenable to scientific analysis, removed from self-serving mumbo jumbo interpretations.
Lastly, while it is a given and is therefore perfectly understandable that political parties are free to do what they think is best for them and their interests; it must also be understood that when political parties put any information out there in the public domain, then members of the public are fully entitled to scrutinise or to critique that information with no holds barred.
#CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ – which asks the party’s prospective nominees for the 2023 general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator” - was shared in these streets yesterday by @nelsonchamisa, the party’s leader.
Accordingly, the chips should lie where they fall as far as public scrutiny of the document is concerned.
As a document, #CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ personifies mediocrity and as such, leaves a lot to be desired, coming as it does from a political formation that claims to be the “main opposition” party and “[the] government in waiting".
It would be irrational and a public disservice not to review or critique the document, when it has been put in the public domain by none other than Nelson Chamisa himself. Leaving it alone with its errors of commission and omission would risk normalising mediocrity purely on political grounds!
![ProfJNMoyo's tweet photo. #LastPoint
#CCC'S CREDENTIALS AND TRACK RECORD FORM CS100D
There is no rhyme or reason for using a poorly designed ‘Form” – purported to be a “meritocratic yardstick” or a technical method for scouting “qualified political leaders” – which is littered with misspellings of common words, like ‘nomination’ misspelt as ‘normination’; coupled with terribly constructed questions that are replete with sophomoric errors of commission and omission, whose highlight is an embarrassing question asking the party's prospective nominees for general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator”.
Nothing beats a Curriculum Vitae (CV) whether for the purpose of security vetting; or the purpose of providing one’s personal history or record; or the purpose of detailing one’s professional qualifications, skills and competencies; or the purpose of sharing one's values, faith, family or hobbies; or the purpose of including any relevant information as may be required by the user of the CV.
The CV was invented precisely for the purpose, hence everyone around the world uses it accordingly.
No need to reinvent the wheel.
Should a questionnaire be necessary, to get particular information not easily or reasonably providable in a CV, then that questionnaire should be professionally designed not just as a form, but as a data tool whose input is amenable to scientific analysis, removed from self-serving mumbo jumbo interpretations.
Lastly, while it is a given and is therefore perfectly understandable that political parties are free to do what they think is best for them and their interests; it must also be understood that when political parties put any information out there in the public domain, then members of the public are fully entitled to scrutinise or to critique that information with no holds barred.
#CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ – which asks the party’s prospective nominees for the 2023 general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator” - was shared in these streets yesterday by @nelsonchamisa, the party’s leader.
Accordingly, the chips should lie where they fall as far as public scrutiny of the document is concerned.
As a document, #CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ personifies mediocrity and as such, leaves a lot to be desired, coming as it does from a political formation that claims to be the “main opposition” party and “[the] government in waiting".
It would be irrational and a public disservice not to review or critique the document, when it has been put in the public domain by none other than Nelson Chamisa himself. Leaving it alone with its errors of commission and omission would risk normalising mediocrity purely on political grounds!](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuPbif0XwAQgWNA.jpg)
![ProfJNMoyo's tweet photo. #LastPoint
#CCC'S CREDENTIALS AND TRACK RECORD FORM CS100D
There is no rhyme or reason for using a poorly designed ‘Form” – purported to be a “meritocratic yardstick” or a technical method for scouting “qualified political leaders” – which is littered with misspellings of common words, like ‘nomination’ misspelt as ‘normination’; coupled with terribly constructed questions that are replete with sophomoric errors of commission and omission, whose highlight is an embarrassing question asking the party's prospective nominees for general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator”.
Nothing beats a Curriculum Vitae (CV) whether for the purpose of security vetting; or the purpose of providing one’s personal history or record; or the purpose of detailing one’s professional qualifications, skills and competencies; or the purpose of sharing one's values, faith, family or hobbies; or the purpose of including any relevant information as may be required by the user of the CV.
The CV was invented precisely for the purpose, hence everyone around the world uses it accordingly.
No need to reinvent the wheel.
Should a questionnaire be necessary, to get particular information not easily or reasonably providable in a CV, then that questionnaire should be professionally designed not just as a form, but as a data tool whose input is amenable to scientific analysis, removed from self-serving mumbo jumbo interpretations.
Lastly, while it is a given and is therefore perfectly understandable that political parties are free to do what they think is best for them and their interests; it must also be understood that when political parties put any information out there in the public domain, then members of the public are fully entitled to scrutinise or to critique that information with no holds barred.
#CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ – which asks the party’s prospective nominees for the 2023 general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator” - was shared in these streets yesterday by @nelsonchamisa, the party’s leader.
Accordingly, the chips should lie where they fall as far as public scrutiny of the document is concerned.
As a document, #CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ personifies mediocrity and as such, leaves a lot to be desired, coming as it does from a political formation that claims to be the “main opposition” party and “[the] government in waiting".
It would be irrational and a public disservice not to review or critique the document, when it has been put in the public domain by none other than Nelson Chamisa himself. Leaving it alone with its errors of commission and omission would risk normalising mediocrity purely on political grounds!](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuPbiIBXgAIoNyw.jpg)
![ProfJNMoyo's tweet photo. #LastPoint
#CCC'S CREDENTIALS AND TRACK RECORD FORM CS100D
There is no rhyme or reason for using a poorly designed ‘Form” – purported to be a “meritocratic yardstick” or a technical method for scouting “qualified political leaders” – which is littered with misspellings of common words, like ‘nomination’ misspelt as ‘normination’; coupled with terribly constructed questions that are replete with sophomoric errors of commission and omission, whose highlight is an embarrassing question asking the party's prospective nominees for general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator”.
Nothing beats a Curriculum Vitae (CV) whether for the purpose of security vetting; or the purpose of providing one’s personal history or record; or the purpose of detailing one’s professional qualifications, skills and competencies; or the purpose of sharing one's values, faith, family or hobbies; or the purpose of including any relevant information as may be required by the user of the CV.
The CV was invented precisely for the purpose, hence everyone around the world uses it accordingly.
No need to reinvent the wheel.
Should a questionnaire be necessary, to get particular information not easily or reasonably providable in a CV, then that questionnaire should be professionally designed not just as a form, but as a data tool whose input is amenable to scientific analysis, removed from self-serving mumbo jumbo interpretations.
Lastly, while it is a given and is therefore perfectly understandable that political parties are free to do what they think is best for them and their interests; it must also be understood that when political parties put any information out there in the public domain, then members of the public are fully entitled to scrutinise or to critique that information with no holds barred.
#CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ – which asks the party’s prospective nominees for the 2023 general election candidates to “provide details of your proven loyalty to The Creator” - was shared in these streets yesterday by @nelsonchamisa, the party’s leader.
Accordingly, the chips should lie where they fall as far as public scrutiny of the document is concerned.
As a document, #CCC’s ‘Credentials and Track Record Form CS100D’ personifies mediocrity and as such, leaves a lot to be desired, coming as it does from a political formation that claims to be the “main opposition” party and “[the] government in waiting".
It would be irrational and a public disservice not to review or critique the document, when it has been put in the public domain by none other than Nelson Chamisa himself. Leaving it alone with its errors of commission and omission would risk normalising mediocrity purely on political grounds!](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuPbh4HWIAE_Q16.jpg)
THAT'S THE MATCH
Ayumi Miyamoto bests Yu-Chin Tsai, 6-4, 6-2, to secure match point 👏
🤠 4
🐸 1
#GoPokes | #AdvantageOSU
So apparently Playstation doesn't like to sell to Africa..
How would you feel if you couldn't buy a game because the platform YOU BOUGHT doesn't support the card information in your region.
Not even available places to comfortably buy even PS vouchers.
This needs to be heard!
EPISODE #90!
We are joined by Adam of @certainpovpod to talk #Kenobi, cargo kilts, #ScarifCon, and play tunes from #LastPoint and @snowcoats!
YouTube: https://t.co/P3bvVEdp7a
Apple: https://t.co/D1Jrr3UtC6
Spotify: https://t.co/SyCJyce972
#WeAreRed5 #Red5Network
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
bocil()
Seen from Malaysia
sex
Seen from Netherlands
minichat
Seen from United States
minichat(*(((****************(((****)))********(((*****)))***************)))***)filter:native_video
Seen from Turkey
arab #bnwo
Seen from United States
minichat()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()********************* filter:videos
Seen from Germany
omegle() filter:videos
Seen from Turkey
trans outside
Seen from India
anxiouspanda() ** () filter:videos
Seen from Argentina
lecturacomprensiva
Seen from United States
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.9M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers