Top Tweets for #LEMONPOUNDCAKE
not that hard #LEMONPOUNDCAKE telling someone you are sending help, that never comes....interesting move
They have to treat disabled people equally and give them access to the same police services everyone else gets. They do not have to take every complaint and turn it into a criminal case. What that means in practice: - Police cannot refuse to take a report, hang up, or close a call solely because the caller is disabled. - They must provide reasonable accommodations needed to use the service (for example, extra time, an interpreter, or a different way to give a statement). - If an officer has contact and reasonable cause to believe an adult with a qualifying disability has been abused—including financial exploitation—Oregon law requires a report to APS or law enforcement. - The ADA does not require officers to investigate something that is not a crime, arrest someone without probable cause, or act as a collection agency for a money dispute. So: they have to receive the person, take the information, and follow reporting rules. They do not have to “help” in the sense of guaranteeing an investigation, charges, or recovery of money if the facts look civil rather than criminal.
WHAT A FUCKING SHOCK YOUR ABELISM PRICKS @PoliceEugene who want to be famous as a failure
#LEMONPOUNDCAKE you just gotta shove your pregnant man ego to the side
In Oregon, financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability is defined both as a form of “abuse” that Adult Protective Services can investigate and as conduct that can support a civil lawsuit. Under ORS 124.005, abuse includes wrongfully taking or appropriating money or property of an elderly person or a person with a disability. It also includes knowingly alarming that person by threatening to take the money or property, if a reasonable person in that situation would believe the threat would be carried out. ORS 124.110 sets out when a civil action for financial abuse may be brought. The main criteria are: - Someone wrongfully takes or appropriates money or property belonging to a vulnerable person. A fiduciary relationship is not required. Courts have said a taking is “wrongful” when it is done with an improper motive or by improper means. - Someone holds or controls money or property that belongs to the vulnerable person, or is held in trust for that person, and then refuses without good cause to return it after being asked, if that person obtained the control from the vulnerable person and acted in bad faith or should have known the money had to be returned. - Certain sweepstakes-restraining-order violations, which are a narrow additional category. A “vulnerable person” includes an elderly person (65 or older), a financially incapable person, an incapacitated person, or a person with a disability who is susceptible to force, threat, duress, coercion, persuasion, or injury because of that impairment. Transfers made to qualify someone for Medicaid or other public benefits are excluded from these financial-abuse definitions. These criteria are broader than the criminal theft statutes. APS can investigate and offer protective services based on a civil-style standard of wrongful taking. A criminal theft or theft-by-deception case still requires proof of the specific intent elements in ORS Chapter 164. An APS substantiation is not a criminal conviction, and a disputed financial relationship or claimed agreement can still prevent either agency from treating the matter as a completed crime. Their cooperation is essential.
#LEMONPOUNDCAKE the same 911 that pranked me today and never showed up?
Oregon Adult Protective Services, part of the Department of Human Services, investigates reports of abuse, including financial exploitation, of older adults and adults with disabilities. Reports can be made to the SAFEline at 855-503-SAFE. The local office first screens the report to decide whether it meets criteria for investigation and how quickly a response is required. Triage sets the speed of the first contact. Emergencies go to 911 immediately. Cases involving imminent danger are to be started the same working day. Hazardous but less urgent situations are to be started by the end of the next working day. Chronic or lower-risk situations may be started within five working days. Once an investigation is opened, the statute requires it to begin promptly. The investigator is supposed to visit the alleged victim, interview people who may have relevant information, and gather available evidence. Interviews with the alleged victim and alleged perpetrator are generally unannounced and in person unless safety, inability to obtain an in-person interview, or a law-enforcement request requires a different approach. Interviews are private unless the person being interviewed asks someone else to be present. Financial records are not automatically available. APS may obtain them if the account holder authorizes disclosure, if a bank initiates contact because of suspected exploitation, or, when the alleged victim cannot consent and a suspected perpetrator controls access, by working with law enforcement to obtain a subpoena. If APS finds reasonable cause that a crime occurred, it must notify the appropriate law enforcement agency in writing. Police must then tell APS whether they will investigate, refer the matter to the district attorney, or decline a criminal investigation and explain why. APS and police are expected to work in parallel without increasing risk to the alleged victim. Community investigations are to be completed within 120 days of the screening decision unless a concurrent criminal case delays them. The file is closed in the state’s Centralized Abuse Management system with written findings, a conclusion, and a note of any protective services offered. Reports and investigations are confidential. After the case is finished, the reporter, alleged victim, and alleged perpetrator may be told that an allegation was investigated and what type of abuse was alleged; they do not automatically receive the full investigative file. A substantiated finding against an alleged perpetrator is reviewed centrally and can trigger a formal notice and a limited right to request administrative review. APS can offer protective services, but those services are voluntary unless a court later grants a protective order. An APS finding that abuse occurred is not itself a criminal conviction.
#LEMONPOUNDCAKE Sara K. Adams, posting as @PsyCyber1399, has publicly accused Jaime Vona of taking $2,340 through card charges she says she matched to nine receipts across three trips, including two $412 charges at a harbor hotel. Adams, who describes herself as disabled and living on fixed income, states that the money was used for vacations and that she has been unable to get Eugene Police to treat the matter as a crime. Those assertions appear only in her own posts; no news articles or official Eugene Police statements name either person in connection with an investigation. Oregon law treats a report as criminal only when the facts appear to meet the elements of a defined offense and there is probable cause. Financial disagreements that involve a prior relationship, shared access, or a claimed agreement are frequently classified as civil at intake because police authority is limited to crimes. Eugene Police routes many theft and fraud reports that are not in progress to an online system reviewed by community service officers rather than sending a sworn officer immediately. Theft in Oregon is defined in ORS 164.015 as taking, obtaining, or withholding another’s property with intent to deprive or appropriate it. Value determines the degree: less than $100 is third-degree (misdemeanor), $100 to $999 is second-degree (misdemeanor), and $1,000 or more is first-degree (Class C felony). Theft by deception under ORS 164.085 requires the additional showing that the defendant obtained the property through one of five listed deceptive acts and acted with a conscious objective to take it by deception. A later-broken promise, by itself, does not prove that intent. The statutes do not change those elements according to the wealth of either party. A separate chapter (ORS 124) creates an extra civil and investigative path when the person who lost money is a vulnerable adult, including a person with a disability; Adult Protective Services can investigate and notify police if it finds reasonable cause that a crime occurred. That framework exists to add protection for certain victims. It does not redefine theft or automatically convert a disputed financial matter into a criminal case. Prosecutors still must prove ownership, the taking or deception, and the required mental state beyond a reasonable doubt.
#LEMONPOUNDCAKE
Oregon defines theft in ORS 164.015. A person commits theft when, with intent to deprive the owner of property or to appropriate it, they take, obtain, withhold, or receive that property, or obtain it by deception or extortion. The degree of the crime depends mainly on the value of the property in a single or aggregated transaction: - Theft in the third degree (ORS 164.043): value less than $100. Class C misdemeanor. - Theft in the second degree (ORS 164.045): value $100 or more but less than $1,000. Class A misdemeanor. - Theft in the first degree (ORS 164.055): value $1,000 or more, or the property is a firearm, explosive, livestock, companion animal, or certain other specified items. Class C felony. Theft by deception (ORS 164.085) is one of the ways theft can be committed. It requires intent to defraud plus an act such as creating a false impression about value or intention, failing to correct a false impression the person previously created, or promising performance the person does not intend to carry out. A broken promise by itself is not enough to prove the required intent. Identity theft is a separate offense under ORS 165.800. It is a Class C felony and involves obtaining, possessing, transferring, or using another person’s personal identification with intent to deceive or defraud. Prosecutors must prove every element, including the specific intent to deprive or appropriate, beyond a reasonable doubt. Disputed ownership, a claimed agreement, or shared access to an account can make that intent element harder to establish at the police-report stage, which is one reason some financial complaints are initially treated as civil.
DO YOUR JOB #LEMONPOUNDCAKE @EugenePolice
- In a typical scenario a covert narcissist first mirrors a target’s professional style, language, or public persona so they appear aligned and trustworthy, then begins quietly taking credit for ideas or introductions that originated with the target. - Over time they introduce small doubts or competing narratives to others (“they’ve been a bit off lately,” “I actually helped them with that”), which blurs the target’s distinct reputation and makes the narcissist look like the more reliable or insightful party. - The extracted “profits” are the target’s opportunities, recognition, and emotional energy; the target is left questioning their own value while the covert narcissist occupies the improved position they created through the impersonation and dilution.
@EugenePolice you're on my data set now #Lemonpoundcake of hatred. I didn't know you had a profiler, and a risk assessor on staff..bc u r a basic beat cop, and u never bothered asking, just did all the assuming, including what my fear was and how you would not serve it. #liedtofaceinmyhouse
#JAIMEVONA did all this and the #EugenePolice say, we don't deal with your disabled self; you enjoy your terror if we don't have to write a half a page report. Gonna get me killed. #LEMONPOUNDCAKE
#lemonpoundcake #contactedFbiandanyandeveryagency available to someone fixed income disabled who the police know is being stalked, cyberstalker, cyberstalker by proxy, #Landhamact, #LOSSOFSAFEHARBOR, but they cannot help a disabled whistbleblower to the #BOARDOFPENNSYLVANIA< I think they would beg to fucking differ.
THEY are furious with you laziness too; it cost them their resources instead. That is called #passingoffonpassingoff #lemonpoundcake
AS I said, I will be enjoying your assets #LEMONPOUNDCAKE
- Course-of-conduct statutes such as Oregon’s stalking law and federal cyberstalking provisions allow a pattern of separate acts to be treated as one offense, yet initial dispatch and patrol screening still evaluate each call against immediate-threat or probable-cause criteria rather than assembling the full timeline on the first contact. - A “no crime” or CAD-only clearance on individual reports does not erase the earlier contacts; those CAD numbers remain available for a later written packet that maps the sequence to the statutory elements. - The decision to treat events as isolated is an investigative-screening choice, not a legal determination that the pattern does not exist; that determination, if it occurs, is made by a prosecutor or court after a case file is opened.
The Ego Takes The Stand Ep 23: 🎤 Adams County Deputies v Afroman — The “Lemon Poundcake” Lawsuit
🗓️Monday, August 3
⏰12:30pm ET
▶️ https://t.co/sxTzeP5CWi
It's another Ego episode and this time, we're looking at Afroman.
#Afroman #LemonPoundCake #AdamsCounty #TrialTVLive #OhioTrials
Afroman “Lemon Pound Cake”-Dethfender Reacts! https://t.co/EXGZMaTqKz via @YouTube
#Afroman #youtube #MusicReaction #TwitchStream #LemonPoundCake #Rap #Twitch #CourtCase #AdamsCountySheriff
@ogafroman @blknoiz06 And the reputation you just built back up will burn to ashes. Sad to see. #lemonpoundcake
@DietWaterGUY #ABC = All BS Content! BRICK BY BRICK! #ABCFakeNews Covering for #BricksAndMinifigs & Corrupt #AmericanForkPD & the #Utah Mormon Mafia who Steals From Old People w Cancer! #FreeRecklessBen @AAGDhillon #1A #LemonPoundCake @tyleraloevera @JudicialWatch @mrddmia @Article3Project
Is the lemon hittin? 🍋 Or are these pound cakes getting passed on to father's day 😂 Full video out now, link in bio! #mothersday #poundcake #lemonpoundcake #alldefcomedy
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.2M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.2M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.2M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers