Top Tweets for #MILORDS

In the Madhya Pradesh High Court, a husband reportedly said during a maintenance case: "I am ready to go to jail. If you want to hang me, hang me to death. But I cannot pay maintenance to my wife." Before all the SIMPs, feminists, and supporters of a gynocentric society rush to blame this man, consider these: 1. She doesn't want to live with him. Case is being going on since 2015. (11+ years) 2. She dragged her husband all the way to the High Court, where legal fees alone can run into lakhs. 3. If she doesn't want to live with him, she has the option to seek a divorce, find a job, and support herself. Instead, she has chosen to beg the court for maintenance. 4. The husband is suffering here. When a marriage breaks down, couples should ideally resolve their differences outside the courtroom and opt for a mutual divorce rather than spend years fighting legal battles. 5. Alimony and maintenance have become a business opportunity for lawyers and, a weapon used by women to financially harass husbands for years. The husband may have made a bold statement, but don't try this in court. If you're employed or own movable or immovable property, you have a lot to lose. The legal and financial consequences can be serious. A marriage may end, but the legal and financial battles can continue for years. https://t.co/bwTTmJvxyx

Supreme Court hears a petitioner appearing in person: Petitioner: Humare upar sankat hai. Hum prakriti se ladh rahe hai. Hum nyaay ke liye “Satya” jhanda, sanatan dharm aur mandir pe lagaya tha. (We are facing a crisis. We are fighting against nature. We had put up the “Truth” flag at the temple for justice, [in connection with] Sanatan Dharma.) Court: Aap chahte hai ki aapne jo flag design kiya hai usko national flag bana diya jaaye? (Do you want the flag you have designed to be declared the national flag?) Petitioner: Wo satya ka jhanda hai. Prakriti ke satya ke aadhar par. Humare nyaay ke liye wo humara hatiyaar hai. (That is the flag of truth, based on the truth of nature. It is our weapon in our fight for justice.) Court: Rashtriya dhwaj already stapit hai. Uska design aap explain kar sakte hai? Saare rang ka matlab kya hai who explain kar sakte hai? Aap apne ghar pe lagaiye aapka jhanda. (The national flag has already been established. Can you explain its design? Can you explain what all its colours mean? Put your flag up at your own home.) Petitioner: Mandir pe lagaya hai. (I have put it up at the temple.) Court: Theek hai, dismissed. (Alright, dismissed.)

Software engineer Sambhav Jain. Married in 2023 and had a premature child who faced frequent illnesses, leading to heavy medical expenses that forced him into deep debt. The resulting financial strain triggered severe marital discord, culminating in a 2025 divorce with a total settlement agreement of ₹3 crore to his wife. Had already paid ₹1 crore, he was facing an immediate demand for the next ₹1 crore alongside his mounting medical debts. Overwhelmed by financial distress and mental stress, he messaged his father stating he could no longer manage the liabilities before jumping from the 42nd floor in Noida. Sad.

Election Commission has FINALLY published the list of 33 lakh voters who are being served notices under the Delhi SIR! This should have happened on 31st August itself, when the draft SIR list was released. We had been highlighting this glaring omission and had finally filed a petition to the Supreme Court. The matter was mentioned before the CJI’s bench on Thursday and the Court agreed to hear it on 22nd Sept. Check the list on the CEO Delhi website to see if a notice has been issued to you. However the fight for transparency continues - ECI has still NOT disclosed the criteria for flagging voters under the category of “logical discrepancies”. This is critical to prevent arbitrariness. Out of 1.45 crore voters in Delhi, 47 lakh were removed during the SIR enumeration phase. Of the 97 lakh who made it to the draft list, now 33 lakh people have been issued notices for being unmapped or for logical discrepancy.