Top Tweets for #MedicalComparison

about 2 years ago

"Spinal Showdown: Thoracic vs. Lumbar - What You Need to Know!" #MedicalComparison #SpineHealth #SpinalAnesthesia #NeuraxialAnesthesia #SegmentalSpinalAnesthesia #ThoracicVsLumarNeuraxials #SpinalSafety #MedTwitter My 10 Points: A. PROS AND CONS 1. Thoracic spinal anesthesia Pros: a. Indications: Suitable for thorax, breast, and upper abdomen surgeries. b. Less hypotension: Due to the higher injection level. c. Obstetric suitability: For certain obstetric procedures like cesarean sections. d. Lower volume requirement: Less required LA volume potentially reduces systemic toxicity risk. e. It can explored in deformed or post-instrumented lumbar spines, especially for below umbilicus surgeries. f. Suitable for segmental spinal anesthesia without involving lower roots. Cons: a. Limited anesthesia spread: Coverage is not as effective as lumbar spinal anesthesia. b. Limited suitability: Not suitable for some lower abdominal, pelvic or lower extremity surgeries. c. Risk of complications: Like PDPH and nerve damage, albeit rare. d. Technical challenge: Requires precise injection technique due to smaller interlaminar spaces and angulated spinous processes. e. Risk of spinal cord injury with untrained hands. 2. Lumbar spinal anesthesia: Pros: a. Indications: Surgeries below the umbilicus, including lower abdominal surgeries and lower limb procedures. b. Technically easy: Due to the larger size of the lumbar spinal canal, wider interlaminar spaces, and less angulated spinous processes. c. Offers flexibility in adjusting the level of anesthesia by selecting the appropriate lumbar interspace for injection. d. Effective for surgeries requiring prolonged anesthesia, such as major orthopedic procedures. Cons: a. Increased risk of hypotension due to a larger volume of LA required and lower injection level. b. Higher risk of complications such as PDPH and nerve damage compared to thoracic spinal anesthesia. c. Not suitable for surgeries involving the upper abdomen. d. Relatively contraindicated in deformed and post-instrumented spine. e. Not suitable for segmental spinal anesthesia. B. KNOW THE TARGET- EXITING NERVE ROOT 3. Thoracic Nerve Roots: a. The thoracic nerve roots are smaller in diameter than the lumbar because thoracic nerves primarily handle sensory functions for the trunk and abdomen, with less motor function. b. Consequently, compression or injury to these smaller thoracic nerve roots may lead to symptoms like chest or abdominal pain, numbness, or weakness, albeit potentially less severe due to their smaller size. 4. Lumbar Nerve Roots: a. The lumbar nerve roots are thicker than the thoracic because lumbar nerves serve significant sensory and motor functions, controlling movement and sensation in the lower body. b. This larger diameter can exacerbate symptoms in cases of compression or injury, potentially leading to more pronounced issues like leg pain, weakness, or numbness, commonly associated with conditions such as disc herniation or spinal stenosis. C. CSF HOMEOSTASIS 5. CSF Volumes: · The total volume in normal adults is 90-200 ml. · 20% in ventricles and 80% in subarachnoid space. · 50% Intracranial and 50% Extracranial. · Total CSF volume in Spine = 81 ± 13 mL Cervical - 19 ± 4 mL Thoracic - 38 ± 8 mL Lumbosacral - 25 ± 7 mL · Average 5 ml of CSF/vertebral level with high individual variability. 6. CSF Pressure: CSF pressure varies slightly depending on the spinal level when measured in the sitting position, with the pressure typically being lower in the lumbar region compared to the thoracic and cervical regions. · Cervical region: 8 to 20 mmHg. · Lumbar region: 6 to 15 mmHg. · Thoracic region: 7 to 18 mmHg. D. WHY IS PDPH LESS COMMON IN THORACIC SA? 7. Anatomical/physiological factors: a. Less CSF pressure fluctuation between sitting and supine positions reduces the likelihood of CSF leakage and PDPH. b. Lower CSF volume in the thoracic region minimizes the amount lost in case of dural puncture, reducing the risk of PDPH. c. Reduced mobility in the thoracic spine lowers stress on the dural puncture site, decreasing the risk of CSF leakage and PDPH. d. Thinner dura mater in the thoracic region is less prone to tearing, further reducing the risk of CSF leakage. e. The thoracic spinal canal is narrower, making accidental punctures less likely to affect the dura mater and cause cerebrospinal fluid leakage. E. WHY IS THINNER DURA LESS PRONE TO TEARING? 8. The dura mater is the tough outermost membrane covering the brain and spinal cord, and its thickness can vary depending on the region of the spine. a. Greater elasticity: Thinner dura has more elasticity, flexing and deforming under stress instead of tearing outright, which absorbs mechanical forces and lowers the risk of tearing. b. Less tissue to traverse: Thinner dura requires less force for penetration, reducing the likelihood of inadvertent tearing. c. Less resistance to needle insertion: Thinner dura offers less resistance to spinal needle insertion, reducing frictional forces and the risk of tearing. d. Lower structural stress: Thinner structures experience lower internal stresses, decreasing the risk of tears due to mechanical strain. e. Faster healing: Thinner tissues often heal faster, reducing the risk of complications such as CSF leaks. 9. Why less paresthesia during thoracic spinal anesthesia? a. Thoracic spinal nerves are thinner than those in the lumbar region, so they are less likely to be stimulated during needle insertion, reducing the likelihood of paresthesia. b. Different nerve distribution: The lumbar nerves are larger and more densely packed than the thoracic nerves, so there is a higher chance of accidentally stimulating a nerve root, leading to paresthesia. c. The thoracic spine is less mobile than the lumbar spine, making it easier to accurately insert the spinal needle without inadvertently contacting nerve roots, decreasing the likelihood of paresthesia. d. The dura mater in the thoracic region is thinner than the lumbar region, making it less likely to impinge on nerve roots during needle insertion, reducing the risk of nerve stimulation and subsequent paresthesia. e. Different Patient Positioning: During lumbar spinal anesthesia, the sitting position can place more stress on nerve roots and increase the likelihood of paresthesia. In contrast, the lateral decubitus or prone position during thoracic spinal anesthesia can provide better access to the spinal space with less nerve interference. 10. SAFETY: a. Both thoracic and lumbar spinal anesthesia can be safe and effective when performed correctly by experienced practitioners. b. However, lumbar spinal anesthesia may carry a slightly lower risk of complications due to anatomical differences. c. As with any medical procedure, careful patient selection, proper technique, and close monitoring are essential to minimize risks and ensure patient safety.

KartikBSonawane's tweet photo. "Spinal Showdown: Thoracic vs. Lumbar - What You Need to Know!"

#MedicalComparison #SpineHealth #SpinalAnesthesia #NeuraxialAnesthesia
#SegmentalSpinalAnesthesia #ThoracicVsLumarNeuraxials #SpinalSafety
#MedTwitter

My 10 Points:

A. PROS AND CONS

1. Thoracic spinal anesthesia

Pros:

a. Indications: Suitable for thorax, breast, and upper abdomen surgeries.

b. Less hypotension: Due to the higher injection level.
c. Obstetric suitability: For certain obstetric procedures like cesarean sections.

d. Lower volume requirement: Less required LA volume potentially reduces systemic toxicity risk.

e. It can explored in deformed or post-instrumented lumbar spines, especially for below umbilicus surgeries.

f. Suitable for segmental spinal anesthesia without involving lower roots.

Cons:

a. Limited anesthesia spread: Coverage is not as effective as lumbar spinal anesthesia.

b. Limited suitability: Not suitable for some lower abdominal, pelvic or lower extremity surgeries.

c. Risk of complications: Like PDPH and nerve damage, albeit rare.

d. Technical challenge: Requires precise injection technique due to smaller interlaminar spaces and angulated spinous processes.

e. Risk of spinal cord injury with untrained hands.

2. Lumbar spinal anesthesia:

Pros:

a. Indications: Surgeries below the umbilicus, including lower abdominal surgeries and lower limb procedures.

b. Technically easy: Due to the larger size of the lumbar spinal canal, wider interlaminar spaces, and less angulated spinous processes.

c. Offers flexibility in adjusting the level of anesthesia by selecting the appropriate lumbar interspace for injection.

d. Effective for surgeries requiring prolonged anesthesia, such as major orthopedic procedures.

Cons:

a. Increased risk of hypotension due to a larger volume of LA required and lower injection level.

b. Higher risk of complications such as PDPH and nerve damage compared to thoracic spinal anesthesia.

c. Not suitable for surgeries involving the upper abdomen.

d. Relatively contraindicated in deformed and post-instrumented spine.

e. Not suitable for segmental spinal anesthesia.

B. KNOW THE TARGET- EXITING NERVE ROOT

3. Thoracic Nerve Roots:

a. The thoracic nerve roots are smaller in diameter than the lumbar because thoracic nerves primarily handle sensory functions for the trunk and abdomen, with less motor function.

b. Consequently, compression or injury to these smaller thoracic nerve roots may lead to symptoms like chest or abdominal pain, numbness, or weakness, albeit potentially less severe due to their smaller size.

4. Lumbar Nerve Roots:

a. The lumbar nerve roots are thicker than the thoracic because lumbar nerves serve significant sensory and motor functions, controlling movement and sensation in the lower body.

b. This larger diameter can exacerbate symptoms in cases of compression or injury, potentially leading to more pronounced issues like leg pain, weakness, or numbness, commonly associated with conditions such as disc herniation or spinal stenosis.

C. CSF HOMEOSTASIS

5. CSF Volumes:

· The total volume in normal adults is 90-200 ml.
· 20% in ventricles and 80% in subarachnoid space.
· 50% Intracranial and 50% Extracranial.
· Total CSF volume in Spine = 81 ± 13 mL
Cervical - 19 ± 4 mL
Thoracic - 38 ± 8 mL
Lumbosacral - 25 ± 7 mL
· Average 5 ml of CSF/vertebral level with high individual variability.

6. CSF Pressure:

CSF pressure varies slightly depending on the spinal level when measured in the sitting position, with the pressure typically being lower in the lumbar region compared to the thoracic and cervical regions.
· Cervical region: 8 to 20 mmHg.
· Lumbar region: 6 to 15 mmHg.
· Thoracic region: 7 to 18 mmHg.

D. WHY IS PDPH LESS COMMON IN THORACIC SA?

7. Anatomical/physiological factors:

a. Less CSF pressure fluctuation between sitting and supine positions reduces the likelihood of CSF leakage and PDPH.

b. Lower CSF volume in the thoracic region minimizes the amount lost in case of dural puncture, reducing the risk of PDPH.

c. Reduced mobility in the thoracic spine lowers stress on the dural puncture site, decreasing the risk of CSF leakage and PDPH.

d. Thinner dura mater in the thoracic region is less prone to tearing, further reducing the risk of CSF leakage.

e. The thoracic spinal canal is narrower, making accidental punctures less likely to affect the dura mater and cause cerebrospinal fluid leakage.

E. WHY IS THINNER DURA LESS PRONE TO TEARING?

8. The dura mater is the tough outermost membrane covering the brain and spinal cord, and its thickness can vary depending on the region of the spine.

a. Greater elasticity: Thinner dura has more elasticity, flexing and deforming under stress instead of tearing outright, which absorbs mechanical forces and lowers the risk of tearing.

b. Less tissue to traverse: Thinner dura requires less force for penetration, reducing the likelihood of inadvertent tearing.

c. Less resistance to needle insertion: Thinner dura offers less resistance to spinal needle insertion, reducing frictional forces and the risk of tearing.

d. Lower structural stress: Thinner structures experience lower internal stresses, decreasing the risk of tears due to mechanical strain.

e. Faster healing: Thinner tissues often heal faster, reducing the risk of complications such as CSF leaks.

9. Why less paresthesia during thoracic spinal anesthesia?

a. Thoracic spinal nerves are thinner than those in the lumbar region, so they are less likely to be stimulated during needle insertion, reducing the likelihood of paresthesia.

b. Different nerve distribution: The lumbar nerves are larger and more densely packed than the thoracic nerves, so there is a higher chance of accidentally stimulating a nerve root, leading to paresthesia.

c. The thoracic spine is less mobile than the lumbar spine, making it easier to accurately insert the spinal needle without inadvertently contacting nerve roots, decreasing the likelihood of paresthesia.

d. The dura mater in the thoracic region is thinner than the lumbar region, making it less likely to impinge on nerve roots during needle insertion, reducing the risk of nerve stimulation and subsequent paresthesia.

e. Different Patient Positioning: During lumbar spinal anesthesia, the sitting position can place more stress on nerve roots and increase the likelihood of paresthesia. In contrast, the lateral decubitus or prone position during thoracic spinal anesthesia can provide better access to the spinal space with less nerve interference.

10. SAFETY:

a. Both thoracic and lumbar spinal anesthesia can be safe and effective when performed correctly by experienced practitioners.

b. However, lumbar spinal anesthesia may carry a slightly lower risk of complications due to anatomical differences.

c. As with any medical procedure, careful patient selection, proper technique, and close monitoring are essential to minimize risks and ensure patient safety.

126

16K

Top Tweets for #MedicalComparison

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users