Top Tweets for #Midoloss

What a good day to be alive 🫠🫠 BREAKING NEWS 📰 🚨🗞️ Kim Soo-hyun’s Agency Wins ₩500 Million Contract Deposit Return Lawsuit… Court: “No Grounds for Terminating the Contract” According to Star News reporting on August 27, the Seoul Eastern District Court’s Civil Division 13 dismissed Mido’s claim that day in a lawsuit seeking the return of approximately ₩570 million in contract fees. Mido had signed an advertising-model contract with Kim Soo-hyun in 2020 and renewed it annually. In November 2024, the company paid ₩900 million to extend the contract for another year. However, after a scandal involving Kim Soo-hyun emerged, Mido terminated the contract and filed a lawsuit seeking the return of the portion of the contract fee corresponding to the remaining contract period. Mido argued: “Since the contract was terminated because the model’s commercial value was damaged, the contract fee should be returned on a prorated basis.” Gold Medalist, on the other hand, countered: “The controversy resulted from manipulated and false allegations made by a third party, rather than any culpable conduct on the part of the model himself.” The court rejected Mido’s argument. It reportedly determined that the circumstances did not constitute valid grounds for terminating the contract, and therefore dismissed Mido’s claim. 😂😂 #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #MidoLoss #SayNoToCyberBullying Here’s the link 🔗 https://t.co/9mSIuaAjo4

What a good day to be alive 🫠🫠 BREAKING NEWS 📰 🚨🗞️ Kim Soo-hyun’s Agency Wins ₩500 Million Contract Deposit Return Lawsuit… Court: “No Grounds for Terminating the Contract” According to Star News reporting on August 27, the Seoul Eastern District Court’s Civil Division 13 dismissed Mido’s claim that day in a lawsuit seeking the return of approximately ₩570 million in contract fees. Mido had signed an advertising-model contract with Kim Soo-hyun in 2020 and renewed it annually. In November 2024, the company paid ₩900 million to extend the contract for another year. However, after a scandal involving Kim Soo-hyun emerged, Mido terminated the contract and filed a lawsuit seeking the return of the portion of the contract fee corresponding to the remaining contract period. Mido argued: “Since the contract was terminated because the model’s commercial value was damaged, the contract fee should be returned on a prorated basis.” Gold Medalist, on the other hand, countered: “The controversy resulted from manipulated and false allegations made by a third party, rather than any culpable conduct on the part of the model himself.” The court rejected Mido’s argument. It reportedly determined that the circumstances did not constitute valid grounds for terminating the contract, and therefore dismissed Mido’s claim. 😂😂 #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #MidoLoss #SayNoToCyberBullying Here’s the link 🔗 https://t.co/9mSIuaAjo4

What a good day to be alive 🫠🫠 BREAKING NEWS 📰 🚨🗞️ Kim Soo-hyun’s Agency Wins ₩500 Million Contract Deposit Return Lawsuit… Court: “No Grounds for Terminating the Contract” According to Star News reporting on August 27, the Seoul Eastern District Court’s Civil Division 13 dismissed Mido’s claim that day in a lawsuit seeking the return of approximately ₩570 million in contract fees. Mido had signed an advertising-model contract with Kim Soo-hyun in 2020 and renewed it annually. In November 2024, the company paid ₩900 million to extend the contract for another year. However, after a scandal involving Kim Soo-hyun emerged, Mido terminated the contract and filed a lawsuit seeking the return of the portion of the contract fee corresponding to the remaining contract period. Mido argued: “Since the contract was terminated because the model’s commercial value was damaged, the contract fee should be returned on a prorated basis.” Gold Medalist, on the other hand, countered: “The controversy resulted from manipulated and false allegations made by a third party, rather than any culpable conduct on the part of the model himself.” The court rejected Mido’s argument. It reportedly determined that the circumstances did not constitute valid grounds for terminating the contract, and therefore dismissed Mido’s claim. 😂😂 #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #MidoLoss #SayNoToCyberBullying Here’s the link 🔗 https://t.co/9mSIuaAjo4

What a good day to be alive 🫠🫠 BREAKING NEWS 📰 🚨🗞️ Kim Soo-hyun’s Agency Wins ₩500 Million Contract Deposit Return Lawsuit… Court: “No Grounds for Terminating the Contract” According to Star News reporting on August 27, the Seoul Eastern District Court’s Civil Division 13 dismissed Mido’s claim that day in a lawsuit seeking the return of approximately ₩570 million in contract fees. Mido had signed an advertising-model contract with Kim Soo-hyun in 2020 and renewed it annually. In November 2024, the company paid ₩900 million to extend the contract for another year. However, after a scandal involving Kim Soo-hyun emerged, Mido terminated the contract and filed a lawsuit seeking the return of the portion of the contract fee corresponding to the remaining contract period. Mido argued: “Since the contract was terminated because the model’s commercial value was damaged, the contract fee should be returned on a prorated basis.” Gold Medalist, on the other hand, countered: “The controversy resulted from manipulated and false allegations made by a third party, rather than any culpable conduct on the part of the model himself.” The court rejected Mido’s argument. It reportedly determined that the circumstances did not constitute valid grounds for terminating the contract, and therefore dismissed Mido’s claim. 😂😂 #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #MidoLoss #SayNoToCyberBullying Here’s the link 🔗 https://t.co/9mSIuaAjo4

What a good day to be alive 🫠🫠 BREAKING NEWS 📰 🚨🗞️ Kim Soo-hyun’s Agency Wins ₩500 Million Contract Deposit Return Lawsuit… Court: “No Grounds for Terminating the Contract” According to Star News reporting on August 27, the Seoul Eastern District Court’s Civil Division 13 dismissed Mido’s claim that day in a lawsuit seeking the return of approximately ₩570 million in contract fees. Mido had signed an advertising-model contract with Kim Soo-hyun in 2020 and renewed it annually. In November 2024, the company paid ₩900 million to extend the contract for another year. However, after a scandal involving Kim Soo-hyun emerged, Mido terminated the contract and filed a lawsuit seeking the return of the portion of the contract fee corresponding to the remaining contract period. Mido argued: “Since the contract was terminated because the model’s commercial value was damaged, the contract fee should be returned on a prorated basis.” Gold Medalist, on the other hand, countered: “The controversy resulted from manipulated and false allegations made by a third party, rather than any culpable conduct on the part of the model himself.” The court rejected Mido’s argument. It reportedly determined that the circumstances did not constitute valid grounds for terminating the contract, and therefore dismissed Mido’s claim. 😂😂 #WeStandWithKimSooHyun #MidoLoss #SayNoToCyberBullying Here’s the link 🔗 https://t.co/9mSIuaAjo4