Top Tweets for #NoToChatcontrol

**Tweet 1** ⚡ *THE EU IS ABOUT TO LEGALIZE MASS SURVEILLANCE — AND SILENCE ANYONE WHO OBJECTS.* On 7 July 2026, the European Parliament will vote on an “urgent procedure” to revive Chat Control 1.0 — a law that mandates indiscriminate scanning of ALL private communications. The Parliament already rejected it twice — 311 votes against. But Parliament President Roberta Metsola is forcing a third vote under different rules. --- **Tweet 2** 📜 *THE PROCEDURAL TRICK: VOTE NOW, OR THE LAW PASSES WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT.* Under the “ordinary legislative procedure”, 361 votes (absolute majority) are needed to reject or amend the Council's position. If that threshold is not reached, the law is AUTOMATICALLY adopted. The vote is scheduled for Thursday — the last sitting day before summer recess, when most MEPs are absent. This is not democracy. This is a coup by procedure. --- **Tweet 3** 🔇 *MARTIN SONNEBORN TRIED TO STOP IT. METSOLA CUT HIS MICROPHONE.* On 6 July, MEP Martin Sonneborn and writer Sibylle Berg informed President Metsola in writing that forcing Chat Control through an urgent procedure violates Parliament's own rules of procedure. During the plenary session, Sonneborn attempted to raise the issue. After exactly 60 seconds, Metsola switched off his microphone. In a democracy, you debate. In a dictatorship, you silence. --- **Tweet 4** ⚖️ *INTERNATIONAL LAW: THIS IS A CLEAR VIOLATION.* A parliamentary question already established that Chat Control violates: - **Article 12 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights** (privacy) - **Article 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights** (respect for private communications) - **Articles 11, 16 and 54** of the Charter Mass, indiscriminate surveillance of all citizens — without suspicion, without judicial authorization — is **incompatible with international human rights law**. --- **Tweet 5** 🔍 *JUDICIAL INTERCEPTIONS vs. MASS SURVEILLANCE: THE DISTINCTION MATTERS.* In a functioning democracy, judicial wiretapping requires: - **Individual suspicion** (probable cause) - **Judicial authorization** (a judge signs off) - **Proportionality** (targeted, limited in scope) Chat Control requires **NONE of these**. It scans **everyone** — innocent and guilty alike. It treats all 450 million EU citizens as potential criminals. This is not law enforcement. This is **generalized suspicion** — the hallmark of authoritarian regimes. --- **Tweet 6** 🧠 *THE PRETEXT: “PROTECTING CHILDREN”. THE REALITY: MASS SURVEILLANCE.* The EU Commission's own 2025 evaluation report admitted: - **Total failure in data collection** - **Inability to link mass surveillance to actual convictions** - **Significant error rates in detection technologies** Child sexual abuse is a horrific crime. But using it as a pretext to dismantle privacy for 450 million people is **cynical and dangerous**. As one MEP put it: “Children are protected by smart enforcement, not by scanning the private messages of millions of innocent people.” --- **Tweet 7** 📉 *THE SECOND-ORDER EFFECT: THE END OF ENCRYPTION.* Tech experts warn that mandatory message scanning would effectively **end end-to-end encryption** in the EU. Signal's president stated: “You cannot create a backdoor that only lets the ‘good guys’ in.” Signal vowed to **cease operations in Europe** rather than comply. WhatsApp, Telegram, and others would face the same choice. The EU is about to destroy its own digital security — while claiming to protect it. --- **Tweet 8** ⚠️ *THE DOUBLE STANDARD: RULE OF LAW FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME.* The EU lectures the world on democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Yet: - It ignores its own Parliament's votes (rejected twice). - It uses procedural tricks to bypass democratic scrutiny. - It silences MEPs who raise legitimate objections. - It forces through mass surveillance without judicial oversight. **This is not the behavior of a democratic institution. This is the behavior of a regime that has lost its moral compass.** --- **Tweet 9** ✅ *FACT-CHECK: WHAT WE KNOW.* - Chat Control 1.0 expired in April 2026. - The Parliament rejected its extension in March (311 to 228). - President Metsola is forcing a third vote under urgent procedure. - 361 votes are needed to reject it — otherwise it passes automatically. - The vote is scheduled for the last day before summer recess. - MEP Sonneborn had his microphone cut after 60 seconds. - The law violates the UN Declaration and EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. - Mass surveillance without suspicion is incompatible with international law. --- **Tweet 10** ⚖️ *VERDICT: THE ANALYST DOES NOT JUDGE — HE OBSERVES A SYSTEMIC FAILURE.* The European Parliament is being bypassed by its own President. A rejected law is being forced through by procedural sleight of hand. Objections are silenced. The vote is scheduled when most MEPs are absent. Mass surveillance is being sold as child protection — without evidence, without proportionality, without judicial oversight. **This is not a democracy protecting its citizens. This is an institution afraid of its own people — using procedure to crush dissent and surveillance to control thought.** The EU that preaches freedom is building a surveillance state. The question is not whether it will pass — but whether Europeans will remember who voted for it when the microphones are turned off for good. --- 🧭 My work focuses on decision-oriented strategic analysis. Not commentary. Not advocacy. I analyze incentives, constraints, and second-order effects. ⚖️ Marco | Independent Analyst

Chat control moet helemaal gestopt worden. Het excuus waarmee Europa het nog steeds wil doorduwen - "Je kan toch niet tégen de strijd tegen kindermisbruik zijn?"- toont hoe enorm gevaarlijk het is. Mijn resolutie hierover is opnieuw uitgesteld. Moeilijk te begrijpen dat niet al onze politici hier vanuit onze parlementen een gezamenlijk statement over willen maken.