Top Tweets for #PLACES_OF_WORSHIP_ACT
@indiatvnews @peenaz_tyagi @adv_hsjain @ARanganathan72 Sir, could you please conduct research on the #Places_of_Worship_Act, specifically regarding its enactment date and whether the consent of all stakeholders involved in disputes was obtained, or if it was unilaterally imposed? #TUGKAKIfarman
#Jamiat’s Report Released on #BabriMasjidVerdict and #Places_of_Worship_Act, 1991
Important event on #Secularism and #Justice Organized by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind and SAMLA. Speakers assert no evidence that Babri Masjid Was Built after Demolishing a Temple and Demand Strict Enforcement of the Places of Worship Act, 1991
New Delhi, May 16, 2026: An important event was held at the Deputy Speaker Hall, Constitution Club of India, New Delhi, by the Justice and Empowerment of Minorities forum of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, in collaboration with the South Asian Minorities Lawyers Association (SAMLA), where a research report on the Babri Masjid verdict and the Places of Worship Act, 1991, was officially released.
The programme was presided over by president Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind Maulana Mahmood Madani and attended by eminent senior advocates, legal experts, former judges, and scholars from across the country.
The released report argues that the Places of Worship Act, 1991 holds central importance in protecting India’s secular structure, communal harmony, and constitutional stability by preventing the reopening of historical religious disputes. The report presents a detailed analysis of important Supreme Court judgments, particularly the Ismail Faruqui case (1994) and the M. Siddiq (Ayodhya Verdict 2019), arguing that the interpretation in the Ismail Faruqui judgment—which stated that a mosque is not an essential part of Islam—had deep implications for subsequent cases. The report recommends strict implementation of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, and strengthening the principles of secularism and religious equality.
Jamiat president Maulana Mahmood Asad Madani, in his keynote address after the release of the report, said that a serious and critical study of the Babri Masjid verdict was necessary so future generations could understand how one section of society presented its perspective in an academic and constitutional manner. He described the report as a sincere effort to protect India’s secular identity, constitutional values, and communal harmony.
Referring to the Babri Masjid case, he stated that there was no conclusive evidence proving that the mosque had been built after demolishing a temple, a fact acknowledged by the Supreme Court itself in paragraph 788 and related portions of the judgment. He further said that despite Muslims responding to the verdict with patience and constitutional commitment, fresh disputes concerning Gyanvapi, Mathura Eidgah, Kamal Maula Mosque, and other religious places were raised, turning the issue into a matter concerning India’s constitutional identity, judicial credibility, and the principles of justice.
Earlier, SAMLA Secretary General Advocate Firoz Ghazi delivered the welcome address and remarked that history always honors those who stand for justice, integrity, and human dignity. He expressed hope that constitutional morality and the principle of Satyameva Jayate would ultimately prevail.
Former Patna High Court Judge Justice Iqbal Ahmad Ansari praised Maulana Mahmood Madani for releasing the report. He stated that the real strength of a judge lies in conscience, fearlessness, and commitment to justice, because justice suffers when judges succumb to fear. Referring to the Babri Masjid case, he remarked that the court delivered merely a “decision,” not a true “judgment,” since a judgment requires sound reasoning, whereas a decision may simply reflect prevailing circumstances.
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising emphasized in her speech that the Babri Masjid verdict and the Places of Worship Act cases are not merely about one religious site or dispute, but concern the constitutional future of the country, equally affecting both Hindus and Muslims. She stressed that in a secular and democratic nation, the primary duty of judges is to decide cases according to the Constitution, law, and equality—not on the basis of religious belief.
Vice Chancellor of Chanakya National Law University Faizan Mustafa said that the Places of Worship Act, 1991, represents a constitutional effort to preserve the historical status of religious places in the country. However, he observed that the mere existence of a law is not in itself a complete guarantee. What is truly needed is the proper preservation of documents, historical records, and legal status relating to religious sites. He noted that while the court accepted several historical and legal aspects in the Babri Masjid case, there remains room for academic disagreement on certain observations. Therefore, he stressed the need for dialogue in resolving sensitive religious disputes rather than relying solely on judicial confrontation.
Senior lawyer Salman Khurshid stated that a significant portion of the Babri Masjid verdict actually supports the Muslim legal position. He pointed out that the ASI reports nowhere conclusively established that a temple had been demolished to construct the mosque. He further emphasized that sustainable solutions in the future can emerge not merely through legal or political means, but through dialogue, constructive engagement, and restoration of mutual trust.
Senior Advocate M. R. Shamshad warned that attempts to weaken the Places of Worship Act or create new disputes through ASI-related legal mechanisms could prove dangerous for the country’s secular and constitutional framework. He stressed that constitutional rights should not remain confined to books but must be effectively implemented in practice.
Senior Advocate Nizam Pasha said that mosques are symbols of the religious and historical identity of the Muslim community. He argued that the court accorded legal significance to the Hindu side’s belief, while the Muslim position was reduced merely to a place of worship, leading to debates over the essentiality of mosques in Islam. He added that although Muslims had fully presented arguments based on waqf and historical ownership, these important arguments were not discussed in detail in the judgment.
Senior Advocate Ejaz Maqbool remarked that if any historical wrong has occurred, it must be remembered and acknowledged honestly. Appreciating the efforts of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, he said that the foremost challenge facing Muslims today is the protection of their constitutional rights, particularly religious and educational freedoms guaranteed under Article 30 of the Constitution.
Research scholar Dr. Nizamuddin Ahmad Siddiqui elaborated on the background and context of the report. Advocate Rauf Rahim emphasized that the ongoing struggle for the protection of waqf properties has become extremely necessary in the current circumstances, while Advocate Tahir M. Hakim stressed the importance of justice and fairness at every level.
Among others present at the programme were Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind General Secretary Maulana Mohammad Hakimuddin Qasmi, Secretary Maulana Niaz Ahmad Farooqui, Advocate Rubina Javed, former SAMLA President Advocate J. H. Jafri, Advocate Rukhsana Chaudhary, Advocate Tayaab Khan, Advocate Mohammad Nurullah, Advocate A. Sirajuddin, and Professor Hasina Hashia of Jamia Millia Islamia University, Prof Mujibur Rahman Jamia Millia Islamia, Ovais Sultan Khan, Dr Shabbir Mushtaq along with several distinguished lawyers and scholars. The vote of thanks was delivered by Advocate Mansoor Ali Khan, while the proceedings were conducted by SAMLA President Advocate Nasir Aziz.
Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain Another Petition Challenging Places Of Worship Act: Allows Petitioner To Intervene In Pending Proceedings.
#SupremeCourt #Article91 #PlacesOfWorshipAct #CJI #cji
#PLACES_OF_WORSHIP_ACT
#CJISanjivKhanna #ChiefJustice
#ChiefJusticeofIndia
Supreme Court rejects fresh PIL against Places of Worship Act 1991
#Places_of_Worship_Act | #PoWA | #SupremeCourt | #PIL
https://t.co/CCaZirCoMF
CJI-led bench to hear PIL against Places of Worship Act tomorrow; Congress also petitioner supporting the Act
#Places_of_Worship_Act | #PoWA | #SupremeCourt | #Congress
https://t.co/EGRJTdU83E
Iqra Hasan वकील कपिल सिब्बल को लेकर पहुंची कोर्ट, CJI ने ऐसा कहा कि खूब हो रही चर्चा
@rajulkumarjha1 @RKJ006
#IqraHasan #Kairana #KairanaMP #places_of_worship_act #CJI #CJI #SanjivKhanna
#PLACES_OF_WORSHIP_ACT
Essential To Protect Communal Harmony : Congress Approaches
Supreme Court Supporting Places Of Worship Act.
#PlacesOfWorshipAct
#PLACESOFWORSHIPACT
#SupremeCourt #supremecourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia #CJI #cji #CJISanjivKhanna #Congress
#ChiefJusticeofIndia #ChiefJustice
सावधान..!!⚠️⚠️
सभी सनातनी भाईयों ये #सनातन विरोधी
#कांग्रेस पार्टी अब खुलकर #पूजा_स्थल
कानून को लेकर मुस्लिमों के समर्थन
और हिंदुओं के विरोध में आ गयी है...!!
#Places_of_worship_act
Places of Worship Act Challenge in SC: In overt ‘Anti-Hindu’ stance, Congress sides with AIMIM, Muslims
#Congress | #Places_of_Worship_Act | #PoWA | #HinduMandirs | #SupremeCourt
https://t.co/YDZw6JkGfU
@ajeetbharti @BJP4India "ये बातें पेट्रोल वाली मोटरसाइकिल में सौ ग्राम पेट्रोल डाल कर स्टार्ट करने के बाद, किरासन तेल से बाइक दौड़ा कर इंजन का सत्यानाश करने जैसा है।"
वाह अजीत भाई,क्या बढ़िया तुलना की है।👏👏
बीजेपी की कार्य प्रणाली, प्राथमिकताएं,कार्य की स्पीड सच में निराशाजनक है।#Places_of_worship_Act
खुन्दक खोदने वालों की जमात इस देश की तकदीर लिख रही है
वोट बैंक के चक्कर में देश बांटने की हो रही है कोशिश
##narendramodi , #chandrachud , #अडानी #आदिवासी #दंगा #दंगाई , #जस्टिस_चंद्रचूड़ , #india , #Places_of_Worship_Act
https://t.co/kEKikisgIE
@narendramodi सरकार को बहुत-बहुत बधाई। अच्छा होता यदि लगे हाथ #Places_Of_Worship_Act का बिल भी पेश हो जाता। जितना हंगामा होना है एक ही बार हो जाता।
@AmitShah @KirenRijiju @AshwiniUpadhyay @AshokShrivasta6 @AmanChopra_ @SushantBSinha @Bairagi_Panddit @Radhika_chhoti @PRPathak2
इंग्लिश से की शुरुआत फिर हिंदी पर आए, वक्फ बिल पर विपक्ष को ललन सिंह का जवाब.. ललन सिंह ने विपक्ष पर पलटवार करते हुए कहा कि -👇
ये बिल मुसलमान विरोधी नहीं है. ये मंदिर की बात करते हैं, मंदिर की बात कहां से आ गई. कोई भी संस्था जब निरंकुश होगी तो सरकार उस पर अंकुश लगाने के लिए, पारदर्शिता के लिए कानून बनाएगी. ये उसका अधिकार है. पारदर्शिता होनी चाहिए और ये बिल पारदर्शिता के लिए है. उन्होंने कहा कि ये अल्पसंख्यकों की बात करते हैं, सिखों का कत्लेआम किसने किया था.
#LalanSingh #Congress #WaqfBoardBill #Loksabha #ParliamentarySession #PMModi #WaqfActBill | #ZeeNews
#कांग्रेस ने मुसलमानों को खुश करने के लिए हिंदुओं के खिलाफ ही एक नही अनेक कारनामों को अंजाम दिया है।
#Muslim_Personal_Law_Board
#Waqf_Act
#Places_of_Worship_Act
जैसे अनेकों कानून कांग्रेस ने बना डाले जिनसे #हिंदुओं की संपत्ति या अधिकारों को छीनकर मुसलमानों के हवाले कर दिया गया।
कांग्रेस कह रही है कि हम लोगों की संपत्ति का सर्वे कराएंगे, फिर उसका बंदरबांट करेंगे...
What’s this tendency to explain #CAA, #EVM, #RamMandir and debate with any Tom, Dick and Harry Liberal ? They won’t be convinced.
Did they convince us when they brought #Partition, #Hindu_Code, #Waqf, #Places_of_Worship_act, #Article370, Distorted #History ?
#Modi #BJP4IND
#Places_of_Worship_Act should be SCRAPPED in totality. 😎
Repost if you agree!
#ReclaimTemples
#RewriteDistortedHistory
@TimesAlgebraIND Article 370..
I hope i coming days @BJP4India will take more such actions..
#Uniform_civil_code
#one_nation_one_election
#police_reforms
#places_of_worship_act
@ratna_bajpai @mediacrooks @narendramodi @narendramodi & @AmitShah don't want to offend the Muslims by revoking the #Places_Of_Worship_Act. It is foolish of them to expect votes from Muslims in the coming elections. They never voted for #BJP and they never will. Refrain from appeasement politics or lose elections.
Pls rmbr on #Places_of_Worship_Act
1) Our #Muslim bros should not be forced into a Panic Mode
2) Yes, we #Hindus have intense historic pain reg Kashi & Mathura
3) We need to find a balance with tolerance, respect & rights of everyone. #HinduMuslim ❤🇮🇳🙏
Centre can take its time but a stand has to be taken eventually. Plus, SC is also right in being cautious about fearing a floodgate of litigations if it's overturned. It's like a catch-22 situation: @RahulEaswar
@roypranesh | @prathibhatweets | @madhavgk
सुप्रीम कोर्ट में #Places_of_Worship_Act को चैलेंज किया की जिन मंदिरों के ऊपर अवैध रूप से मस्जिदें व चर्च बनाएँ गये - @AshwiniUpadhyay
@PMOIndia @HMOIndia @narendramodi @AmitShah @DattaHosabale @blsanthosh @Ramlal @vinod_bansal
@KapilMishra_IND @Lawyer_Kalpana
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.2M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.9M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers