#PeterOBrien - Twitter Hashtag

about 2 months ago

#OnThisDay 18 June 1996 📺TV Listings It's England v Holland in EURO 96. #PeterOBrien stars in medical drama CARDIAC ARREST. Cindy dents Ian's pride in #EastEnders. What's the truth about Frank and Kim's reconciliation in #Emmerdale? #AlfredMolina stars in REQUIEM APACHE.

TvDidYouSee's tweet photo. #OnThisDay 18 June 1996 📺TV Listings
It's England v Holland in EURO 96.
#PeterOBrien stars in medical drama CARDIAC ARREST.
Cindy dents Ian's pride in #EastEnders.
What's the truth about Frank and Kim's reconciliation in #Emmerdale?
#AlfredMolina stars in REQUIEM APACHE. https://t.co/qP9PBUzvWl

1

8

1

2

828

BeisbolPlay

@beisbolplaycom

almost 2 years ago

Peter O'Brien fue el jugador destacado de Magallanes con un cuadrangular del tres carreras en la octava entrada para liquidar el juego ante Leones 🚀💥⚓ Bateó de 4-1, CA, HR, 3CI Presentado por BNC Banco #LVBP #Magallanes #Beisbol #Venezuela #MVP #BNC #PeterOBrien

0

4

1

0

1K

BeisbolPlay

@beisbolplaycom

almost 2 years ago

Peter O´Brien impulsó dos carreras con doble 🥵🔥 #MAG 4-0 #ZUL | 3er inning 🔼 Disfruta los juego EN VIVO gratis en https://t.co/JqKxCS1CRr #LVBP #Magallanes #PeterOBrien #Highlight #Beisbol #Venezuela

0

6

1

0

788

Rosita Díaz

@RositaDaz48

almost 2 years ago

PENNYWISE; WONG’S MORAL RELATIVISM IS OFF THE SCALE #PeterOBrien ~The Spectator Australia, 5 October, 2024 ‘Wong’s Palestine Deadline’ grandly announced the headline in the Australian. That sounds like a global ground-breaking development. A line in the sand, perhaps? Wong, of course, is our Foreign Minister. A foreign minister has a formidable arsenal of diplomatic weapons at his or her disposal. Suppose, for example, a fighter jet from another country deploys chaff in front of one of our maritime patrol aircraft in international waters. The foreign minister could summon that country’s ambassador for a dressing-down. Or when confronted by an essentially anti-Semitic resolution at the UN he or she could vote against it. Or he or she could choose to withdraw funding to a putative aid organisation that is alleged to be assisting a terrorist group. And then there is the powerful last resort option – the MOAB of diplomatic strategies, if you like. The foreign minister can ‘call for’ things. Our Foreign Minister is trigger-happy to resort to this option. Hardly a week goes by without her ‘calling for’ a Palestinian state or a ceasefire in Gaza or Lebanon. And the best part about ‘calling for’ things is that you only have to specify an outcome. You don’t need to worry about how it might be achieved or at what cost. But it does show you really mean business. In commerce there is a concept called ‘the cost of doing business’. It refers to impositions that you would rather not have imposed upon you but there is little you can do about. For example, in certain countries paying bribes to government officials is regarded as part of the ‘cost of doing business’. A similar concept applies in geopolitics but only to one country. It is termed the ‘cost of being Israel’. Thus, when our increasingly disingenuous Foreign Minister calls for ‘both sides to de-escalate’, knowing full well that Hezbollah and Hamas have no intention of doing so, what she is saying is that Israel must defend itself only to the extent that things can quickly return to the pre-7 October status quo. In other words, business as usual, where Israel is expected to endure constant threat and denigration, and frequent attack, respond ‘proportionately’ and then retire to prepare for the next fixture in some kind of dystopian and deadly parody of a sporting competition They have been doing this for 75 years. Would we accept such a precarious existence for even ten? Wong quotes the figures of dead in Gaza and Lebanon as if they override every other consideration. Setting aside the fact that the numbers widely accepted are almost certainly exaggerated, I wonder if she’s heard of the civil war in Syria, which has claimed the lives of over 600,000 people, including an estimated 300,000 civilians, since 2011. Muslims killing Muslims, even on this scale, is little more than regrettable apparently. But that Israel should take the lives of any more than, say, 1,200 Palestinians – that would have been a proportional response and probably only barely tolerable to our intrepid Foreign Minister – is absolutely beyond the pale. Wong pays lip service to the fact that Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organisations. But she never mentions the fact that they started this war. The moral equivalence is off the scale. She says that Israel must abide by the rules of war. Memo to Wong, the rules of war do not dictate that civilians must not be killed. Merely that belligerent states must make every effort to avoid unnecessary civilian casualties. Israel has set the standard in this respect, even to the extent of sending warning to civilians of impending attacks, wherever possible. Warnings which must inevitably come to the notice of the enemy, and which must also inevitably increase the risk to Israeli soldiers. https://t.co/ouzE9d9RMb

RositaDaz48's tweet photo. PENNYWISE; WONG’S MORAL RELATIVISM IS OFF THE SCALE

#PeterOBrien ~The Spectator Australia,
5 October, 2024
‘Wong’s Palestine Deadline’ grandly announced the headline in the Australian. That sounds like a global ground-breaking development. A line in the sand, perhaps? Wong, of course, is our Foreign Minister. A foreign minister has a formidable arsenal of diplomatic weapons at his or her disposal. Suppose, for example, a fighter jet from another country deploys chaff in front of one of our maritime patrol aircraft in international waters. The foreign minister could summon that country’s ambassador for a dressing-down. Or when confronted by an essentially anti-Semitic resolution at the UN he or she could vote against it. Or he or she could choose to withdraw funding to a putative aid organisation that is alleged to be assisting a terrorist group.
And then there is the powerful last resort option – the MOAB of diplomatic strategies, if you like. The foreign minister can ‘call for’ things. Our Foreign Minister is trigger-happy to resort to this option. Hardly a week goes by without her ‘calling for’ a Palestinian state or a ceasefire in Gaza or Lebanon. And the best part about ‘calling for’ things is that you only have to specify an outcome. You don’t need to worry about how it might be achieved or at what cost. But it does show you really mean business.
In commerce there is a concept called ‘the cost of doing business’. It refers to impositions that you would rather not have imposed upon you but there is little you can do about. For example, in certain countries paying bribes to government officials is regarded as part of the ‘cost of doing business’. A similar concept applies in geopolitics but only to one country. It is termed the ‘cost of being Israel’. Thus, when our increasingly disingenuous Foreign Minister calls for ‘both sides to de-escalate’, knowing full well that Hezbollah and Hamas have no intention of doing so, what she is saying is that Israel must defend itself only to the extent that things can quickly return to the pre-7 October status quo. In other words, business as usual, where Israel is expected to endure constant threat and denigration, and frequent attack, respond ‘proportionately’ and then retire to prepare for the next fixture in some kind of dystopian and deadly parody of a sporting competition They have been doing this for 75 years. Would we accept such a precarious existence for even ten?
Wong quotes the figures of dead in Gaza and Lebanon as if they override every other consideration. Setting aside the fact that the numbers widely accepted are almost certainly exaggerated, I wonder if she’s heard of the civil war in Syria, which has claimed the lives of over 600,000 people, including an estimated 300,000 civilians, since 2011. Muslims killing Muslims, even on this scale, is little more than regrettable apparently. But that Israel should take the lives of any more than, say, 1,200 Palestinians – that would have been a proportional response and probably only barely tolerable to our intrepid Foreign Minister – is absolutely beyond the pale.
Wong pays lip service to the fact that Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organisations. But she never mentions the fact that they started this war.
The moral equivalence is off the scale.
She says that Israel must abide by the rules of war. Memo to Wong, the rules of war do not dictate that civilians must not be killed. Merely that belligerent states must make every effort to avoid unnecessary civilian casualties. Israel has set the standard in this respect, even to the extent of sending warning to civilians of impending attacks, wherever possible. Warnings which must inevitably come to the notice of the enemy, and which must also inevitably increase the risk to Israeli soldiers.
https://t.co/ouzE9d9RMb

4

24

7

2

910

Rosita Díaz

@RositaDaz48

almost 2 years ago

#PeterOBrien The news that campaign and gallantry medals will be stripped from a bevy of middle-ranking officers over allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, but that senior officer’s chest decorations were safe, was greeted with predictable contempt by many. As a former professional Army officer and Vietnam veteran, I share that contempt. https://t.co/duZf6j4Tcn

0

19

6

0

643

Rosita Díaz

@RositaDaz48

almost 2 years ago

Airbus Albo’s Flights of Fancy! #PeterOBrien Quadrant Online September 6, 2024 ~Let’s face it, all ~ OK, most politicians lie. Some more than others. They do so for three main reasons: personal survival, avoidance of judgement and ‘the end justifies the means’. In this essay I’m going to concentrate on the first two. I can envisage a situation where a politician lies to save his skin, or even to save himself embarrassment, in which a lie would be excusable. Say, for instance you are a politician who is also a closet gay and, for whatever reason, you do not wish this knowledge to become public. If your sexual preference does not adversely affect your ability to do your job then that would be justified, although it would carry the risk that you might eventually be exposed as not only gay but also a liar. But where the lie is designed to cover, or avoid taking responsibility for, a stuff-up, that is inexcusable. If we imagine a metric called the Pinocchio Scale, which measures the number of lies told by a politician as a percentage of his or her overall public statements, our current prime minister (for want of a better description), Airbus Albo, has moved well into uncharted territory. ~Is this one the dumbest statement Albanese has ever made? Albo goes from strength to strength in putting together vacuous and specious pronouncements in support of his policy of allowing Crown Ministers, carte blanche, to inflict onto this nation whatever damage their fecklessness and pandering to special interest groups entails. ~For example, we have him claiming that the Reserve Bank Board Governor did not say that Gov’t spending was a factor influencing inflation. ~We have him claiming that the process (such as it was) to issue tourist visas to people coming here from Gaza was exactly the same as when the Abbott government brought in refugees from Syria. ~We have numerous lies and prevarications regarding the Voice to Parliament referendum, such as that it had nothing to do with treaty, truth telling or the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s finer print. ~More recently, Albo claimed that those persons employed on the maintenance of USS Hawaii while the sub is in Australia, as well as those currently training to upkeep nuclear submarines as part of the AUKUS, were examples of his Future Made in Australia policy. ~Admittedly, this is not strictly a lie, it’s just gilding the lily. Nonetheless, it deserves to be called out. ~These are people being paid by the Australian government to acquire skills necessary in the defence of this country. ~They are not making anything. They are not producing wealth, they are consuming it, albeit necessarily and for a good cause. By his logic, every serviceperson, indeed every public service bureaucrat, would be a part of his pie-in-the-sky dreaming. However, one statement that has been let through to the keeper that has really got my goat relates to the Blayney gold mine fiasco. Sky News Australia reports: ~Addressing reporters over the weekend, the prime minister denied responsibility for his cabinet minister’s decision and said: ~ “The environment minister [Tanya Plibersek] is responsible.” ~Mr Albanese’s comments came after The Australian revealed Regis Resources had directly warned him in June that an Indigenous heritage ruling would render the project unviable. ~The prime minister has maintained intervening in Ms Plibersek’s decision would have breached legal protocols. ~ “The law says that the environment minister makes a decision and I don’t break the law,” Mr Albanese said. ~He emphasised that responsibility for the decision lay with Ms Plibersek under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. ~ “I don’t break the law.” •Is this the dumbest statement Albanese has ever made? It’s a big call on my part, I know, but I’m voting yes. It staggers me why the journalist did not follow up, or at least attempt to, and ask, “Prime Minister, what law would that be?

3

15

3

1

728

Save Redland Library @SaveRedlandLibr

about 2 years ago

9:05pm TODAY on @TalkingPicsTV From 1992, s1 Ep 1 of the #TrueCrime #Drama series 📺 #CrimeStory - “All Good Friends - The Case of the Handless Corpse” directed by #JulianJarrold & written by #FrankCottrellBoyce 🌟#SuzannePacker #MichelleChadwick #PeterOBrien #VictorMcGuire

SaveRedlandLibr's tweet photo. 9:05pm TODAY on @TalkingPicsTV

From 1992, s1 Ep 1 of the #TrueCrime #Drama series 📺 #CrimeStory - “All Good Friends - The Case of the Handless Corpse” directed by #JulianJarrold & written by #FrankCottrellBoyce

🌟#SuzannePacker #MichelleChadwick #PeterOBrien #VictorMcGuire https://t.co/1bduZIOdxy

1

5

2

0

3K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Next Week! Premiere series every Sunday, beginning Sunday 5th May, 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

0

23

4

0

5K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Next Week on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday, begins Sunday 5th May 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

0

11

0

5K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Next Week! Premiere series every Sunday, beginning Sunday 5th May, 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

1

40

11

1

7K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Coming this May on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday, begins Sunday 5th May 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

0

15

3

2

6K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Coming this May on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday, begins Sunday 5th May 9pm, CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

2

33

4

2

10K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Coming this May on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday, begins Sunday 5th May 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

2

48

11

0

6K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Coming this May on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday, begins Sunday 5th May 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

0

20

4

1

4K

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Coming this May on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday, begins Sunday 5th May 9pm CRIME STORY (1992). Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

3

59

8

2

6K

dianita sanchez @dahianneps

over 2 years ago

Pues en un gran evento y disfrutando de los @Pericos_Oficial Con mi amado #PeterOBrien #PericosDePuebla #Puebla

0

2

0

162

Talking Pictures TV

@TalkingPicsTV

over 2 years ago

Coming this May on #TalkingPicturesTV Premiere series every Sunday begins Sun-5-May 9pm CRIME STORY (1992) Dramatic reconstructions of some of Britain's most notorious crimes featuring #PeterOBrien #BernardHill #FayRipley #TrevorPeacock #DianeKeen and many more.

3

28

6

0

6K

CATRINA SCULLION @CatrinaSoprano

over 2 years ago

#sundaystyle comes to you courtesy of one of my besties @EmerBarrySop because she gave me this stunning dress!! Classic black & white & high street in #karenmillen dress, #peterobrien coat & #ninewest heels completed with my statement #redlip #soprano #classicstyle #monochrome