Top Tweets for #RGBMap

1 day ago

Thank you, @bitfinex. The original request came from @FedericoTenga; #RGBMap implemented it on the open standard as an independent team. We appreciate the attention from an exchange of your standing and will continue shipping reliable infrastructure for the #RGB ecosystem.

Bitfinex @bitfinex

2 days ago

@FedericoTenga @RGBMap_ 🤯

864

528

RGBMap

@RGBMap_

1 day ago

Thanks @FedericoTenga. One idea, and it shipped. That’s the bar. #RGBMap is in this for the long haul. More tools, more heat for RGB. We’ll keep going. #RGB 👊

Federico Tenga

@FedericoTenga

2 days ago

RGB builders community is amazing! Last week I shared an idea commenting a post, and now it's already delivered. Great job @RGBMap_

270

RGBMap

@RGBMap_

4 days ago

Most registries ask you to trust their index. Ours is built so you don't have to. #RGBMap publishes two things: the public identity of an #RGB asset, and the public segment of the ledger kept by the platforms that issue or list it. Anyone can publish under the same format, and anyone can rebuild the index from what has been published. It is a format and a set of rules. Not a chain, not a database. the index is not the source of truth where an index and a recomputation disagree, the recomputation wins Every byte an index names is fetched again and hashed again. A tampered index cannot make a check pass, because nothing it says is believed. What we never do, on purpose: decide whether an asset is safe merge statuses into one "verified" mark approve — registration is a signed declaration, and nobody reviews it delist — a conflict stays visible, with the conflict shown hold funds — custody stays with the platform know who is reading — no account, no session An index is replaceable, and it should be. Auditable is not trustless. #RGB #RGBMap

RGBMap_'s tweet photo. Most registries ask you to trust their index. Ours is built so you don't have to.

#RGBMap publishes two things: the public identity of an #RGB asset, and the public segment of the ledger kept by the platforms that issue or list it. Anyone can publish under the same format, and anyone can rebuild the index from what has been published.

It is a format and a set of rules. Not a chain, not a database.

the index is not the source of truth
where an index and a recomputation disagree, the recomputation wins

Every byte an index names is fetched again and hashed again. A tampered index cannot make a check pass, because nothing it says is believed.

What we never do, on purpose:

decide whether an asset is safe
merge statuses into one "verified" mark
approve — registration is a signed declaration, and nobody reviews it
delist — a conflict stays visible, with the conflict shown
hold funds — custody stays with the platform
know who is reading — no account, no session

An index is replaceable, and it should be. Auditable is not trustless.

#RGB #RGBMap

179

Top Tweets for #RGBMap

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users