Top Tweets for #ReviewerGuidelines

Mahla ✨ @mah_alizadeh

about 3 years ago

8/11 How can we improve #CitationalPractices? 🔹 Include guidelines for reviewers & offer training 🔹 Engage in dialogue with authors 🔹 Practice thoughtful citing – avoid bulk citations, break it down. #ThoughtfulCitations #ReviewerGuidelines

1

2

0

0

168

IOP Environment

@IOPenvironment

about 5 years ago

Are you a #reviewer? did you know we have a free support page for reviewers here: https://t.co/ZrV22J8bA7 Featuring #ReviewerGuidelines for IOP journals, IOP Publishing #ReviewerAwards, and information on ethics.

IOPenvironment's tweet photo. Are you a #reviewer? did you know we have a free support page for reviewers here: https://t.co/ZrV22J8bA7
Featuring #ReviewerGuidelines for IOP journals, IOP Publishing #ReviewerAwards, and information on ethics. https://t.co/YaTr9IcwY0

0

3

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #Day40_of_40 #Countdown_1_Days "Reviewers will work with Area Chairs to clear up confusions..CMT allows ACs to contact reviewers anonymously. Reviewers will be notified to respond. Identities of reviewers will be hidden from each other but not from AC." 40/40

0

4

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #Day39_of_40 #Countdown_2_Days @DickinsonSven: "Our conferences have become very competitive, leading reviewers to look for reasons to reject a paper rather than reasons to accept it.. A strong community is an inclusive one that welcomes participation". 39/N

1

7

1

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #Day38_of_40 #Countdown_3_Days @DickinsonSven:"Paper may not be competitive in our benchmark 'arena' but may offer great value to think differently or improve our understanding. Support diversity of ideas.. for a healthy community" https://t.co/gmELDRHIzK 38/N

1

4

1

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day37_of_40 #Countdown_4_Days @HoiemDerek:"Avoid putting weight on whether the topic is interesting. We tend to be biased towards hot topics &our own research areas.Nobody knows which directions will make biggest impact" https://t.co/kFJStpNOH6 37/N

1

7

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day36_of_40 #Countdown_5_Days @CordeliaSchmid "Baselines: [check for] missing or flawed baselines, baselines implemented without care with suboptimal results, weak baselines to show a bigger gap." https://t.co/vCmfuy2XR2 36/N

1

3

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day35_of_40 #Countdown_6_Days @MichaelGoesele: "To accept or not to accept- this is the Q. Your task is quality control. Are you unbiased? Aim for a strong well-justified opinion. Be critical &doubt anything you read." https://t.co/VkAa4Cw1Kc 35/N

1

4

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day34_of_40 #Countdown_7_Days K Schindler: "If the proposal is innovative, do not obsess about the numbers. Tuning will be crowd-sourced. Good numbers alone are not a sign novelty. Beware of fashion waves &tunnel vision" https://t.co/oEz6wfedjo 34/N

1

20

2

2

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day33_of_40 #Countdown_8_Days K Schindler: "Novelty isn't a stick to beat authors. We don't want trivial repetitions, but v few ideas are completely new. Novelty can be new question/solution or better analysis/results". https://t.co/oEz6wfedjo 33/N

1

12

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day32_of_40 #Countdown_9_Days @ftmguney: "Three pillars of reviewing: critical thinking (can it be done better?), constructive input (how to do it?), empathy (how to say it?). Audience: Authors, ACs, fellow reviewers." https://t.co/c3JNjIu80R 32/N

1

11

1

1

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day31_of_40 #Countdown_10_Days @jponttuset: "Classify your comments into major/minor. Explain and justify your opinion very didactically. Do not assume background or prior knowledge. Nobody said Reviewing was easy..." https://t.co/CqPbgK2Drf 31/N

1

8

2

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day30_of_40 Confidentiality: The review process is confidential. Reviewers are volunteers, not part of the ICCV organisation and their efforts are greatly appreciated. All reviewers information is kept confidential during and after the review. 30/N

1

5

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day29_of_40 If you passed/shared the review with a member of your team, please provide their name (only accessible to ACs and PCs). We'll give them the credit they deserve and it assists the AC in linking the review to the reviewer's expertise. 29/N

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day29_of_40
If you passed/shared the review with a member of your team, please provide their name (only accessible to ACs and PCs). We'll give them the credit they deserve and it assists the AC in linking the review to the reviewer's expertise.
29/N https://t.co/xTVpGFcMsD

1

6

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day28_of_40 If you have any concerns about the paper, or your assessment of it, feel free to share these with the ACs in this private section (not visible to authors) or email the AC directly trough CMT. Keep your professional language pls. 28/N

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day28_of_40
If you have any concerns about the paper, or your assessment of it, feel free to share these with the ACs in this private section (not visible to authors) or email the AC directly trough CMT. Keep your professional language pls.
28/N https://t.co/6n9xV6JXmm

1

4

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day27_of_40 Confidence score: should combine your knowledge in the specific area/problem, exposure to related/prior work **and** understanding of the manuscript. This differs per-paper and is not a reflection of your general knowledge solely. 27/N

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day27_of_40
Confidence score: should combine your knowledge in the specific area/problem, exposure to related/prior work **and** understanding of the manuscript. This differs per-paper and is not a reflection of your general knowledge solely.
27/N https://t.co/6if8cgnsMW

1

4

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day26_of_40 Reviewers are invited to comment on the reproducibility of the paper - whether code is provided, promised or sufficient details are included to reproduce the method and/or results. An option is added for theoretical papers. 26/40

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day26_of_40
Reviewers are invited to comment on the reproducibility of the paper - whether code is provided, promised or sufficient details are included to reproduce the method and/or results. An option is added for theoretical papers.
26/40 https://t.co/NXnzpkNzrs

2

5

0

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day25_of_40 Detailed comments: be constructive and generous. Provide suggestions for the authors to make their manuscript clearer, stronger and more impactful. Reserve your list of typos and minor edits to the detailed comments section. 25/N

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day25_of_40
Detailed comments: be constructive and generous. Provide suggestions for the authors to make their manuscript clearer, stronger and more impactful.
Reserve your list of typos and minor edits to the detailed comments section.
25/N https://t.co/1K4hPBcWh8

1

6

1

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day24_of_40 Overall rating: ACs &authors reading your strengths&weaknesses should understand your rating. Minor weakness cannot justify a reject! Borderline should be reserved to ambiguous cases (option only available for pre-rebuttal rating). 24/N

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day24_of_40
Overall rating: ACs &authors reading your strengths&weaknesses should understand your rating.
Minor weakness cannot justify a reject!
Borderline should be reserved to ambiguous cases (option only available for pre-rebuttal rating).
24/N https://t.co/TfOAOYQvQu

1

10

1

0

0

ICCV2021 @ICCV_2021

about 5 years ago

#ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day23_of_40 Under weaknesses, indicate *key concerns*, that if addressed appropriately in the rebuttal, will influence you to change your rating. Recall: rebuttal is 1-page for all reviewers' concerns. Guide authors to your prime Qs/concerns. 23/N

ICCV_2021's tweet photo. #ReviewerGuidelines #ICCV2021 #Day23_of_40
Under weaknesses, indicate *key concerns*, that if addressed appropriately in the rebuttal, will influence you to change your rating. Recall: rebuttal is 1-page for all reviewers' concerns. Guide authors to your prime Qs/concerns.
23/N https://t.co/dfkRwMwSil

2

2

0

0

0

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users