#Sacketts - Twitter Hashtag

about 1 year ago

Still available: The Sacketts (DVD, 1979, Full Screen, 2-disc) New & sealed! Starring Tom Selleck & Sam Elliott. $8.47 shipped! #eBay #eBayDeals #BuyItNow #Media #TVonDVD #TV #TheSacketts #Sacketts #TomSelleck #SamElliot #DVD #eBaySeller #eBayStore https://t.co/4qbS0dbRtz

0

2

0

36

Lew's Hobby Stuff

@fuchinkans

about 1 year ago

Still available: The Sacketts (DVD, 1979, Full Screen, 2-disc) New & sealed! Starring Tom Selleck & Sam Elliott. $8.47 shipped! #eBay #eBayDeals #BuyItNow #Media #TVonDVD #TV #TheSacketts #Sacketts #TomSelleck #SamElliot #DVD #eBaySeller #eBayStore https://t.co/4qbS0dbRtz

0

3

0

36

Louis L'Amour

@Louis_LAmour

over 1 year ago

This photo is from the Sackett set in Old Tucson; Louis and the Sackett brothers, Orrin, Tyrel and Tell. And NOW you can save over 30% on your order of the Sackett 17 novel set. Share the Adventure! https://t.co/F5fkUXd7TC #louislamour #westerns #sacketts

Louis_LAmour's tweet photo. This photo is from the Sackett set in Old Tucson; Louis and the Sackett brothers, Orrin, Tyrel and Tell.
And NOW you can save over 30% on your order of the Sackett 17 novel set.
Share the Adventure! https://t.co/F5fkUXd7TC
#louislamour #westerns #sacketts https://t.co/drkVHhmrkG

2

51

5

0

520

yungenchee.bsky.social @YungEnChee1

about 3 years ago

A most disturbing development (in the US) & the dark money behind it #Sacketts #CleanWaterAct #Wetlands #Waterways #Catchments #Headwaters

0

3

2

1

415

Victoria Taft, The Adult in the Room, FITF Squad

@VictoriaTaft

about 3 years ago

Huge win for the #Sacketts of Idaho at the Supreme Court today. #SCOTUS "In sum, we hold that the CWA extends to only those “wet- lands with a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right,” so that they are “indistinguishable” ...The wetlands on the Sacketts’ property are distinguishable We reverse the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and remand the case for fur- ther proceedings consistent with this opinion. @hughhewitt https://t.co/aZLxyYENBT

2

9

1

0

311

Poochie

@Poochie024

over 3 years ago

@DrCharlesButler @MightyLabsDAO @MightyDylanK @EKC_DAO @Sagitta36011186 @ratking8888 This looks awesome!!! Long time fan of the old west and everything there in. Have read every Louis L’Amour book multiple times. #Sacketts #Sheriffs #OldWest #Pioneers #NFTs

1

5

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

@DamienSchiff @DamienSchiff: The #Sacketts had no notice that their property was a wetland before they purchased it.

1

2

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

@DamienSchiff #Gorsuch: Why not just look at geographic proximity between property and Priest Lake (a navigable water). There is a circuitous route from #Sacketts' property to lake. You're blocked from the lake by some houses. Why isn't that close enough?

1

2

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

@DamienSchiff #Kagan: What's the #Sacketts' "back-up" position? @DamienSchiff: Our test is the line-drawing test.

1

2

3

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

@DamienSchiff #Sotomayor: Even #Sacketts' test will have some ambiguity. But the #EPA allows you to ask. So, notice is not a problem. @DamienSchiff: True, but that indicates why "significant nexus" test is so problematic. What other law requires such an expensive process to test jurisdiction?

2

5

4

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

@DamienSchiff #ACB: If we adopt #Sacketts' test, can Congress never regulate wetlands? @DamienSchiff: No. Congress can regulate "adjacent" -- physically abutting -- wetlands.

1

4

3

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

@DamienSchiff says that #Sacketts' property is not even water. Step 1.

1

2

1

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

The courts below applied the “significant nexus” test and held that the #Sacketts' property -- which allegedly includes a wetland -- is part of the “waters of the United States.” #SCOTUS agreed to hear the case -- 10 years after its first decision in this case.

1

5

2

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

Property owners need a permit to discharge, among other things, “dredged or fill material” into “navigable waters.” #404Permit. The #Sacketts' use of fill material on their property would require a permit -- but only if their property is a #WOTUS (water of the U.S.).

1

4

2

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

The #Sacketts' first #SCOTUS victory was over ten years ago. Since then, they've litigated whether their property is in fact a "water of the United States" under the #CleanWaterAct. #WOTUS.

1

8

1

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

The #EPA refused to hear the Sacketts' arguments contesting the #wetland determination. The #Sacketts, represented by my firm @PacificLegal, sued. The US Supreme Court held -- unanimously -- that the #EPA had to give the Sacketts a hearing. https://t.co/MMIwCrFpyn

1

9

3

0

Oliver Dunford @ojdunford

over 3 years ago

The #Sacketts have been trying to build a house in a residential neighborhood for 15 years. The #EPA and #ArmyCorps claim that their property is a #wetland, in which case the property could be regulated as a "water of the United States." #WOTUS.

1

7

3

0