Top Tweets for #TotalAwareness

3Tier Services aka: “Safety Steve”

@3TierServices

8 days ago

Parents teach your kids #SelfDefense #TotalAwareness 🔫🗡️⚖️🇺🇸🗽👊🏼💥💔😓🤬

Blue Lives Matter

@bluelivesmtr

9 days ago

🚨Pennsylvania has CONVICTED a black man, Marson Weh, of first-degree m*rder in the 11-wound st*bbing of a white 15-year-old, Michael Garr. ⠀ A Delaware County jury returned the verdict Thursday after about 30 minutes. Weh, 26, of Clifton Heights, was also found guilty of possessing an instrument of crime. ⠀ Garr was a sophomore at Upper Darby High School. He was walking home from his girlfriend’s house on the 200 block of Bridge Street in Drexel Hill on April 21, 2023. ⠀ Prosecutors said Weh followed him for more than a mile on camera, then st*bbed and slashed him 11 times. A forensic pathologist testified one wound to the throat severed his trachea. ⠀ A driver who came up Bridge Street about a minute later said Garr ran to the car with his hands on his throat and could not speak. Blood sprayed when he moved his hands. ⠀ District Attorney Tanner Rouse told jurors the two had “no earthly connection.” No motive was established. ⠀ Garr’s blood was on Weh��s clothing. Rouse told the jury the folding knife still had the boy’s blood down in the handle. ⠀ Weh had been wanted in Ohio on as$ault and stolen-vehicle charges. He pleaded guilty there and took 9½ years before Pennsylvania brought him back. ⠀ Police also tied him to a February 2023 st*bbing of a PREGNANT WOMAN at Bishop Hill Apartments in Upper Darby. That attempted-m*rder case is set for next month. ⠀ At the defense table Wednesday, a microphone caught Weh saying, “I am the k*ller of Michael Garr. I am, in fact, guilty.” ⠀ First-degree m*rder in Pennsylvania carries life without parole. Sentencing is set for November. ⠀ Upper Darby Police Superintendent Timothy Bernhardt said, “Justice finally caught up to the monster who stole Michael’s life.” ⠀ #Pennsylvania #UpperDarby

bluelivesmtr's tweet photo. 🚨Pennsylvania has CONVICTED a black man, Marson Weh, of first-degree m*rder in the 11-wound st*bbing of a white 15-year-old, Michael Garr.
⠀
A Delaware County jury returned the verdict Thursday after about 30 minutes. Weh, 26, of Clifton Heights, was also found guilty of possessing an instrument of crime.
⠀
Garr was a sophomore at Upper Darby High School. He was walking home from his girlfriend’s house on the 200 block of Bridge Street in Drexel Hill on April 21, 2023.
⠀
Prosecutors said Weh followed him for more than a mile on camera, then st*bbed and slashed him 11 times. A forensic pathologist testified one wound to the throat severed his trachea.
⠀
A driver who came up Bridge Street about a minute later said Garr ran to the car with his hands on his throat and could not speak. Blood sprayed when he moved his hands.
⠀
District Attorney Tanner Rouse told jurors the two had “no earthly connection.” No motive was established.
⠀
Garr’s blood was on Weh��s clothing. Rouse told the jury the folding knife still had the boy’s blood down in the handle.
⠀
Weh had been wanted in Ohio on as$ault and stolen-vehicle charges. He pleaded guilty there and took 9½ years before Pennsylvania brought him back.
⠀
Police also tied him to a February 2023 st*bbing of a PREGNANT WOMAN at Bishop Hill Apartments in Upper Darby. That attempted-m*rder case is set for next month.
⠀
At the defense table Wednesday, a microphone caught Weh saying, “I am the k*ller of Michael Garr. I am, in fact, guilty.”
⠀
First-degree m*rder in Pennsylvania carries life without parole. Sentencing is set for November.
⠀
Upper Darby Police Superintendent Timothy Bernhardt said, “Justice finally caught up to the monster who stole Michael’s life.”
⠀
#Pennsylvania #UpperDarby

318

14K

173

Samarthguru Dhara @sgdharaofficial

3 months ago

🌹 क्या साक्षी में विचार होते हैं? जानें समर्थगुरू सिद्धार्थ औलिया जी से इस वीडियो में: https://t.co/OPrjK0vWsq @SiddharthAulia Ji #Samarthguru #totalawareness #spirituality #spiritual #life #spiritualgrowth

664

Samarthguru Dhara @sgdharaofficial

3 months ago

🏵 साक्षी और तटस्थता में क्या अन्तर है? जानें समर्थगुरू सिद्धार्थ औलिया जी से इस वीडियो में: https://t.co/Uief1uf6qU @SiddharthAulia Ji #Samarthguru #totalawareness #spirituality #spiritualgrowth #spiritual #life

853

Samarthguru Dhara @sgdharaofficial

3 months ago

🏵 साक्षी और प्रेम कैसे संबन्धित हैं? जानें समर्थगुरू सिद्धार्थ औलिया जी से इस वीडियो में: https://t.co/Mxh4qKYrJ3 #Samarthguru #spirituality #totalawareness #spiritual #life #spiritualgrowth

968

Krishnadev Satyarthi

@KrisBhattarai

3 months ago

Osho, what is the difference in experience between satori – in zen, a glimpse of enlightenment – and samadhi, cosmic consciousness? #Osho #TheWitnessingSeer #ConsciousAlertness #TotalAwareness Samadhi begins as a gap, but it never ends. A gap always begins and ends – it has boundaries: a beginning and an end – but samadhi begins as a gap and then is everlasting. There is no end to it. So if the happening comes as a gap and there is no end, it is samadhi, but if it is a complete gap – with a beginning and an end – then it is satori, and that is different. If it is just a glimpse, just a gap, and the gap is again lost, if something is bracketed and the bracket is complete – you peep into it and come back, you jump into it and come back – if something happens and it is again lost, it is satori. It is a glimpse, a glimpse of samadhi, but not samadhi. Samadhi means the beginning of knowing, without any end. In India we have no word that corresponds to satori, so sometimes, when the gap is great, one can misunderstand satori as samadhi. But it never is; it is just a glimpse. You have come to the cosmic and looked into it, and then everything is gone again. Of course, you will not be the same; now you will never be the same again. Something has penetrated into you, something has been added to you, you can never be the same again. But still, that which has changed you is not with you. It is just a remembrance, a memory. It is only a glimpse… The moment samadhi has happened, the future becomes nonexistential. It is not; only the present moment is. It is the only time, there is not even any past. The past has dropped and the future also, and a single, momentary existence becomes the total existence. You are in it, but not as an entity that is different from it… Samadhi is not a glimpse, samadhi is a death. But satori is a glimpse, not a death. And satori is possible through so many ways. An aesthetic experience can be a possible source for satori; music can be a possible source for satori; love can be a possible source for satori. In any intense moment in which the past becomes meaningless, in any intense moment when you are existing in the present – a moment of either love or music or poetic feeling, or of any aesthetic phenomenon in which the past doesn’t interfere, in which there is no desire for the future – satori becomes possible. But this is just a glimpse. This glimpse is meaningful, because through satori you can feel for the first time what samadhi can mean. The first taste, or the first distinct perfume of samadhi, comes through satori. So satori is helpful; but anything that is helpful can be a hindrance if you cling to it and you feel that it is everything. Satori has a bliss that can fool you; it has a bliss of its own. Because you have not known samadhi, this is the ultimate that comes to you, and you cling to it… Satori is meaningful, but just as a glimpse, as a breakthrough, as a single, momentary breakthrough into the existence, into the abyss… A demanding mind becomes closed, and the glimpse is shut off. It always comes when you are not aware of it, when you are not looking for it – when you are relaxed, when you are not even thinking about it, when you are not even meditating… Osho Excerpts from: Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy, Chap #16: The Difference Between Satori & Samadhi https://t.co/YW98Rqj9uR

KrisBhattarai's tweet photo. Osho,
what is the difference in experience between satori – in zen, a glimpse of enlightenment – and samadhi, cosmic consciousness?

#Osho
#TheWitnessingSeer
#ConsciousAlertness
#TotalAwareness

Samadhi begins as a gap, but it never ends. A gap always begins and ends – it has boundaries: a beginning and an end – but samadhi begins as a gap and then is everlasting. There is no end to it.

So if the happening comes as a gap and there is no end, it is samadhi, but if it is a complete gap – with a beginning and an end – then it is satori, and that is different.

If it is just a glimpse, just a gap, and the gap is again lost, if something is bracketed and the bracket is complete – you peep into it and come back, you jump into it and come back – if something happens and it is again lost, it is satori. It is a glimpse, a glimpse of samadhi, but not samadhi.

Samadhi means the beginning of knowing, without any end. In India we have no word that corresponds to satori, so sometimes, when the gap is great, one can misunderstand satori as samadhi.

But it never is; it is just a glimpse. You have come to the cosmic and looked into it, and then everything is gone again. Of course, you will not be the same; now you will never be the same again.

Something has penetrated into you, something has been added to you, you can never be the same again. But still, that which has changed you is not with you. It is just a remembrance, a memory. It is only a glimpse…

The moment samadhi has happened, the future becomes nonexistential. It is not; only the present moment is. It is the only time, there is not even any past. The past has dropped and the future also, and a single, momentary existence becomes the total existence. You are in it, but not as an entity that is different from it…

Samadhi is not a glimpse, samadhi is a death. But satori is a glimpse, not a death. And satori is possible through so many ways. An aesthetic experience can be a possible source for satori; music can be a possible source for satori; love can be a possible source for satori.

In any intense moment in which the past becomes meaningless, in any intense moment when you are existing in the present – a moment of either love or music or poetic feeling, or of any aesthetic phenomenon in which the past doesn’t interfere, in which there is no desire for the future – satori becomes possible.

But this is just a glimpse. This glimpse is meaningful, because through satori you can feel for the first time what samadhi can mean. The first taste, or the first distinct perfume of samadhi, comes through satori.

So satori is helpful; but anything that is helpful can be a hindrance if you cling to it and you feel that it is everything. Satori has a bliss that can fool you; it has a bliss of its own. Because you have not known samadhi, this is the ultimate that comes to you, and you cling to it…

Satori is meaningful, but just as a glimpse, as a breakthrough, as a single, momentary breakthrough into the existence, into the abyss…

A demanding mind becomes closed, and the glimpse is shut off. It always comes when you are not aware of it, when you are not looking for it – when you are relaxed, when you are not even thinking about it, when you are not even meditating…

Osho
Excerpts from: Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy, Chap #16: The Difference Between Satori & Samadhi https://t.co/YW98Rqj9uR

824

Krishnadev Satyarthi

@KrisBhattarai

3 months ago

Osho, What is the difference between awareness and witnessing? #Osho #TheWitnessingSeer #ConsciousAlertness #TotalAwareness There is much difference between awareness and witnessing. Witnessing is still an act; you are doing it, the ego is there. So the phenomenon of witnessing is divided between the subject and the object. Witnessing is a relationship between subject and object. Awareness is absolutely devoid of any subjectivity or objectivity. There is no one who is witnessing in awareness; there is no one who is being witnessed. Awareness is a total act, integrated; the subject and the object are not related in it; they are dissolved. So awareness doesn’t mean that anyone is aware, nor does it mean that anything is being attended to. Awareness is total – total subjectivity and total objectivity as a single phenomenon – while in witnessing a duality exists between subject and object. Awareness is nondoing; witnessing implies a doer. But through witnessing awareness is possible, because witnessing means that it is a conscious act; it is an act, but conscious. You can do something and be unconscious – our ordinary activity is unconscious activity – but if you become conscious in it, it becomes witnessing. So from ordinary unconscious activity to awareness there is a gap that can be filled by witnessing. Witnessing is a technique, a method toward awareness. It is not awareness, but, as compared to ordinary activity, unconscious activity, it is a higher step. Something has changed: activity has become conscious, unconsciousness has been replaced by consciousness. But something more still has to be changed. That is, the activity has to be replaced by inactivity. That will be the second step. It is difficult to jump from ordinary, unconscious action into awareness. It is possible but arduous, so a step in between is helpful. If one begins by witnessing conscious activity, then the jump becomes easier – the jump into awareness without any conscious object, without any conscious subject, without any conscious activity at all. This doesn’t mean that awareness isn’t consciousness; it is pure consciousness, but no one is conscious about it. There is still a difference between consciousness and awareness. Consciousness is a quality of your mind, but it is not your total mind. Your mind can be both conscious and unconscious, but when you transcend your mind, there is no unconsciousness and no corresponding consciousness. There is awareness. Awareness means that the total mind has become aware. Now the old mind is not there, but there is the quality of being conscious. Awareness has become the totality; the mind itself is now part of the awareness. We cannot say that the mind is aware; we can only meaningfully say that the mind is conscious. Awareness means transcendence of the mind, so it is not the mind that is aware. It is only through transcendence of the mind, through going beyond mind, that awareness becomes possible… Osho Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy, Chap #15: Consciousness, Witnessing & Awareness https://t.co/YW98Rqj9uR

KrisBhattarai's tweet photo. Osho,
What is the difference between awareness and witnessing?

#Osho
#TheWitnessingSeer
#ConsciousAlertness
#TotalAwareness

There is much difference between awareness and witnessing. Witnessing is still an act; you are doing it, the ego is there. So the phenomenon of witnessing is divided between the subject and the object.

Witnessing is a relationship between subject and object. Awareness is absolutely devoid of any subjectivity or objectivity. There is no one who is witnessing in awareness; there is no one who is being witnessed.

Awareness is a total act, integrated; the subject and the object are not related in it; they are dissolved.

So awareness doesn’t mean that anyone is aware, nor does it mean that anything is being attended to.

Awareness is total – total subjectivity and total objectivity as a single phenomenon – while in witnessing a duality exists between subject and object.

Awareness is nondoing; witnessing implies a doer. But through witnessing awareness is possible, because witnessing means that it is a conscious act; it is an act, but conscious.

You can do something and be unconscious – our ordinary activity is unconscious activity – but if you become conscious in it, it becomes witnessing.

So from ordinary unconscious activity to awareness there is a gap that can be filled by witnessing.

Witnessing is a technique, a method toward awareness. It is not awareness, but, as compared to ordinary activity, unconscious activity, it is a higher step. Something has changed: activity has become conscious, unconsciousness has been replaced by consciousness.

But something more still has to be changed. That is, the activity has to be replaced by inactivity. That will be the second step.

It is difficult to jump from ordinary, unconscious action into awareness. It is possible but arduous, so a step in between is helpful.

If one begins by witnessing conscious activity, then the jump becomes easier – the jump into awareness without any conscious object, without any conscious subject, without any conscious activity at all.

This doesn’t mean that awareness isn’t consciousness; it is pure consciousness, but no one is conscious about it.

There is still a difference between consciousness and awareness. Consciousness is a quality of your mind, but it is not your total mind.

Your mind can be both conscious and unconscious, but when you transcend your mind, there is no unconsciousness and no corresponding consciousness. There is awareness.

Awareness means that the total mind has become aware. Now the old mind is not there, but there is the quality of being conscious. Awareness has become the totality; the mind itself is now part of the awareness.

We cannot say that the mind is aware; we can only meaningfully say that the mind is conscious. Awareness means transcendence of the mind, so it is not the mind that is aware.

It is only through transcendence of the mind, through going beyond mind, that awareness becomes possible…

Osho
Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy, Chap #15: Consciousness, Witnessing & Awareness https://t.co/YW98Rqj9uR

791

Marina Jacobi

@MarinaJacobi

7 months ago

True awareness means combining all spectrums of information into one clear picture, and always leading with a solution. #TotalAwareness #ConsciousCreation #MarinaJacobi Full video: https://t.co/VXbDHdKcm5

175

Krishnadev Satyarthi

@KrisBhattarai

8 months ago

#Osho #ConsciousAlertness #TheWitnessingSelf #TotalAwareness Consciousness is a quality of the mind, awareness is the transcendence; it is going beyond the mind. Mind, as such, is the medium of duality, so consciousness can never transcend duality. It is always conscious of something, and there is always someone who is conscious. So consciousness is part and parcel of the mind, and mind, as such, is the source of all duality, of all divisions, whether they are between subject and object, activity or inactivity, consciousness or unconsciousness… If you begin to be conscious, you achieve witnessing. If you on begin to be conscious of your acts, conscious of your day-to-day happenings, conscious of everything that surrounds you, then you begin to witness. Witnessing comes as a consequence of consciousness. You cannot practice witnessing; you can only practice consciousness. Witnessing comes as a consequence, as a shadow, as a result, as a byproduct. The more you become conscious, the more you go into witnessing, the more you come to be a witness. So consciousness is a method to achieve witnessing. And the second step is that witnessing will become a method to achieve awareness. So these are the three steps: consciousness, witnessing, awareness. But where we exist is the lowest rank: that is, in unconscious activity. Unconscious activity is the state of our minds…. Through consciousness you can achieve witnessing, and through witnessing you can achieve awareness, and through awareness you can achieve “no achievement.” Through awareness you can achieve all that is already achieved. After awareness there is nothing; awareness is the end. Awareness is the end of spiritual progress; unawareness is the beginning… If you become one hundred percent conscious, you become a witness, a sakshi. If you become a sakshi, you have come to the jumping point from where the jump into awareness becomes possible. In awareness you lose the witness and only witnessing remains: you lose the doer, you lose the subjectivity, you lose the egocentric consciousness. Then consciousness remains, without the ego. The circumference remains without the center. This circumference without the center is awareness. Consciousness without any center, without any source, without any motivation, without any source from which it comes – a “no source” consciousness – is awareness. So you move from the unaware existence that is matter, prakriti, towards awareness. You may call it the divine, the godly, or whatever you choose to call it. Between matter and the divine, the difference is always of consciousness. Osho Excerpts from: Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy, Chap #15: Consciousness, Witnessing & Awareness https://t.co/YW98Rqj9uR

KrisBhattarai's tweet photo. #Osho
#ConsciousAlertness
#TheWitnessingSelf
#TotalAwareness

Consciousness is a quality of the mind, awareness is the transcendence; it is going beyond the mind. Mind, as such, is the medium of duality, so consciousness can never transcend duality. It is always conscious of something, and there is always someone who is conscious.

So consciousness is part and parcel of the mind, and mind, as such, is the source of all duality, of all divisions, whether they are between subject and object, activity or inactivity, consciousness or unconsciousness…

If you begin to be conscious, you achieve witnessing. If you on begin to be conscious of your acts, conscious of your day-to-day happenings, conscious of everything that surrounds you, then you begin to witness.

Witnessing comes as a consequence of consciousness. You cannot practice witnessing; you can only practice consciousness.
Witnessing comes as a consequence, as a shadow, as a result, as a byproduct. The more you become conscious, the more you go into witnessing, the more you come to be a witness.

So consciousness is a method to achieve witnessing. And the second step is that witnessing will become a method to achieve awareness.

So these are the three steps: consciousness, witnessing, awareness. But where we exist is the lowest rank: that is, in unconscious activity. Unconscious activity is the state of our minds….

Through consciousness you can achieve witnessing, and through witnessing you can achieve awareness, and through awareness you can achieve “no achievement.” Through awareness you can achieve all that is already achieved. After awareness there is nothing; awareness is the end. Awareness is the end of spiritual progress; unawareness is the beginning…

If you become one hundred percent conscious, you become a witness, a sakshi. If you become a sakshi, you have come to the jumping point from where the jump into awareness becomes possible. In awareness you lose the witness and only witnessing remains: you lose the doer, you lose the subjectivity, you lose the egocentric consciousness. Then consciousness remains, without the ego. The circumference remains without the center.

This circumference without the center is awareness. Consciousness without any center, without any source, without any motivation, without any source from which it comes – a “no source” consciousness – is awareness.

So you move from the unaware existence that is matter, prakriti, towards awareness. You may call it the divine, the godly, or whatever you choose to call it. Between matter and the divine, the difference is always of consciousness.

Osho
Excerpts from: Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy, Chap #15: Consciousness, Witnessing & Awareness https://t.co/YW98Rqj9uR

855

SOBER - John Perks

@frontwish

9 months ago

There are many distractions in today’s world, many adults have the concentration level of an infant. The art of conversation is dying amongst the younger generation. We must become aware of the path we are taking. #Mindfulness #totalawareness

Top Tweets for #TotalAwareness

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users