Top Tweets for #copavwright

Many suspect that the 26.9 BTC paid to the Genesis block was a deposit Dr. Wright made to satisfy the court-ordered security for costs of the core developers of BTC. There are good reasons: The total amount is close (the total security deposit proposed by the court was £900,000, about $1.15 million, a very close match to the value of 26.9 BTC at the time of transfer), and the whole incidence has an air of peculiarity that is hard to put aside as accidental or irrelevant. But here is something to think about. If this is indeed a security deposit Dr. Wright made for the core developers, it effectively works as a catch-22 for them. The Catch-22: if the core developers win the case in the courtroom, they must lose the case outside the courtroom. This is because the security deposit is only relevant if the core developers win the case. But with the security deposit made into the Satoshi addressed in the Genesis block, the core developers will face a dilemma: Dr. Wright will have to transfer the funds from the Genesis block to them if he loses the case in the courtroom. But if he does, he would effectively overthrow the judgment by showing that he is Satoshi outside the courtroom. (Unlike Bitcoin transactions with IDs firewalled from the blockchain, a transfer from a Binance account presumably has an associated identity because Binance is now under government supervision. Therefore, this transfer sequence would be proof of identity.) However, here is the trouble with the above theory: The manner in which the security deposit is made cannot be unilaterally chosen by Dr. Wright in this case. It must be agreed upon by core developers. How could the core developers agree to such a deposit, which works as a catch-22 for them? It is like they are hoping to win the case based on untruth but to get the security deposit from the truth that repudiates the untruthful verdict. It is literally self-repudiating, at least in the moral sense. It would be equivalent to publicly proclaiming, "We know he's Satoshi, but we win and it is the only thing we care!" They certainly cannot be that hideously cynical, can they? From a more benign view, perhaps they just wanted it to be a hedge against this particular scenario: Dr. Wright wins the case when he really is not Satoshi. In that case, Dr. Wright would have to take a loss of the coins deposited in the Genesis block because he wouldn't have the keys to access the coins. It's sort of like a penalty for an unjustified win. But that would be a week hedge. If Dr. Wright wins the case, losing a million dollars will be nothing to him. Besides, if Dr. Wright wins the case, he most likely has the key anyway. The whole thing makes sense if Dr. Wright initiated it, but makes little sense if the core developers accepted it. It is a mystery.