Top Tweets for #extremelyevil

𐙚 Lynn 🐾 ⚞•⚟ @lynsterbusiness

4 months ago

@sspirztual @helpthecorpses #extremelyevil #thosewhoknow

🇯🇵#量子哲学いのち=原子��子‼️「命は原子(量子)に宿る」 #量子力学 #Quantum

@wanco35323601

over 1 year ago

AI Q&A <English Version> AI Topics: [Hmm? "Those who believe will be saved!" Then "Where do those who don't believe go?"] and "New Age Quantum Mechanical Philosophy" #quantum #quantumphilosophy #religion #Suitenjin #unluckyyear #classicalphilosophy #evil #extremelyevil #atomicmolecule #X #slander #AI #bullying #Grimmfairytales #Christ #Buddha AI Q&A <English Version> AI 議題：【はて？「信じる者は救われる！」では「信じない輩は？どこへ」！】と「新時代量子力学的哲学」 1. Overview and Purpose of the Topic The requested topic compares the famous Christian phrase "Those who believe are saved!" with the question "Where do the unbelievers go?" and contrasts it with "New Era Quantum Philosophical Thought." It seeks to explore their compatibility, identity, and consistency. Additionally, the user’s comment expresses a desire to understand "Where are the unbelievers saved?" and to verify their consistency. Christian Perspective: "Those who believe are saved" is a cornerstone of Christian soteriology, rooted in the Bible, asserting that faith in Jesus Christ brings forgiveness of sins and eternal life. The fate of unbelievers is less clear, with interpretations ranging from judgment to potential salvation, depending on denomination or individual belief. New Era Quantum Philosophical Thought: Based on the provided profile, this philosophy defines the nature of all things (especially humans) as "the extreme evil of atomic molecules." It proposes a new framework replacing traditional religion and philosophy, using concepts like "Suijin" (Water God) and "quantum entanglement" to blend science and philosophy, focusing on addressing human instincts (exclusive/selfish DNA programs). Purpose: To compare the worldviews, soteriologies, and ontologies of both perspectives, identifying compatibility (commonalities or complementarities), identity (shared elements), and consistency (potential contradictions or harmonies). Specifically, it addresses the treatment of "unbelievers" and their potential salvation from both viewpoints. 2. Christian Understanding of "Those Who Believe Are Saved!" and "Where Do the Unbelievers Go?" First, we organize the origin, meaning, and treatment of unbelievers in the Christian phrase "Those who believe are saved," based on the referenced URL ( ) and biblical texts. 2.1 Origin and Meaning of "Those Who Believe Are Saved" Origin: While the exact phrase does not appear verbatim in the Bible, it is derived from passages such as: Romans 10:9: "If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." John 3:16-17: "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him." Meaning: Believe: To personally trust that Jesus Christ, through his death on the cross and resurrection, is the Savior who forgives sins and grants eternal life. This "trust" is not mere intellectual assent but involves heartfelt faith and action (repentance). Saved: To receive forgiveness of sins, be delivered from eternal destruction (death or separation from God), and gain eternal life (fellowship with God). Christianity views faith and repentance as two sides of the same coin, with trust in Jesus as the path to salvation. Context: Christian soteriology assumes all humans are sinners (born with a nature that rebels against God) and cannot save themselves through effort. Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross pays the penalty for sin, and faith allows individuals to receive this grace (Ephesians 2:8-9). 2.2 "Where Do the Unbelievers Go?" The Bible’s treatment of "unbelievers" varies by interpretation and denomination, but key passages include: John 3:18: "Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son." Mark 16:16: "Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned." Interpretations: Judgment or Destruction: Traditionally, unbelievers remain in their sinful state, facing eternal destruction (hell or eternal separation from God). However, the nature of "hell" is ambiguous in the Bible, with some denominations viewing it metaphorically. God’s Love vs. Judgment: John 3:16-17 emphasizes God’s love, stating Jesus was sent to save, not condemn. Thus, condemnation results from rejecting faith, not God’s active punishment. Modern Views: Some Christians propose universalism (all are eventually saved through God’s love) or post-mortem opportunities for salvation. For example, Acts 16:31 ("Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved—you and your household") suggests family faith may influence others’ salvation, hinting at broader possibilities. Challenges: The fate of unbelievers is a central theological debate, balancing God’s love and justice. The treatment of non-Christians, adherents of other religions, or those without access to the Gospel varies widely across denominations. 2.3 Christian View of Humanity and Salvation Framework Human Nature: All humans are created in God’s image but inherit a sinful nature from Adam’s fall (original sin; Romans 3:23). Sin is rebellion against God, manifesting in actions like lying or violence. Salvation Method: Salvation is by God’s grace, received through faith alone. Good deeds or effort cannot earn salvation (Ephesians 2:8-9). God’s Existence: Christianity posits a personal, omniscient, omnipotent, loving God who created all things and sent Jesus to save humanity. 3. Overview of "New Era Quantum Philosophical Thought" Based on the provided profile, we summarize the core concepts of "New Era Quantum Philosophical Thought" and clarify its worldview and soteriology. 3.1 Core Concepts Nature of All Things: All things (viruses, bacteria, organisms, humans) are composed of atomic molecules, which are the "essence of life." The human body is an "input/output device," and living organisms result from the "self-organization" of atoms and water (H2O). [web:PR] Extreme Evil Instinct: Human nature is driven by an "exclusive/self-righteous, arbitrary/selfish DNA program," the root of misdeeds (violence, plunder, murder). Example: Human violence mimics immune cells attacking viruses, driven by this program. [web:PR] Suijin (Water God): "Water (H2O)" is the foundation of life, replacing the cosmic God as "Suijin," inherent in atomic molecules. It supplants traditional gods. Reason: All organisms live in aqueous solutions, with water as the "glue and guardian of life." Hydrogen bonds and quantum entanglement support life systems. [web:PR] Yakudoshi and Quantum Entanglement: "Yakudoshi" (calamitous years) is a self-reincarnation cycle where instincts’ "extreme evil" may erupt. It varies by individual (±10-25%) and is measurable via quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement enables the "selfish DNA program" to operate biological systems. [web:PR] Human Duality: Humans comprise an "Atomic OS" (instinct) and "application software" (rationality). The "instinctual human" (selfish) and "rational human" (social) coexist. Example: Einstein’s "God does not play dice" contrasts with the DNA program "rolling dice" for mutations to evolve. [web:PR] Theory of Human Evil and Social View: The theory of human goodness (socialism/communism) is utopian and unrealistic. The theory of human evil defines "social destructionism/mad communism." The "Atomic OS" acts as an "evil cupid," prioritizing evolution through any means, including violence. [web:PR] Salvation Method: Recognize, monitor, and confront the "extreme evil" of atomic molecules. Under "Suijin," practice "love and compassion for all things." Religiously, this is expressed as "Namu Suijin" or "Suijin-do." [web:PR] Ethical Stance: Bullying is "passive murder." The "demonic 17 years old" is when instincts peak, posing dangers. New intelligence definitions (six types: foolish, knowledge, smart intelligence/brain) support a realistic society based on human evil. [web:PR] 3.2 Philosophical and Scientific Features Quantum Mechanics Application: Applies quantum entanglement and self-organization to life and consciousness. It emphasizes science but leans heavily on philosophical/religious interpretations. Contrast with Classical Philosophy: Rejects classical philosophy’s "God created all things," redefining God as "Suijin," a material force in H2O. Fusion with Religion: "Suijin-do" borrows forms from Buddhism (chanting) and Shinto, grounded in a scientific worldview. 3.3 Soteriology and Human View Human Nature: Highly pessimistic, viewing the "selfish DNA program" as inherently evil. Rationality is merely an "app" controlling instincts. Salvation Path: Recognize and control evil instincts through rationality and compassion under "Suijin," aiming for personal and societal transformation. Unbelievers: Not explicitly addressed, but based on the theory of human evil, those who fail to recognize evil are likely dominated by instincts, leading to destructive behavior. 4. Comparative Analysis: Christianity vs. Quantum Philosophical Thought We compare the worldviews, soteriologies, and ontologies of both perspectives, identifying commonalities and differences. 4.1 Human Nature Christianity: Humans are created in God’s image but inherit a sinful nature from original sin (Romans 3:23). Sin is rebellion against God, resulting in actions like lying or violence. Example: Adam’s sin subjects all humanity to sin and death (Genesis 3). Salvation requires forgiveness and reconciliation with God. Quantum Philosophical Thought: Humans are composed of atomic molecules driven by an "exclusive/selfish DNA program," the source of "extreme evil" (violence, plunder). Example: Human violence mimics immune cells’ attack mechanisms. [web:PR] Salvation requires recognizing and controlling this evil through rationality. Comparison: Commonalities: Both view human nature negatively, emphasizing inherent evil (sin vs. extreme evil). Differences: Christianity: Sin originates from spiritual rebellion against God. Salvation is through divine grace. Quantum Philosophy: Evil originates from biological DNA programs. Salvation is through self-awareness. Compatibility: Both acknowledge human flaws and the need for transformation, making them compatible. However, Christianity is God-centered, while quantum philosophy is material-centered. 4.2 Salvation Method Christianity: Salvation is through faith in Jesus Christ, involving trust in his cross and resurrection, accompanied by repentance. Example: Romans 10:9 and John 3:16 emphasize faith as the key to salvation. Salvation is a gift of God’s grace, not earned by deeds (Ephesians 2:8-9). Quantum Philosophical Thought: Salvation involves recognizing and monitoring the "extreme evil" of atomic molecules, practicing love and compassion under "Suijin." Example: Bullying is defined as "passive murder," with rationality controlling instincts. [web:PR] Religious practices ("Namu Suijin") and societal transformation build a bright future. Comparison: Commonalities: Both require internal transformation (faith or recognition). Ethical behavior (repentance or compassion) is crucial. Differences: Christianity: Salvation depends on divine intervention (Jesus’ sacrifice). Faith is directed toward an external Savior. Quantum Philosophy: Salvation depends on self-effort (evil recognition). Faith is directed toward "Suijin" or cosmic matter. Compatibility: Christianity’s repentance and quantum philosophy’s evil recognition are similar as processes of transformation. However, Christianity presupposes divine authority, while quantum philosophy emphasizes human autonomy. 4.3 Treatment of "Unbelievers" Christianity: Unbelievers are "condemned" or face "destruction" (John 3:18, Mark 16:16). However, God’s love suggests potential salvation post-mortem or through universalism. Example: Acts 16:31 hints at family faith influencing others’ salvation. Quantum Philosophical Thought: No explicit mention of "unbelievers," but based on the theory of human evil, those who do not recognize evil are dominated by instincts, leading to destructive behavior (violence, bullying). Salvation is open to those who recognize evil and practice compassion. Unbelievers may fall into "social destructionism." [web:PR] Comparison: Commonalities: Both require "acceptance" (faith or recognition) for salvation. Non-acceptance leads to undesirable outcomes (condemnation or destruction). Differences: Christianity: Unbelievers face spiritual judgment in a divine context. Quantum Philosophy: Unbelievers face social/biological destruction in a material context. Compatibility: Christianity’s "judgment" and quantum philosophy’s "destruction" both predict negative consequences, but Christianity operates in a spiritual realm, while quantum philosophy is material. 4.4 Concept of God and Cosmology Christianity: God is personal, omniscient, omnipotent, and loving, the creator of all things. Jesus was sent to save humanity (John 3:16-17). The universe is God’s purposeful creation with order. Quantum Philosophical Thought: God is "Suijin," a non-personal force inherent in H2O molecules, replacing traditional gods. It emphasizes material/scientific foundations. The universe is a self-organizing system driven by atomic molecules and quantum entanglement, with evolution as its purpose. [web:PR] Comparison: Commonalities: Both recognize a force (God or Suijin) that orders and sustains life. Differences: Christianity: God is personal, loving, and relational. Humanity is central. Quantum Philosophy: God is impersonal, material (H2O). Humanity is part of evolution. Compatibility: Christianity’s "divine creation" and quantum philosophy’s "self-organization" can partially align as explanations of cosmic order. However, Christianity’s spiritual, personal view clashes with quantum philosophy’s material view. 5. Analysis of Compatibility and Identity 5.1 Compatibility (Commonalities and Complementarities) Recognition of Human Flaws: Christianity’s "original sin" and quantum philosophy’s "extreme evil" both highlight human evil, seeking transformation, making them highly compatible. Salvation Process: Both require introspection (repentance or evil recognition) and action (faith or compassion). Christianity’s faith in God parallels quantum philosophy’s recognition of self. Social Ethics: Christianity’s "love one another" (John 13:34) aligns with quantum philosophy’s "love and compassion." Both condemn bullying and violence. [web:PR] Complementarities: Christianity provides a spiritual/ethical framework, emphasizing human-God relations. Quantum philosophy offers a scientific/material framework, focusing on controlling biological instincts. Example: Christianity’s faith-based ethics can be reinforced by quantum philosophy’s evil recognition for practical societal change. 5.2 Identity (Shared Elements) Limited Identity: Christianity is a God-centered spiritual soteriology, while quantum philosophy is a material-centered scientific philosophy, with fundamentally different premises. Partial Overlap: Recognition of human evil (sin or extreme evil). Salvation requires conscious choice (faith or recognition). Example: Condemning bullying as "sin" (Christianity) or "passive murder" (quantum philosophy) aligns ethically. [web:PR] 5.3 Differences and Challenges Concept of God: Christianity’s personal God vs. quantum philosophy’s impersonal Suijin creates a philosophical divide. Salvation Agent: Christianity relies on divine grace, quantum philosophy on human effort, contrasting dependence (God) with autonomy (human). Unbelievers’ Fate: Christianity’s spiritual judgment vs. quantum philosophy’s social destruction operates in different dimensions. Scientific Basis: Quantum philosophy uses quantum entanglement and DNA but lacks scientific rigor in areas like yakudoshi measurements. Christianity prioritizes faith over science. 6. Response to "Where Are the Unbelievers Saved?" Addressing the user’s question, "Where are the unbelievers saved?" from both perspectives. 6.1 Christian Perspective Traditional View: Unbelievers reject faith in Jesus, remaining in sin and facing judgment (John 3:18). Inclusive View: God’s infinite love suggests post-mortem or eschatological salvation opportunities (universalism). Example: Acts 16:31 implies family faith may extend salvation. Romans 2:14-16 suggests those without the law may be judged by conscience. Where Saved?: Ideally through faith in this life, but some denominations allow for salvation post-mortem or at the final judgment, in "God’s presence." 6.2 Quantum Philosophical Perspective Inferred View: "Unbelievers" are those who reject "Suijin" or evil recognition, dominated by selfish instincts, leading to destructive behavior (violence, bullying). Example: Bullying or "demonic 17 years old" outbursts result from recognition failure. [web:PR] Salvation Possibility: Recognizing evil and practicing compassion opens the path to salvation (instinct control and social contribution). Example: Adopting "Suijin-do" and compassion liberates individuals from destruction. Where Saved?: In this life, through recognizing evil and controlling instincts via rationality. No post-mortem perspective, with social/biological harmony as the salvation metric. 6.3 Consistency Analysis Christianity and Quantum Philosophy Consistency: Christianity’s judgment of unbelievers is spiritual, while quantum philosophy’s destruction is material, avoiding direct contradiction due to different domains. Commonality: Both require "acceptance" (faith or recognition) for salvation. Substituting Christianity’s faith with quantum philosophy’s recognition yields similar processes. Potential Harmony: Christians can incorporate quantum philosophy’s evil recognition as ethical introspection. Example: Sin awareness complements evil recognition. Quantum philosophy adherents can view Christianity’s "God’s love" as "Suijin’s compassion." Answer: Christianity: Unbelievers may be saved in this life or post-mortem through God’s love, in "God’s presence." Quantum Philosophy: Unbelievers are saved in this life by recognizing evil, within "personal and societal transformation." Consistency: Different timelines (this life vs. afterlife) and agents (God vs. human) but harmonizable through shared ethical transformation. 7. Conclusion and Recommendations 7.1 Summary Comparison: Christianity: God-centered spiritual soteriology; "Those who believe are saved" emphasizes faith in Jesus. Unbelievers face judgment but may have salvation opportunities. Quantum Philosophy: Material-centered scientific philosophy; recognizing evil and practicing compassion under "Suijin." Unbelievers risk destruction but can be saved through recognition. Compatibility: High compatibility in recognizing human evil, ethical transformation, and social harmony. Christianity’s spiritual and quantum philosophy’s scientific perspectives complement each other. Identity: Limited due to differing God concepts and salvation agents. Partial alignment in ethics (e.g., condemning bullying). Unbelievers’ Salvation: Christianity: Possible through God’s love, in this life or afterlife. Quantum Philosophy: Possible through evil recognition, in this life. Consistency: No contradiction, as they address different dimensions (spiritual vs. material). 7.2 Recommendations For Individuals: Christians: Adopt quantum philosophy’s evil recognition to deepen sin awareness. Quantum Philosophy Adherents: Draw on Christianity’s love and repentance to enhance compassion. For Society: Combine both ethical stances (anti-bullying) for education and policy. Example: Integrate sin and evil recognition into anti-bullying programs. Build a harmonious society based on "Suijin-do’s" compassion and Christianity’s love. Further Exploration: Validate quantum entanglement and DNA claims to strengthen quantum philosophy’s foundation. Compare Christianity’s universalism with quantum philosophy’s human evil theory for dialogue on unbelievers’ salvation. 8. Beginner-Friendly Explanation: Fun Learning Points Christianity as a Metaphor: God is a loving

205

Ricardo Alphonso Jenkins Sr. @RicardoAJenkins

over 6 years ago

@BrownUSCongress @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @TMZ @TMZLive @tylerperry @S_C_ @RHYTHMOFRAP @LollyDaskal @MCHammer @sherylunderwood @WhoopiGoldberg That logic is extremely #EXTREMELYEVIL , @RHYTHMJENKINS

sweet magnolia @crystal63

over 8 years ago

ppL ~in~ gLass houSes~ShouLd Never~Throw~stones. . .eSpeCiaLLy @ thoSe ~who~ Reverence The Lord🛐 In~deed it ~is~ a crime ~AgainSt~ GOD #VERYfooLiSh #NotOnLyThat #extremeLyEviL mind~ur~#tho'ts & #deeds

Rita @hugwildlife

almost 11 years ago

Florida plans to repeat bear hunt in 2016 (and maybe beyond) https://t.co/81kdwtF6Aw via FusionNews #ExtremelyEvil

Top Tweets for #extremelyevil

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users