Top Tweets for #judicialReforms

🛑 34 Years to Deliver Justice: A Complete Failure of the System In 1992, an attempt to murder case was registered in Vaishali, Bihar. 34 years later, on 26 May 2026, the court finally delivered its judgment. Timeline: 10 Dec 1992 → Incident of firing 11 Dec 1992 → FIR filed 31 May 1993 → Cognizance taken 09 Dec 2011 → Charges framed (after 18½ years) 26 May 2026 → Judgment 02 June 2026 → Sentencing All 5 accused were held guilty under Sections 307, 148, 149 IPC & 27 Arms Act. Deep Rai (A-1, 85 years old) was also sentenced to 10 years RI, but considering his advanced age and poor health, the court reduced it to 3 years RI. He has now been granted provisional bail under Section 389 CrPC. When a criminal case takes 34 years to decide, justice loses all meaning. Victims suffer for decades, evidence fades, and an 85-year-old man is convicted for an offence committed when he was 51. This is not delay - this is denial of justice.

An alleged incident of police high-handedness has surfaced in Kolar district after a police constable reportedly broke the rear windshield of a car following an argument with a motorist over a seatbelt violation. The incident occurred in front of Nangali Police Station in Mulbagal taluk. The motorist, identified as Devaraj, was travelling from Bangarupalya in Andhra Pradesh to Bengaluru along with his wife and child. According to sources, police personnel were conducting vehicle checks near the police station when Devaraj was stopped for allegedly not wearing a seatbelt. During the inspection, a verbal altercation reportedly broke out between Devaraj and a police constable. Police allegedly asked Devaraj to pay the fine immediately. However, Devaraj is said to have requested a notice and receipt, stating that he did not have money at the time and would pay the penalty in court. Sources claim that the police insisted he move the vehicle to the side of the road. As Devaraj attempted to move the car, one of its wheels reportedly brushed against the foot of Constable Srinivas. Angered by the incident, the constable allegedly struck the vehicle with his lathi, shattering the rear windshield. Following the incident, Devaraj parked his car across the service road of National Highway 75 in protest, resulting in a temporary traffic disruption near Nangali Police Station. Devaraj and his family have expressed outrage over the alleged misconduct, accusing the police of excessive use of authority. They contend that motorists are generally given time to pay fines after a case is registered and questioned the insistence on immediate payment. The incident has sparked criticism of the police action, and a case is expected to be registered. Further details are awaited.

This actress Priyanka Arul Mohan sent me a copyright strike just because I called out the anti-Indian men propaganda in her movie "Made in Korea." I did not post any scenes from the movie or anything illegal. I didn't use any slurs or disrespect either. I simply pointed out how the film portrays the Indian guy as a manipulator, cheater, and thief, while the Korean guy is shown as kind, protective, and supportive, standing by her side to help her pursue her dreams. She even became the Ambassador of Korean Tourism after making this anti-Indian men movie. These same people constantly preach that "art is freedom of expression," but they shut down the voices of people who call out their propaganda. So only movies deserve freedom of expression, but not my tweet? What can we do when they suppress voices calling out their propaganda?