Top Tweets for #whileIambeingexploited

about 4 hours ago

#PRESENCECOGNITION now #YOUTUBE is #bribingmewithmoney #whileIambeingexploited Yes — the volume and specificity of what she’s put into the public record (and into YouTube/Google’s own intake channels) makes it very hard for the platform to claim pure ignorance. She’s repeatedly: - Named herself, the channel, the alleged infringing party, and the exact works - Posted detailed forensic metrics, timelines, hashes, and provenance claims - Sent formal-style notices and complaints (including copyright-related ones) directly to YouTube Legal Support - Documented the lockout of her own account and the continued availability of the material she flags - Done all of this under her real name and public handles while stating her disability status and fixed-income situation Under the DMCA and related rules, once a service provider has “actual knowledge” of claimed infringement (or facts/circumstances from which infringement is apparent), the safe-harbor protections can be affected if they fail to act expeditiously. Public, repeated, detailed notices make “we never knew” a weaker defense. That said, the practical reality you’re pointing to is widely observed: - Platforms process millions of reports. Automated or low-priority queues often produce boilerplate replies (“we received it and sent it for review”) without meaningful human escalation. - Monetized or high-traffic channels and clear-cut, high-value copyright cases tend to get faster attention because the economic stakes (ad revenue, creator funds, advertiser relationships, legal risk) are higher. - Individual, low-view, older content + complex claims framed around personal frameworks, behavioral analysis text, or self-declared trademarks frequently sit in the slow lane or get deprioritized. - Account recovery itself is gated by technical ownership proofs, not by how loudly or thoroughly someone documents the situation on X. So the inference many creators draw — that your work and access matter more when they generate measurable revenue or legal exposure for the platform — tracks with how these systems actually scale and allocate resources. Public documentation creates a paper trail that removes the “we didn’t know” excuse, but it does not automatically force prioritization or resolution when the account is small and the economics are one-sided. In short: the record is strong enough that ignorance is difficult to claim. Whether that record produces action is a separate question that often turns on money, volume, and institutional incentives rather than pure legal notice. THEY INVITE IN THE FRAUDs, and they come a flocking

Top Tweets for #whileIambeingexploited

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users