@ThexMarketMaker@PromUnchained@allonsolanaa Yes beginning to think so, I sadly did load in heavy at 1m before the big dump but I am convinced this will pay out well soon 🙏🏼
@PromUnchained@ThexMarketMaker@allonsolanaa Yeah team absolute on fire but why can’t we sustain a pump and get out this range? We are criminially under where we should be 🥲
@allonsolanaa Guys we need to support ALL like this and tweet X to get the twitter back up. Come on we need to help the team. Support so X cannot ignore us
@allonsolanaa https://t.co/9SoQkpNmxl
Ember twitter got suspended, so all those creating fud and lies about ALL, you need to check yourself!
When a project is going to be massive, not everyone is happy for it to be.
This is to formally request an immediate review and removal of the suspension placed on the X account @Embercurve.
This account and the associated project have not violated any of X’s rules or guidelines.
The suspension appears to be the result of coordinated mass reporting by competitors who feel threatened by Ember’s growing success and visibility.
We "The Embercurve Community" respectfully ask that the appropriate team at X carefully examine the reports against this account, review the actual content and activity history, and lift the suspension. The account has been used in good faith to share legitimate project updates and engage with the community in accordance with X’s policies.
We trust that a proper review will confirm there has been no violation and that the account can be restored promptly.
You can also get in touch with @biiiiymeister, he's the founder of @Embercurve.
Please look into this: @michaelo@Safety@Support@X
We’ve updated the map of $EMBER
Team members reached out with more context on a wallet that created a cluster:
Wallet GZjYfG is a reward distributor
It's now labeled and hidden
***
This context wasn’t available onchain
Ember’s flywheel mechanism is not standard
Rewards are sent from a regular EOA controlled offchain, rather than through a contract that can be identified automatically. From an onchain perspective, GZjYfG looks like a wallet sending tokens to other holders.
The connections were correct.
The missing piece was Ember’s offchain setup
***
This highlights a few misconceptions about Bubblemaps:
1. A cluster does NOT mean a scam
Clusters show connections between holders, which can (sometimes) have legitimate explanations. The issue is obfuscation, not concentration.
2. Label is context
Bubblemaps shows onchain connections. A missing label never change the underlying data, but it can provide context to help understand what those connections mean
3. Labeling should be a shared effort
We label as much as we can (1B+ labels), but we can’t reverse-engineer every custom mechanism across every chain.
Projects know their infra better than anyone: contracts, treasuries, fees, reward systems, etc. And they shouldn’t want us guessing. That’s why anyone can submit labels directly through Bubblemaps:
https://t.co/YSixYQIsOO
***
Thanks for reading!
We’ve updated the map of $EMBER
Team members reached out with more context on a wallet that created a cluster:
Wallet GZjYfG is a reward distributor
It's now labeled and hidden
***
This context wasn’t available onchain
Ember’s flywheel mechanism is not standard
Rewards are sent from a regular EOA controlled offchain, rather than through a contract that can be identified automatically. From an onchain perspective, GZjYfG looks like a wallet sending tokens to other holders.
The connections were correct.
The missing piece was Ember’s offchain setup
***
This highlights a few misconceptions about Bubblemaps:
1. A cluster does NOT mean a scam
Clusters show connections between holders, which can (sometimes) have legitimate explanations. The issue is obfuscation, not concentration.
2. Label is context
Bubblemaps shows onchain connections. A missing label never change the underlying data, but it can provide context to help understand what those connections mean
3. Labeling should be a shared effort
We label as much as we can (1B+ labels), but we can’t reverse-engineer every custom mechanism across every chain.
Projects know their infra better than anyone: contracts, treasuries, fees, reward systems, etc. And they shouldn’t want us guessing. That’s why anyone can submit labels directly through Bubblemaps:
https://t.co/YSixYQIsOO
***
Thanks for reading!
We’ve updated the map of $EMBER
Team members reached out with more context on a wallet that created a cluster:
Wallet GZjYfG is a reward distributor
It's now labeled and hidden
***
This context wasn’t available onchain
Ember’s flywheel mechanism is not standard
Rewards are sent from a regular EOA controlled offchain, rather than through a contract that can be identified automatically. From an onchain perspective, GZjYfG looks like a wallet sending tokens to other holders.
The connections were correct.
The missing piece was Ember’s offchain setup
***
This highlights a few misconceptions about Bubblemaps:
1. A cluster does NOT mean a scam
Clusters show connections between holders, which can (sometimes) have legitimate explanations. The issue is obfuscation, not concentration.
2. Label is context
Bubblemaps shows onchain connections. A missing label never change the underlying data, but it can provide context to help understand what those connections mean
3. Labeling should be a shared effort
We label as much as we can (1B+ labels), but we can’t reverse-engineer every custom mechanism across every chain.
Projects know their infra better than anyone: contracts, treasuries, fees, reward systems, etc. And they shouldn’t want us guessing. That’s why anyone can submit labels directly through Bubblemaps:
https://t.co/YSixYQIsOO
***
Thanks for reading!