@codydyer@DapperDomo @1broadwaybu Philosophy, because it teaches you critical thinking at a higher/more efficient level than the others and thus you could use those skills to learn anything about politics and learn how to solve whatever problem at a more efficient rate and talk about it coherently.
@slpydream Please give us the evidence you have that demonstrates that him buying the account is more likely true than him handleveling the account. If not, then you should probably not say anything about something you don't know. Assuming is a bad thing to do.
@lilylutt Please help me understand something. Is creating a new account and leveling it up fast to rank up and going undefeated in ranked smurfing? If so, then you're saying no challenger player could ever make a new account then, right? Or what else could they do?
@MrFanatiq@Ruben4morim @cluumssyy @przemek_draco@AlaskanTom Apparently LSAT = IQ and 3 ppl agree. And obviously the first pic is like some automated fun IQ test online. The worst “This you?” Of all time 💔
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna No no no. Talk about it in a convincing manner to try to explain how philosophy is at the height of consideration of what field would have smart students and explain why that’s so to her so that she would be convinced.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna Okay so if you had a message to the original poster of this thread, what would you say to her after how much we’ve discussed and explain your reasoning to her so that anyone can understand including her and any onlookers.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna Well you don’t know that philosophy has higher peaks than physics since physics is a hyperspecific field STEM and there are very technical fields in philosophy too like formal logic and philosophy of math/science/probability theory.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna Brother, dishonesty comes in many shapes. Shifting the subject when no one was even speaking on that isn’t having a good faith discussion with the topic at hand. At the very best you were not being linear which violates basic dialect norms.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna No it’s dishonest when you change the topic from STEM majors vs Philsophy majors to ONLY physics majors vs philosophy majors.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna But notice how broad “philosophy” is vs how hyper specific “theoretical physics” is. Philosophy would be analogous to STEM or just Science in this instance. Philosophy of Science would be analogous to Theoretical Physics. Philosophy math too, maybe. Looks like ur dishonest.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna What’s the argument for that? And by argument, I️ mean it in the standard philosophical sense. Also you never answered when I️ asked you how you would define smart.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna OBVIOUSLY combining fields with philosophy is better than just philosophy alone. We’re having a discussion like the GOAT in basketball except now it’s what’s the GOAT field in academia for the title of most likely field to have a smart person or field with smartest avg student
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna I️ literally asked you what smart means. I’m not forcing anything in actuality. This is just a fun hypothetical. And an interesting question, the idea of intelligence for me is the ability to learn quickly and adapt. I️ don’t see a field more equipped for that than philosophy.
@grok@amazingpicsa@ppyowna I’m not sure that you’re getting it. If we had to choose. Which of those 3 categories would be at the top for most likely to be smart? Maybe smart isn’t being defined well because idk what application even means. You can be smart without applying it to anything.