Marianne hat Platz

Michael holt gerade Brötchen.

[Henry VIII @SussexHenryVIII]

The contrast can’t be more clear.

Turns out you don’t need to parade your kids around in a golden carriage to perform service.

[Nova🌼♎️🦋🪷 @ThatFamilyBS]

Well, there's absolutely nothing PW can do that will make any difference in the life that Harry and Meghan are living in Montecito right now or here after.
Billy is going to stay fuming, huffing and puffing his usual MO, till kingdom comes.💅

[K D 💙🌼🌻🪷🌹 @karend0609]

1. Louis Mountbatten. Kincora boys home.
2. Margaret. Bedhopping, chain smoking, heavy drinker. Adultery.
3. Charles. Adulterer and tampon King.
4. Camilla. A cheating sidepiece.
5. Andrew. Sex pervert.
6. Phillip. Racist womaniser.
7.Anne. Adultery

And there's more!

But....

[Kima 💜 @KIMA0330]

So let me see if I understand, if you're not a "working royal" you can have security, a house owned by the Crown, use your HRH title, do charity work, and do whatever you want to earn money, UNLESS you're Harry and Meghan 🤔Got it? I wonder what the non-racist reason for this is

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

This 👇🏼

[Quinn @Mikeedakid1]

Correcting the Record — Royal Edition

The Royal Family’s Real Estate Problem Is Apparently Less Interesting Than Harry’s Mortgage

For years we’ve been told that Prince Harry’s finances are somehow a matter of national importance.

His mortgage.

His Netflix deal.

His book deal.

His speaking engagements.

His security costs.

His business ventures.

If Harry buys a house, it’s news.

If Harry refinances a house, it’s news.

If Harry sneezes near a bank, somebody in the British press is probably writing a story about it.

We’ve watched years of headlines dissecting every dollar the Duke of Sussex earns, spends, borrows, saves, or invests.

And yet somehow, when questions arise about royal housing arrangements, peppercorn rents, royal property deals, and who benefits from them, the volume suddenly gets turned way down.

Funny how that works.

Recent reporting has raised fresh questions about Prince Andrew’s ability to generate income from subletting cottages connected to Royal Lodge while benefiting from a peppercorn-rent arrangement.

Now let’s be clear.

This isn’t about claiming wrongdoing where none has been proven.

It’s about asking why certain financial stories receive relentless scrutiny while others seem to receive a fraction of the attention.

Because if we’re going to talk about money, let’s talk about all of it.

If we’re going to talk about accountability, let’s apply it equally.

If we’re going to ask questions, let’s ask them of everyone.

What makes this so absurd is that Harry no longer receives funding from the Sovereign Grant.

He doesn’t receive public money to support his lifestyle.

He lives in California.

He earns his own income.

He pays his own bills.

Yet somehow his mortgage has become one of the British media’s favorite long-running soap operas.

Meanwhile, stories involving royal estates, royal properties, royal housing privileges, and long-standing financial arrangements often seem to generate significantly less outrage.

Why?

Why is a private citizen’s mortgage more interesting than questions involving royal property arrangements?

Why is Harry’s bank account endlessly fascinating while other financial questions are treated like awkward family business nobody wants to discuss?

The answer might make some people uncomfortable.

Because for years, Harry and Meghan Sussex have been the industry’s most reliable source of clicks, outrage, engagement, television segments, YouTube videos, and newspaper traffic.

Their finances get examined under a microscope.

Everyone else’s finances often get treated with a magnifying glass left in the drawer.

That’s not balance.

That’s not consistency.

And it sure as hell isn’t equal scrutiny.

If the media wants to investigate royal money, investigate royal money.

All of it.

Not just the parts involving the couple you’ve built an entire cottage industry around attacking.

Because from where I’m sitting, the question was never really Harry’s mortgage.

The question is why some people keep counting Harry’s pockets while looking the other way when the spotlight lands a little closer to the palace gates.

Funny as hell how that works.

[🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 @King0243_PJC]

The monarchy’s desperate new poll on Harry and Meghan’s popularity, 6 years after they walked away, exposes raw institutional panic.

Nothing screams collapsing relevance like fixating on the couple who escaped your toxic circus.

Kate Middleton, after 20 years as a professional mannequin: nothing but a recycled wardrobe, zero credible achievements, and a legacy so empty it needs Harry and Meghan as props to stay visible.

Reduced to compare and cope PR stunts.

If the Windsors must drag exiles to manufacture relevance, they are not majestic, merely mediocre and fading.

Harry and Meghan exposed the hollow void you paper over with pageantry. Keep polling ghosts. Absolute nonsenses. Next #HarryAndMeghan #KateMiddleton

[SK 💃🏾🕺 @Rimmesfk]

If you want to see the full power that The Royal family has over British Media see how they made Andrew’s new sexual assault allegations into a non story, no media house is touching it or discussing it.. but they will discuss Jam from dusk till Dawn with round the clock articles😏

Well done Australia for trying to report the news!

[btn2045 @btn2045131826]

@UnJourSansMoi All three of those women are sad, social climbing commoners, who are seething with jealousy. They had to hustle and maneuver for years to get their princes to commit to them. Meg just showed up and was beloved. They can't stand it.

[Richmond Girl @BKBBarnes]

@King0243_PJC The thing is why are acounts like these allowed to continue? When you can see it's just hate, hate, hate it's not freedom of speech it's abuse. How is it healthy to have this on any platform?

[MontecitoGirl @montecito_girl]

@ZandiSussex @JConabicycle For normal ppl it’s absolutely insane rota RF puff writers would fly to Switzerland to listen to someone they claim is irrelevant & hated, but didn’t fly to Italy to cover so-called future queen���. They can say whatever they want but their actions shows Meghan is the real deal!

[Quinn @Mikeedakid1]

The UK Press Wants Harry & Meghan Broke So Badly

The British media’s obsession with wanting Prince Harry and Meghan Sussex broke needs to be studied because who the fuck spends this much time counting another grown couple’s pockets?
Every other week it’s:
“They’re running out of money.”
“Harry’s inheritance is drying up.”
“They can’t afford security.”
“Netflix is done.”
“They’re desperate.”
Bullshit.
And honestly?
It feels more like deflection than journalism.
Because right as stories start popping up about royal finances, suddenly the UK press runs back to their favorite distraction:
Harry and Meghan’s bank account.
Now we’re getting stories about how much tax the Prince of Wales paid, even though he’s not technically required to pay income tax on Duchy profits.
Convenient timing, isn’t it?
Meanwhile, the actual financial structures tied to the monarchy barely get scrutinized with the same energy.
The Duchy of Cornwall.
The Duchy of Lancaster.
Public funding.
Private estates.
Royal wealth structures most people still don’t fully understand.
But somehow the “urgent” story is always two people who no longer receive public funding.
That’s the part that kills me.
Harry and Meghan left.
They are not working royals.
They are not funded by the Sovereign Grant.
Yet their finances get dissected more aggressively than the people still operating inside the institution itself.
Why?
Because “Harry and Meghan are broke” is sexier clickbait than asking uncomfortable questions about royal money.
And speaking of finances…
Did the public ever get full transparency on who participated in funding Prince Andrew’s settlement?
Did we ever get a complete breakdown there?
Or are we only supposed to obsess over Harry’s inheritance while pretending other financial questions don’t exist?
The UK media keeps screaming that Harry and Meghan are “irrelevant” while building entire business models around them.
At some point, y’all gotta pick a struggle.

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

@Daily_Express Amazing how ppl who spent decades inside the royal bubble still reduce an entire life to whether someone stayed useful to the institution. “Achieved nothing” is a bold claim for someone who built a global foundation, wrote a bestselling memoir, and still dominates headlines 24/7.

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

@ApolloOctavia @enews Except they’re not conducting state visits. That’s the entire point. They don’t represent the UK government, don’t negotiate policy, and don’t travel on behalf of the Crown. Visiting charities and speaking publicly isn’t the same thing as being working royals. 👋🏻

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

@people I thought the Palace had an entire HR department, staff offices, and endless resources to help the Princess of Wales find childcare. Do tell us more about how uniquely difficult that was. 🥴

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

@susi_spencer @enews Muhahaha, apparently there was still enough enthusiasm left for Copykate to copy beige-on-beige after all.

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

@blumfie5526 @chrisshipitv And what is ‘Austrailia’? So many questions…

[Marianne hat Platz @HatPlatz]

@pinkpigs657 @CameronDLWalker @Earlychildhood At least they should scream about her „beige mess“ since I’ve read about this a multiple times the last weeks, when Meghan showed up all beige tones in ’Austrailia‘…