two types of healthy partners: those who witnessed nurturing love between caregivers and experienced a supportive and peaceful life. and those who experienced the opposite - but break patterns by rejecting chaos and refusing to become the people who did not love them correctly
@MSARNAULT @Digital57050737 @wilywindymoors @TheoBro1646 @conservmillen And if everyone really does have a problem with someone else having an abortion, then why not start before conception can even happen! Have every man get a reversible vasectomy, and it can’t be reversed unless you have the signature and consent of whoever is getting pregnant!
@MSARNAULT @Digital57050737 @wilywindymoors @TheoBro1646 @conservmillen So, you agree! If the government “shall not interfere with the right of the people”, then you also think they should not have the ABILITY to TAKE OUR RIGHTS AWAY. I AGREE! They should NOT be trying to take the right to our bodies or medical care because of their OPINION.
@wilywindymoors @TheoBro1646 @MSARNAULT@conservmillen And I’m not saying TAKE THE GUNS FROM YOUR HANDS. I’m saying they can take away the RIGHT to purchase guns. Taking one freedom ends up leading to others being taken as well.
@wilywindymoors @TheoBro1646 @MSARNAULT@conservmillen Okay? That still does not STATE the WORD “guns”. It is ‘arms’. So the people are saying “the word abortion isn’t in the constitution so it’s not protected” okay, and? It doesn’t say guns either. So can they take those away also? That’s the point I’m trying to make.
@TheoBro1646 @MSARNAULT@conservmillen Actually, it says “right to bare arms”. So, the government can take your guns, and begin selling knives instead. They can say that you still have your ‘right.’ So, consider next time you think that just because something isn’t SPECIFICALLY in the Constitution, it’s not a right.