As long as there are people who claim to be Muslim and who claim to speak for Islam while negatively alluding to every instance of the implementation of the Shari'ah as "becoming Afghanistan," the greater fight is against such people.
Such people represent the enemy among us and they continue to distort Islam among Muslims while representing the agenda and interests of Kuffaar.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭😭 thanks for conceding you argument!
Your argument was you can conceive of a different limit, therefore contingent and could be otherwise because it’s logically possible to be otherwise.
But now, you have agreed that something can be logically possible but metaphysically impossible.
Since that is my doxastic commitment and you are doing an internal critique, you have admitted that there is no metaphysical incoherence in my position
YOU
JUST
LOST 😭😭🫵🏼🫵🏼🫵🏼
هذا النقش وحد بالقرب من الطائف في السعودية 🇸🇦 ويبدو انه نُقش في زمن معاوية بن ابي سفيان (رضي الله عنهم) عام 58 للهجري، مكتوباً عليه :
"هذا السد لعبد الله معاوية امير المؤمنين اللهم اغفر لعبد الله معاوية وثبته وانصره ومتع المؤمنين به"
لقد احزنني وضع الشيىعة واشفقت عليهم
الجميع همشهم حتى الائمة الذين يعبدونهم ويقدسونهم همشوهم وطيحوا حضهم
حتى جعفر بن محمد بن علي بن الحسين الذي قدسه الشعاشيع وجعلوا اسمهم على اسمه
يدعوا للتوحيد ويهدم عقيدة بني رفضون الجعفرية !!
منذ سنوات تمر عليه هذه النقوشات
ومن خلال هذه النقوشات
فهمت أمرا عظيما
أن الصحابة والتابعين كانوا حريصين جدا ان يوصلوا لنا هذه الر��الة العظيمة حتى ولو على الحجارة
ويبينوا لنا اهمية التوحيد
(ان فلان يشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له)
(ويسأل الله له المغفرة)
هذا هو هم الصحابة والتابعين!!!!
I wholeheartedly believe that the discovery of all these inscribed stone tablets is a divine doing of epic proportions.
It destroys decades of orientalist anti-Islamic slop.
It rejuvenates our certainty in the first principles of our faith, namely: the preservation of the Quran, the Ahlul Bayt having normal Sunni creed, etc.
In one sweeping discovery, innovative Islamic sects and Western orientalists were silenced.
All while elevating the spiritual yaqeen of the bulk majority of our ummah.
This sets the stage for our civilizational inflection point; our ascendancy is divinely ordained.
كُنتُمْ خَيْرَ أُمَّةٍ أُخْرِجَتْ لِلنَّاسِ تَأْمُرُونَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَتَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ وَتُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ
The recent discovery of an inscription stating that Allah is the Walī of ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb (r.a.) in this world and the Hereafter is remarkable. Not because of the statement itself—anyone who studies the Sīrah of ʿUmar (r.a.) with sincerity and without prejudice will inevitably arrive at that conclusion—but because it makes one wonder what prompted someone to inscribe those words in stone.
What blessing did he witness? What victory did he see unfold before his eyes? What act of courage, justice, sacrifice, or piety moved him so deeply that he felt compelled to immortalise his thoughts? People put pen to paper to express what resonates within them, and the people of that era often etched their thoughts into the rocks and mountains that lined their journeys. Such inscriptions were not written without reason.
This discovery also serves as a powerful reminder that history still has much to reveal. Just as this inscription emerged unexpectedly and confirmed what many already knew about the status of Umar (r.a.) there may yet be countless testimonies waiting to be uncovered regarding the virtues of the noble Companions (r.a.).
More importantly, it reminds us that on the Day of Judgement, the true rank and contribution of the ��aḥābah رضي الله عنهم in the propagation and preservation of Islam will be manifest for all to see. Many who sought to diminish their status will be confronted with realities they spent their lives denying.
We must ensure that we are on the right side of this matter if we hope to attain salvation on that tremendous Day.
May Allah grant us the companionship of these noble souls alongside our beloved Messenger ﷺ on that Tremendous Day. Āmīn.
@tanpukunokami The japanese people should abandon their wretched polytheistic practices and embrace the pure monotheism of Islam. It is utterly abhorrent what you do.
@ThisIsTheNaiad It's a response to their critique of other groups that don't hold to DCT and say that God can not do unbefitting acts. The Asharis argue that this undermines divine agency. Perfect knowledge does exactly that regardless.
This misuse of majaz creates a dangerous loophole that can be stretched to justify virtually any form of ghuluw and even outright shirk in practice. A person can raise his hands, directly invoke his preferred pir or imam for all his needs, at any time, in any place, in any language, even in a whisper, exactly in the way Muslims are supposed to invoke none but Allah alone; and then, afterwards, simply claim: ‘What is actually meant is that the saint asks Allah, not that the saint himself helps.’
Begging for dua from a saint WITHIN one’s dua, which IS ibadah and thus should be directed to none but Allah, is already asking the saint for help. Besides, how foolish is it to believe otherwise when one only needs to observe the thousands of existing clips from Najaf, Karbala, and other Quburi hotspots in the Indian subcontinent and in Egypt, such as the Badawi shrine, where Quburis, with UTMOST khushu and khudu, directly invoke their buried saint and clearly want the saint himself to help them. At times, they even openly confess to this, as the Rafidah mushrikun do on Iranian state TV, as can be seen in the clip I subtitled here.
The outward act (zahir) is indistinguishable from direct invocation, yet the entire act is retrospectively reinterpreted through majaz to avoid its implications. So the form is preserved, but the meaning is redefined after the fact. That is not a clarification; it is a satanic shirk-longing loophole used to trivialise the mother of shirk, namely PRAYING to saints (and it doesn't matter if they are dead or alive).
If such an approach is accepted, then the boundary of tawhid becomes non-operational in real terms. Any act, no matter how explicit in its outward resemblance to dua directed to other than Allah, can always be linguistically reframed: ‘He did not mean it literally; He only meant intercession. Ya Ali help actually means: Ya Ali, could you ask Allah to help me lift this heavy box.’ This effectively empties the prohibition of its substance.
By Allah, the issue is not merely semantic, it is epistemological and practical. If the outward form of an act can no longer be relied upon as an indicator of its nature, then how is shirk to be recognised at all? Revelation addressed people based on what they said and did openly, not on unverifiable internal reinterpretations that contradict the apparent act.
#Quburiology
If u told them krishna is also a creator of the universe "dependently as a wali, not as a hindu god" & therefore we can unite on calling upon krisna as well & go to UAE temples, they would stop calling u a "UAE hindu temple apologist" & start calling u an "Islamic ummah uniter".