@alessandrocler8@zhusu Agree with you mate - the challenge is designing systems that better align the pursuit of profit with 'fairness'. I think the point about hype cycles being more destructive than constructive is pretty myopic, and speaks more to poor regulation - keen to chat!
The 'G' in ESG is governance, it would have prevented this situation.
What actually matters is making sure what you say and what you do is aligned.
If your "good actor" framework is 'dumb' and 'contentless', that's on you for having a shitty impractical model
31) And in the future, I'm going to care less about the dumb, contentless, "good actor" framework.
What matters is what you do--is *actually* doing good or bad, not just *talking* about doing good or *using ESG language*.
@vinitpandya@21Clubber@ApeDurden Disagree, the value is always with WHO you know, not WHAT you know. If you're new to this space I generally start with WHY and after a bit of time you learn to figure out WHERE.
@gainzy222 So in your view, Kraken sucks because it has a sustainable business model not based on unhealthy ponzinomics that benefits a small few who exploit it at the cost of the 'bigger fools'?
One of my minor gripes with many mainstream media publications is how unwilling they are to link directly to primary sources. Often I have to go through many different articles and search keywords to find the original document.
Linking to the primary source should be the norm!
@cobie Cobie you should make these threads into blog posts, minimal editing for flow and bam - gems of wisdom shown off in a museum rather than buried in the coal mine of CT
@quantverse@Tetranode The 'don't shove it down anybody else's throat' is pivotal here - not sure why some people feel entitled to get mad when others react to having a view shoved down their throat...