I'm an AI services startup founder based in Sydney. I specialise in using AI to help businesses put technology into practice, working with small business owners
我们现在正处于一个关键节点,面临着平台式人工智能与私有式人工智能的抉择。
很多人将私有式 AI 简单等同于本地部署模型,但私有 AI Agent 的核心区别不在于部署位置,而在于数据的主权:数据是由平台方掌控,还是掌握在自己手中?将数据交给平台,利用其提供的搜索等功能固然可行,但不仅存在性能瓶颈,更重要的是,当 Agent 能力达到一定高度时,将敏感信息托付给外部服务商会带来巨大的安全风险。因此,让每个人拥有自己的 AI,并将数据保留在自己搭建的平台上,才是未来的方向。
过去搭建平台的门槛极高,需要专业团队开发;而现在,具备 AI 认知的创始人或业务负责人,完全有能力独立完成搭建。目前的痛点在于缺乏专业的使用知识,导致许多人仍需依赖技术背景更强的人来辅助构建。
长远来看,AI Agent 的形态会不断演变,但其核心逻辑始终离不开“私有化”与“定制化”这两个大前提。我们正在做的,就是通过自己的方式,大幅加快定制化的进程。
当然,这会触及许多商业利益的冲突。目前许多 AI 创业项目都试图获取用户数据,但这构成了一个悖论:市面上铺天盖地的平台宣传往往难以落地,而当用户真正拥有了个人 AI Agent 后,大众却对其能发挥的真实潜能缺乏认知。
理论上,如果老板投入足够的时间去研究,绝大多数电脑业务完全可以由 AI 代劳。现在的模型既能做快速决策,也能做深度决策,唯一欠缺的是对信息的理解力。我在实际落地中发现,真正的瓶颈不在于 AI 技术本身,而在于人处理信息的注意力带宽。一旦这个瓶颈被打破,或者我们找到了完全交给 AI 放手去做的方式,整个形势将彻底改变。
届时,关于这个领域的所有固有认知都将被重塑:许多项目将失去存在的意义,甚至许多人工岗位也会变得多余。这或许会引发另一种层面的意义危机。如果我们没有自己的品牌,没有完成足够的财富积累,也没有属于自己的影响力,那么未来的世界可能会非常残酷。这,或许是一个并不美好的未来。
AI 的普及正在潜移默化地加重人类的偏见。许多看似客观的技能与工作流,本质上其实是建立在特定偏见之上的,而 AI 强大的性能恰恰掩盖了这些偏见,使其变得更加难以察觉。随着这种趋势的演变,人类的社会结构可能会逐渐分化为以下三种令人悲观且扭曲的形态:
1. 飞升者(狂热的创新者): 这类人如同打了鸡血的疯子,沉迷于 AI 带来的无限可能,不断尝试各种新奇的实验与创造。他们试图通过 AI 突破人类的极限,但在这种极致的追求中,往往伴随着对现实的脱离。也正是这场灾难的罪魁祸首
2. 精神病(被社会排挤的“无用之人”): 随着 AI 实现生产流程的全面自动化,许多人的职业技能被彻底边缘化。当社会无法提供足够的价值认同,而心灵层面的慰藉又滞后于技术变革时,这些被时代抛弃的人极易陷入虚无,最终在心理失衡中走向精神崩溃。
3. 邪教徒(信息茧房的囚徒): 这类人沉溺于 AI 生成的各类产物,在算法构建的信息茧房中,他们的想法趋于高度一致,并以此作为信仰。AI 进一步强化了他们的偏见,使他们与外界的真实认知彻底隔绝。
长此以往,这三种人构成了未来社会的主要图景。无论哪一种,结局都显得十分可悲,最终似乎都难以逃脱偏见与异化的宿命。
@Watershed_games@ClaudeDevs Therefore, I hope the regulatory authorities can investigate this. This company has indeed been deceiving us consumers, and it is truly very non-transparent.
@Kisliy_K@AnthropicAI We, as users, are being treated completely unfairly. I had barely been using it for fifteen minutes before it stopped working. It's utterly ridiculous. Just fifteen minutes, and I'm on a 20x plan.
I reckon this is a major bug of theirs; I've seen plenty of other people run into the same issue. I was watching the progress bar closely, and it shoots straight from 20% or 30% up to 100% like a rocket.
Then, at the end, the weekly usage started off at 43% and slowly crept up to 48%, only to get stuck right there at 48%. What I mean is, that's the limit for Fable.
This is a critical issue that needs a direct fix. I am on a 20x plan, and I've seen many others in the developer community running into the exact same thing.
Since running the new 5.1 model, the current session fills up instantly. I was watching the progress bar closely because I had seen other people post about it beforehand: it jumps straight to full at 20 percent, so this clearly looks like a bug.
It is not just me, plenty of people in the developer community are affected. Even on a 20x plan, the current session gets maxed out immediately, rendering the tool unusable. I hope Claude can get this resolved as soon as possible. Thank you.
@ClaudeDevs I strongly suggest you sort this issue out as a matter of urgency. We, as users, are being treated completely unfairly.
I had barely been using it for fifteen minutes before it stopped working. It's utterly ridiculous. Just fifteen minutes, and I'm on a 20x plan.