The more I learn about cross-chain infra, the more I think key management is the most underrated risk
Everyone focuses on speed, better UX, and faster execution, but none of that matters if the keys controlling liquidity become the weakest link
@LitProtocol has an interesting approach here by making signing verifiable instead of relying on blind trust in hot wallets
I think that's a direction we'll see more protocols explore as cross-chain activity keeps growing, the protocols that win will be the ones users, builders, and institutions can actually trust
@LitProtocol is rolling out something new soon ๐-programmable money is about to get a lot more real. ๐ฅ
I really canโt wait to check it out! Check the sneak peek preview right in the post below.
@LitProtocol is rolling out something new soon ๐-programmable money is about to get a lot more real. ๐ฅ
I really canโt wait to check it out! Check the sneak peek preview right in the post below.
Something new is coming, powered by Lit.
Think Replit for money: build, test, and deploy automations that work across DeFi and CEXs all without handing control to a black-box custodian.
Programmable money is about to get a lot more real.
Reply with "yes" for early access!
Something new is coming, powered by Lit.
Think Replit for money: build, test, and deploy automations that work across DeFi and CEXs all without handing control to a black-box custodian.
Programmable money is about to get a lot more real.
Reply with "yes" for early access!
With Lit Protocol - your code runs in secure hardware that holds the keys and signs only when your rules pass across every chain and venue.
No one can extract the keys. Not even us.
With Lit Protocol - your code runs in secure hardware that holds the keys and signs only when your rules pass across every chain and venue.
No one can extract the keys. Not even us.