@brvtalamerican@postmanShmerg I've only seen it once but my absolute favourite was "Hitler wanted to deport the Jews to the middle east so that's why we should give infinitely aid to Israel
@OurOwnNation The most unhinged I've seen is a comment claiming its convenient Patrick was the only one "left unharmed" when he had to find his three children who were brutally murdered by the person he should have been able to trust most in the world
@exile_7S@IncredPapist_ ? You understand that the bible had human authors who wrote it right? And that they truly wrote it, that they weren't mere passive implements. Their will was conforrmed to God's will but it was still their will. They are the authors in your analogy not the pencil.
@mhael_fox@Womp_Tomp Saving the mother's life, which in most cases is also a major risk to the fetous and even in cases where it isn't the mother is generally the one whose life it is easier to protect. Is an unfortunate reality. But in the case of incest and rape, the child is completely
@Groyper_nigga@Halo3Groyper@109evictions@Reformaniac@nolibertarians You are you one who claimed Jesus was created in the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary. You are the one who argued that because his human nature and flesh was created that means "Jesus" was "created in Mary's womb by the holy spirit". Those are your words.
@Halo3Groyper@Groyper_nigga@109evictions@Reformaniac@nolibertarians ??? The distinction between the created nature and the uncreated person of Jesus was literally the entire point. "Jesus" is a divine person. The claim again was about "Jesus" being created, not about his human nature
@Groyper_nigga@109evictions@Reformaniac@nolibertarians because He is a (divine) person, not one of His natures. This is literally the same reasoning as to why Our Lady is the Theotokos. Jesus is the hypostatic union. You cannot say "Jesus was created" and mean "Jesus' human nature/ flesh was created" those are two different things
@Groyper_nigga@109evictions@Reformaniac@nolibertarians When you claimed "Jesus" was created in the womb of the Virgin Mary. You didn't say "His flesh", you didn't say "His nature" you said that Jesus was created, and as that screenshot says Jesus is the eternal uncreated second person of the trinity who took on a created human nature
@Groyper_nigga@109evictions@Reformaniac@nolibertarians "Same biological growth" how retarded can you be? No one was talking about the biological growth of Jesus' flesh !!!! the claim was "human that God created" Jesus is a divine eternal person of the trinity. He IS god.
@Groyper_nigga@109evictions@Reformaniac@nolibertarians Can you not see the difference between that screenshot and what you claimed? Jesus was not created, that's what you claimed. You claimed Jesus to be a "human that God created". He is a divine person whose FLESH and human nature was created