it doesn't need to be complicated.
Self-Scaling Capacity, Coercive Capacity, and Error Intolerance are the only 3 genetic vectors we need to complete the framework
rearrange the endpoints (dashed arrows [--]), and that is our state configuration at time == T
what we describe as personality can change over time under certain conditions;
incarceration is one such vector that can trigger collapse -> state reorganization
we all tell lies. it's just the function of the lie that changes based on state configuration;
high self-scaling capacity: e.g. lie to avoid shame exposure
high coercive capacity: e.g. lie to achieve desired environmental outcome
e.g. unanswered text
borderline: "Are they abandoning me?"
LOAD= relationship/self-coherence
shame/envy system: "Are they ignoring me bc I have lower standing?"
LOAD= comparative exposure
psychopathic: "Do I still need this person for the outcome?"
LOAD= constraint / execution
different psychological configurations do not necessarily differ in whether they experience anxiety;
they differ in what kinds of unresolved problems their nervous system treats as intolerable
today was dope. blessed to be alive
the manuscripts are all technically done, but i had more breakthrough insights.. i really dont want to start adding more to what is already written tho
i might just dump it here
in a debate between 2 non-pathological structures, avenues of wrongness admission are still accessible because reality can be influenced by facts which serve to "re-poll" a person's environment
this is not the case in narrative-locked structures, where facts are pre-determined
first 3 manuscripts of the framework are complete enough to be dropped open source. just need to finalize the diagrams.
it is partitioned into separate 5 books total plus 1 auxiliary work with selected case studies
they will be available on github
also my wrist is super sore but after 2 sessions of my red light machine it's already feeling better
ive spoken with medical professionals who dont believe in red light as a viable healing avenue, and i truly feel bad for them. their knowledge base is antiquated
was awesome scooping ice cream for the saratoga community for free ๐ฆ day yday. i dont work there anymore but its always great seeing familiar faces
the ecology framework ive developed wouldnt exist w/o my experience there๐
in systems architecture, it would be akin to a client/server relationship with regulatory load being represented in the form of UDP/TCP "packets";
UDP would represent regulation that is feedback-independent, and TCP would be feedback-dependent ;
i will probably formalize this
regulatory completion can be lensed through calmness;
in a dyadic system, we will see the pathological structure experiencing calmness/quiescence (the one being regulated), and the other structure experiencing NON-calmness (unease/anxiety/frustration manifestations etc);