helloPOLY

hi there! we're helloPOLY (formerly PolyFinda). a dating, events & community app for polyamory, ENM & kink. made in Melbourne. events back soon.

[Debbie Nease @DebbieN97142]

Let’s do a show and talk about why no one has ever suggested baseline testing PRIOR to all vaccines. I would
Love to see Joe Rogan take on and discuss what we actually have in place as vaccine safety measures via the CDC website. Hmmmm

Package inserts should let families know to request baseline testing such as urine tests or bloodwork PRIOR to your vaccine to form a baseline for reference if you do get an adverse reaction.

Type 1 diabetes immediately following vaccines. I am not alone and it has been in question for years.

Please bring awareness to Type 1 Diabetes immediately following vaccines.

My son tested 100% NEGATIVE for glucose & ketones minutes PRIOR to TDAP & Menactra. That night stomachache & next day asking us what a heart attack feels like. 14 days later throwing up, total of 43 days from shots 614 blood sugar (so he would have tested positive for glucose on his urine test& been a 309 blood sugar that day, but was 100% NEGATIVE of any glucose in his urine minutes PRIOR). After almost 4 years with NVICP special master denied our evidence and basically threatened any lawyer in the future to NOT bring a Type 1 diabetes case again. Hmmm wonder why? Don’t want to know? If they were so sure they would support testing done PRIOR. Because I am not alone. Why the rise in cases? Look at the steady incline and the predictions for 2030.

We need testing like my son had PRIOR. Urine tests & bloodwork need to be offered to families PRIOR to shots when they are handed their VIS form.

Doesn’t it seem odd that this common sense safety measure had been ignored?

Do they not want to know that these vaccines are causing Type 1 in children & adults? Urine tests & bloodwork PRIOR.

We need a senator to author Brayden’s Bill. Common sense is testing PRIOR to ALL vaccines. Bohannon vs. HHS @SenRonJohnson @RFKJr_Official @AaronSiriSG @WhiteHouse @NIHDirector_Jay

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

Grok: Yes, correct. If we take the map (the diagram shown in PolyFinda’s post) as an accurate representation of a real-life place on Earth, then a human could physically complete the task—crossing each of the seven bridges exactly once—by following the exact route PolyFinda described with the red https://t.co/C0r0CY6cn6’s why it works in that hypothetical real-world scenario:Real rivers (unlike the abstract puzzle diagram) always have a source/headwaters somewhere upstream. At that point the water becomes a trickle or disappears entirely, and the two banks meet as continuous dry land. You can simply walk from one bank to the other without needing (or using) any bridge.
The map shows the river channels extending off the edges (left side in the image), with uniform blue water right up to the frame. In real geography, those channels continue upstream beyond what’s drawn. Following one bank upstream (as the red arrows indicate), reaching the source, crossing on land, and returning downstream on the opposite bank gives you a free land connection between two landmasses that the puzzle treats as separated only by water.
That extra land crossing (not shown as a bridge on the map) is what makes an Eulerian path possible. You cross every one of the seven depicted bridges exactly once, end on the small island, and never repeat any.

This is exactly what PolyFinda outlined: start on the large island, follow the red path, go upstream on the mainland until it becomes dry land at the source, switch banks, head back downstream, and finish with the last bridge.A couple of important real-world caveats (even in this “accurate map” hypothetical):The diagram itself does not show the river narrowing to a trickle or dry land inside the map frame—the blue channels are the same width all the way to the edges. The source would be somewhere off-map upstream.
In the actual historic Königsberg location (the Pregel/Pregolya River), the source is roughly 123 km away, so it would be an extremely long walk. But physically, a human with time and the ability to trek along the banks could still do it.

PolyFinda’s solution is therefore “correct” under a literal real-world interpretation of the map. It’s a classic lateral-thinking workaround that exploits the fact that the puzzle is a simplified diagram, not the full infinite geography of a real river system. The mathematical puzzle (as Euler solved it) still says it’s impossible if you’re strictly limited to only the land and bridges shown. But your question asks about a human in a real place—and yes, they could.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@YellIntoTheWind @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans If you put me on the ground in this situation I can walk across all 7 bridges once without entering the water. This puzzle is solvable in a real life situation without cheating.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@joeroganhq Julian Assange

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@joeroganhq Steven Greer

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans It’s the river Sennarch in Königsberg.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans All rivers have a beginning which can be traversed. Is this factual or hypothetical?

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Which rule is broken?

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

Start on the large island and follow the red path. When back on the mainland walk upstream. The river will become a stream, the stream will become a trickle and eventually become dry land. Head back downstream on the opposite bank and then cross the last bridge to end your walk on the small island having crosses all bridges once.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@grok @frankfritz5 @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Grok is wrong twice now lol.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@mwmwmw86587312 @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans It is easily solvable without circumnavigation.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@grok @frankfritz5 @Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Grok is wrong… AGAIN!

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@Saddog369 @NoContextHumans Sorry but no, if you put me on the ground in this situation I can walk across all seven bridges once, without entering the water or jumping or cheating in any way.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@DanielS46581338 @ElonClipsX What does it destroy?

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

My feeble understanding is that the craft some how warp space/time in front of them and sort of continuously fall into the hole created, which gives an illusion of anti-gravity but it’s not actually anti-gravity.

If such an effect was created on the dark side of the Earth the orbit radius would increase over time.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

Correct!

But he also assumes the oceans would boil. I suspect it is technically feasible to increase the radius of the earths orbit, given what is currently being disclosed by whistleblowers and insiders about the propulsion mechanisms of ET craft.

Also another assumption is that humans currently only exist on Earth. That also may not be the case if ET craft are visiting earth or if humans have already secretly reverse engineered crashed craft, as also appears to be case, according to witness testimony.

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

@people_wee @ElonClipsX The sun is not massive enough to go super nova?

[helloPOLY @hellopolyapp]

https://t.co/SVARbsOHkU