BREAKING NEWS!
Investigators just uncovered another Fauci phone call.
He openly admits that once you destroy people’s livelihoods, their “ideological bullshit” falls away.
This is the man who helped shut down the country.
I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish (Professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London and one of the world's leading cancer immunologists) whether he believed the COVID vaccine was creating turbo cancers. He said yes, and that after reviewing over 400 publications on the subject the mechanisms are so numerous it's surprising there aren't more cases than we're already seeing.
He walked me through several of them. The vaccine suppresses T-cell response and switches the antibody system into a tolerant state, essentially converting the body into a condition similar to transplant readiness, where it won't reject a foreign organ and won't reject a cancer. It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. The Pfizer vaccine contains SV40, a known oncogene. It interferes with dozens of metabolic and signaling pathways that, when overstimulated, drive cancer and don't switch off.
The mechanism that concerns him most is the vaccine's ability to bind and silence tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA. If someone already carries a natural mutation in one of those genes, their cancer arrives 20 or 30 years earlier than it otherwise would have. Interfere with more than two or three of these pathways simultaneously and you pull it forward even further, and when the cancer does arrive, the brakes are gone.
In nearly 40 years he said he's never seen anything like the presentations he's seeing now.
He said we should ban all mRNA vaccines, because they aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies, and giving them to children can interfere with their genome for the rest of their lives. He called allowing these products to go into young people, when we knew none of them were at risk of dying, criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century.
Dr. James Thorp says the surge in severe birth defects and placental abnormalities after the COVID shots rolled out was unfathomable.
He personally saw the horrors in his own OB-GYN practice.
Dr. Thorp says one “well-known” hospital had EIGHT babies in the neonatal ICU suffering from the same rare, life-threatening birth defect at the same time.
He ran the numbers on this happening by chance, and the odds were 1 in 10 trillion.
THORP: "I saw a significant increase in fetal malformations of virtually every organ system."
"There literally were cystic hygromas (a fluid-filled sac in the head or neck), cardiac malformations, diaphragmatic hernias."
“Diaphragmatic hernias are very rare malformations. And I won’t mention which hospital, but there was a hospital that’s well known to me and to you. At one point in time, the neonatal intensive care unit had eight infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
"Now, you can run the numbers on that... but it’s one in several trillion—10 trillion."
"I saw severe placental abnormalities that I’ve documented and published."
“Severe growth restriction, blood clots in the mother and in the fetus. Seizure-like activity in the fetus, in mothers as well. There were multiple thrombotic events, both in the fetus and in the mother."
“Premature labor and delivery, premature death in the babies that were born. Increased risk of death."
"Substantial increase in babies that went... to the neonatal intensive care nursery."
ADDED CONTEXT: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life-threatening birth defect where a hole in the baby’s diaphragm allows abdominal organs to move into the chest, crowding the developing lungs and causing severe breathing problems.
It occurs in approximately 1 in 3,030 U.S. births and generally requires intensive neonatal care followed by surgery, per the CDC.
Dr. Thorp says one hospital had eight cases of this rare birth defect present at the same time.
“I don’t believe that even a 14-year-old can truly understand what the loss of their fertility is. At 14 I would have said that I didn’t want children but (motherhood) has been the most joyful, wonderful thing in my life.”
― JK Rowling
RFK Jr. explains why Fauci had such a problem with early treatments like ivermectin:
"Tony Fauci's problem is this: there's a little-known Federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.'”
“So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been ILLEGAL for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines, and they could have NEVER gotten them approved. And a 200 billion dollar enterprise would have collapsed."
Philippines Congress is now investigating over 290,000 excess deaths linked to the COVID vaccines.
They’re calling out the Department of Health for turning a blind eye to turbo cancers, myocarditis, and the injured.
One representative highlighted how children are now getting sick like 70 and 80 year olds.
How many more countries will have to do this before the world wakes up?
Amnesty is no longer the organisation that defended all who were persecuted for their freedom of speech. It has become a self-appointed, vainglorious policeman of wrongthink. It tweets out ideological slogans. It demonises those who disagree with those slogans. It intervened in FWS v Scottish Ministers, on the side of those determined to keep men in women’s prisons and rape crisis centres.
Some of us haven’t forgotten that Amnesty stopped supporting the since-murdered prisoner of conscience Alexei Navalny because they deemed he’d said unacceptable things in the past. They reversed that decision due to public backlash, exactly as they withdrew the recent defamatory report, before I or anyone else had responded to it, because they panicked on seeing the reaction. A cynic might think they changed their minds on both occasions, not on principle, but because they were afraid of losing money.
You cannot be simultaneously an impartial defender of freedom and speech and a wealthy international witch hunter that publicly vilifies and intimidates small campaigning groups with whom you disagree. As for ‘silencing’ Amnesty, I have neither the power nor the desire to do so. I want them to explain as loudly and extensively as possible why they are using their might and formerly lustrous reputation to attack small non-violent campaigning organisations with legally protected beliefs.