I’m not sure what course Pam Bondi is indicating here, if any. She says she’s going after people who engage in hate speech but then uses a fire bombing as an example. Obviously fire bombing someone’s house isn’t speech.
AG Pam Bondi pivots from question about Charlie Kirk's murder to complain about "antisemitism" and "hate speech" on college campuses.
"There's free speech and then there's hate speech…
"We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."
@intrnetdaughter Yeah he rambles quite a bit à la Alex Jones. Minute 14 is pretty much his thesis. Minute 15 has the Pam Bondi snippet where she hints at expanding hate speech laws.
@intrnetdaughter He called out Netanyahu and Bondi but stopped short of Trump. His free speech argument (against hate speech laws) was theological which I thought was odd.
https://t.co/3I2BtibOCl
As a data analyst, I can tell you this kind of marked change in trend is the result of a phenomenon known as “changing how you count something to get the result you want.”