@BenPres72778066@Arabbeau Oh yes—declare it “fact” based on disputed, unreliable reports and call it scholarship.
Those narratives aren’t authentic nor representative of Islam, no matter how often they’re repeated.
That’s not evidence—it’s recycled misinformation dressed up as certainty.
@BenPres72778066@Arabbeau Your question rests on a false premise.
Early marriage in that era is not what modern psychology calls “pedophilia.”
Projecting modern labels onto the past isn’t an argument—it’s a basic intellectual error.
@BenPres72778066@Arabbeau Your problem is that you know the truth, yet your hearts refuse to accept it. Seek the truth sincerely—there is no excuse for ignorance in our time.
@BenPres72778066@Arabbeau Your argument collapses on a basic historical error—judging the past by modern standards.
Such marriages were normal then and never condemned, even by his enemies.
“Pedophilia” is a modern label you’re misapplying.
This isn’t an argument—it’s ignorance dressed as criticism.
@BenPres72778066@Arabbeau “Oh really? While you’re busy attacking Islam, over 300 priests in Pennsylvania were busy abusing thousands of children. Maybe fix your own house before pointing fingers at others.”