ranarenee

[Sisa @TheTitanBaddie]

It's hilarious that there's a whole fanbase that wants this boy to be some tortured art and literature intellectual but he's really just a NYC wigga dude bro who loves bad bitches and coke.

[ariel @donotdelay]

Being raised in an anti SpongeBob household is a lifelong social handicap and lowkey abusive

[Ace Niederhoff LeFleur @aceniederhoff]

People in Huntington Beach still look like this

[ranarenee @hemareneee]

no dejes que ningún wey te robe tu swag princess, gatekeep that shiiiii!!!

[sui ☄️ @birdabo]

everybody calm down.

i got this.

[ranarenee @hemareneee]

estoica o estoy loca?

[damon 💬 @damonwishes]

how it feels to eat anything with added protein

[ranarenee @hemareneee]

Hold the cross high so I may see it through the flames_

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.

And it's making you a worse person because of it.

Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.

That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.

It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.

Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.

The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.

Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.

This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.

Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.

You're right. They're wrong.

Even when the opposite is true.

[Nature Unedited @NatureUnedited]

Mother bird protects it's egg

[daz @MetamateDaz]

“No one owes you anything”

YES THEY DO, AND I OWE THEM TOO I've had enough of this capitalist propaganda.

We're human, we live within society, we should be taking care of each other.

[horse dentist @equine__dentist]

>>>

[Yunie ૮ ․ ․ ྀིა @Hyeyunie]

We’re embarrassing ourselves for the pursuit of human connection later if you wanna join

[mosco, guapo y cachondo @MoscoEnkabronao]

algn sabe donde puedo conseguir tantita madre

[esteban @Estebanddo]

28 de febrero. Estados Unidos ha declarado otra guerra. Por la tarde fui al gimnasio

[Alvaro Berro @alvarofberro]

esto:

[x__x @bpdsins]

get weirder diva

[incognito tab #3 @notcrypticno]

the cartel kinda gay for caring about a man this much

[The Notorious J.O.V. @whotfisjovana]

Real