Henry Nash

Author (“Letters to Dead People”) and Entrepreneur. Believe in bringing back rational discussion and holding our politicians to account.

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@juneslater17 Err…. Maybe because it was in their manifesto, and they were elected by the people to government on that manifesto?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@floboflo Reading some of the replies…it appears that satire is in danger of extinction…..

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@RoryStewartUK @realDonaldTrump Just surprised this took so long to happen - there has always clearly been a mind-meld between you @POTUS

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@mrdavemacleod Oh, I did need a good laugh this morning….thanks for that….

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

Wow!

[Richard Woodruff 🇺🇦 @frontlinekit]

French senator perfectly describes the Trump situation.

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@Otto_English A number of my American friends say that a split into say DSA (Democratic States of America) and the rest may need to be seriously considered. West Coast + North East states combined would be an economic powerhouse.

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@RoryStewartUK Exactly. If the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, do we think the US would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@realannapaulina So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you think the US would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@jasonwhitlock So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you think the US would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@marion1_alice @GBNEWS @andytwelves So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you think the US would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@juneslater17 So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you think the US would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@RepStefanik @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@grahamallen So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@VivekGRamaswamy @realDonaldTrump So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@SecretaryBurgum @POTUS So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@DavidSacks So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@SecScottBessent So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@RepMarkGreen So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@bennyjohnson So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?

[Henry Nash @henrynash]

@PeteHegseth So if the scenario was that Russia took back Alaska (they owned it until 1867 after all), oh and maybe Seattle as well for good measure, killing 50,000+ Americans in the process, you would be OK with a “peace” deal that let them to keep the land?