@FOX13News This is a cluster of deaths involving one operator with improper practices. Sounds like a preventable incident that could involve any species. Why would it require a ban on the importation of around 100 sloths per year? Is it a crisis someone doesn't want to go to waste?
@SenatorSlotkin Don't be obtuse. Besides, all you did was confirm what we already know about all of you. Your problem now is that the mask can't be put back on after it slips off.
@Roper_Lab It isn't a vaccine. I don't care about your shoehorned redefinitions to what that means. We're not supposed to trust the gov in the 1st place and you keep showing us why. And stop pretending as if you reprobates have an ounce of credibility. You don't. We have all the receipts.
@hughhewitt@WSJ Predictions aren't more right just because they appeal to popularity and authority. You were there when all those economists ditched econ 101 and went along with Nixon's imbecilic wage and price controls, right? Economists either don't know or don't know they don't know.
@BostonGlobe Translation: Trump dismantled our kangaroo courts and is the reason why no one believes ALL women anymore. Without him, all those "false" accusations would still be true.
@KomaCampbellVA@Manservant_H@RapidResponse47 There's over 45 items on that list. Why is it so hard for you to name five. Do you think these infantile responses are helping your case?
@NBCNews So, are they saying men should only objectify women the way women objectify men? How would that work? Surely they're not saying women don't objectify men. That would be silly and just plain dumb, right? Right???
@britx94@MJTorres1230 Again, you're both wrong.
1. The 1st Amendment restricts the government. It doesn't apply to speech in the workplace.
2. There is no "hate speech" exception in the 1st Amendment. Think that one through and ask how that could be objectively and equally defined and applied.
@MJTorres1230@britx94 There is no "hate" speech exception in the 1st Amendment. See: Matal v Tam, Snyder v Phelps BUT, it only prevents the government from restricting speech. It doesn't cover speech in the context of employment
@monsieurphilipo@libsoftiktok@unccharlotte And what psychotic political bigots celebrate violence, threaten violence, incite violence, and actually are violent against anyone or anything their ignorant pea brains label an enemy in the society they hate.