corporations distill the worse in human beings. you might even have a collective of generally great people working there; but profit optimization and performance pressure will distill every little bit of decency that their employees are willing to compromise. faceless & ruthless.
I'm not sure the community will like this. @Hacker0x01 will now reuse your novel techniques / exploits / old reports to look for vulns on the rest of the customer's infra. I guess they will add you as collab and give you a bounty, right? right?!
My motivation to hack has really gone downhill. A huge part of it was cracking the puzzle of how a device works. Now it is an empty activity of managing some stupid probability machine. If I were someone purely motivated by money it would be great (I think), but I'm not...
Why are reports on H1 now handled by multiple triagers? Every message comes from a different triager; each one requesting more information. Really hard when you are trying to help with a PoC on hardware and you don't know what each triager's setup is like.
my experience with it so far is that it is far, far less likely to end up in false positives with that "trying to please" attitude of Opus. If it finds a dead end, it doesn't try to format it as a win. It abandons the path and switches to a new one (as it should)
We asked the CEO of HuggingFace @ClementDelangue what the risks of releasing powerful open source models are.
He says restricting AI creates more risk than openness.
"Six, seven years ago, at the time it was GPT-2, and there was already a lot of people saying that it was too dangerous to release in open source."
"Mythos, when it was announced was crazy dangerous... In a few weeks or a few months, everyone is gonna be using Mythos, and not destroy the world as a result."
"For cybersecurity, the biggest risk is that a few players have capabilities that other people don't have... If you make it more open, it's usually easier for defenders to react and make the whole system safer."
"The idea of restricting a technology like AI based on risks is like saying, 'Some people can punch other people, so let's tie down everybody's hands.'"
"Otherwise you slow down progress, you create massive gaps in terms of controls, in terms of capabilities, and you create actually additional risks."
Got tired of the security blocks with Opus so I started using Sonnet 4.6. Weirdly I think I'm getting better, more straightforward results without as much hallucinations and just baseless claims like I get with Opus 4.7