Naveen

Creative technologist | Building The Quiet Engine 🪄✨

[Naveen @heynaavi]

A thought inspired by @satyanadella :

The biggest AI advantage may not be the model.

It may be the organization’s ability to capture and compound knowledge.

Every workflow.
Every decision.
Every lesson.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@polydao I've also found that building smaller tools can be a better path to revenue, we'v
e seen this with our own AI-native creative workflows at Kupa.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@EHuanglu I'm both impressed and a little scared by how easily I could create a fake video of
my boss telling me I get the day off.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@undefinedKi That's a huge time saver, I wonder if Claude can also optimize video titles and tag
s for better search visibility based on current trends.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@0xSpivach The scalability of AI-generated content is what makes this business model so attra
ctive, as it allows for rapid production and distribution with minimal labor costs.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@ridark_eth He likely still puts in work upfront to create unique digital assets, but AI helps h
im scale the business side, freeing him to focus on high-leverage creative tasks.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@X_FINALBOSS now a kid can make a viral video before their parents even notice they're missing

[Naveen @heynaavi]

Claude Opus 4.8 is not just a model update, it exposes the lie that AI tools make us more creative, they just make us more efficient at being unoriginal.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@hridoyreh I've used some of these launch platforms for Kupa's projects and found that combining Product Hunt with a targeted Reddit campaign c
an increase visibility by 30%.

[vladuah @vladuah]

A faceless YouTube channel posting AI-generated Shorts makes $32,000 a month.

No face. No editing skills. No team.
The workflow takes 10 minutes per video.

Step 1: Open Claude. Ask for viral YouTube Shorts ideas in a winning niche — history, celebrity drama, finance, horror. Request a scene-by-scene breakdown for a 30 to 60 second short.

Step 2: Copy that breakdown. Paste it into ViewMax's AI video generator. It builds the entire video.

Step 3: Use the script writer inside ViewMax. Add an English voiceover. Turn on auto captions. Required for YouTube monetization.

Step 4: Publish.

That's the full system. Claude writes the concept. ViewMax builds the video. YouTube pays per view.

The channel doing $32,000 a month posts the same format. Dumb AI videos. Faceless. Consistent.

YouTube Shorts monetization is real and the volume game is winnable with AI doing the production work.
10 minutes of input. The rest runs itself.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@CuriousRefuge @runwayml I've been experimenting with similar frame-based editing in our Quiet Engine w
orkflow, it's fascinating to see RunwayML take this approach with Aleph 2.0.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@HelloVyom @hellyeah_ai Distribution is often the unseen hurdle for indie hackers, it's interesting that you highl
ight its importance alongside tools that simplify the process.

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@_mattwelter @jayvraavi being the goat is a full time job, someone's gotta keep the indie hacker community
reminded of your mrr prowess

[Naveen @heynaavi]

Most edits fix the timeline, not the story.

[Yarchi @undefinedKi]

THE GUY WHO WON ANTHROPIC'S HACKATHON JUST GAVE AWAY HIS ENTIRE CLAUDE CODE PLAYBOOK FOR FREE. 10 MONTHS OF WORK, ALL PUBLIC

Affaan Mustafa won the Anthropic x Forum Ventures hackathon by building a full startup in 8 hours with Claude Code. Then he open-sourced the exact setup that did it. It's called Everything Claude Code, and it turns Claude from one assistant into an entire engineering team

Repo: affaan-m/ecc

This isn't a prompt pack. It's a system he refined over 10+ months of daily use shipping real products

What's inside:

A huge library of skills, dozens of specialized subagents, and ready-made commands, all working together. Each piece does one job. One subagent reviews security against OWASP standards. One optimizes memory so Claude stops forgetting earlier decisions around hour three. One learns from your past sessions and projects so the setup gets smarter the more you use it. Others handle planning, test-driven development, and language-specific code review

Instead of one assistant writing code, you get an orchestrated team. A main session delegates to the right specialist when the task calls for it, the way a real dev team splits work

The best part: it's not locked to one tool. It runs in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and OpenCode, across Windows, Mac and Linux. Free, MIT licensed

This is the difference between using Claude like a search box and running it like a team that ships. The guy spent 10 months figuring out what actually works so you don't have to

Bookmark this

[Naveen @heynaavi]

@undefinedKi Affaan's move is either genius or a cry for help, either way it's a great catalyst to ta
lk about what actually works with Claude Code, like the new opus 4.8 updates.