As Mazi ##NnamdiKanu goes to court today, Justice Omotosho should bear in mind that NMA had already carried out a medical investigation on Mazi #NnamdiKanu before the 26th September.
LEGAL OBJECTION AND PUBLIC ADVISORY
Re: The Purported “NMA Medical Report” Scheduled for Tender on October 8, 2025
Issued by IPOB Legal Advisory Directorate
For Immediate Public Circulation
1. The Core Issue
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) under the leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu wish to alert the Nigerian public and the international community that the prosecution intends to tender before the Federal High Court, Abuja, a purported medical report allegedly issued by the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) regarding the health status of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
That report, dated September 22, 2025, is invalid, inadmissible, and ethically compromised. It predates the judicial order that authorized an independent medical evaluation, was never released to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu as promised by the NMA, and was allegedly prepared at the behest of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF).
This conduct violates both judicial authority and medical ethics, and represents a disturbing collusion between the Court, the AGF, and the NMA to manipulate evidence and obstruct justice.
2. Legal Defect and Grounds of Objection
(a) Temporal Illegality
The NMA report was produced before Justice Omotosho’s directive for an independent medical examination. A document created before the existence of a lawful order cannot retrospectively satisfy that order. Abacha v. Fawehinmi (2000) 6 NWLR (Pt. 660) 228 and FRN v. Iweka (2013) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1374) 265 both hold that any act done outside the timing or scope of judicial authorization is void ab initio.
(b) Absence of Judicial Supervision
Under Section 46(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, any medical or forensic examination intended for evidentiary use must be conducted pursuant to and under the authority of a court order. No re-examination or court-supervised evaluation has taken place after the September 22 document. The chain of custody and authenticity of the report are thus broken beyond repair.
(c) Violation of the Evidence Act
By Section 83(3) of the Evidence Act, 2011, documents made in anticipation of litigation or without contemporaneous authorization are inadmissible. The purported NMA report, being a pre-emptive product of the DSS and AGF, is tainted and cannot lawfully be tendered in court.
3. Concealment and Breach of Ethics
To worsen matters, even this dubious report has never been given to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu or his lawyers. On September 23, 2025, the Vice-President of the NMA personally assured Kanu and his family that the report would be handed to him that evening. Yet, as of today — October 7, 2025 — no such report has been delivered.
This concealment is a gross violation of Section 23(1) of the Medical and Dental Practitioners Act, which binds every doctor to transparency and patient disclosure. To prepare a medical report at the request of a party to litigation (the AGF), then withhold it from the patient while plotting to tender it in court, is a breach of both law and conscience.
The NMA, by allowing itself to act as an extension of the AGF’s office, has surrendered its independence and sullied the professional honour of Nigerian medicine.
4. Complicity of the Court
If the Court proceeds to entertain or admit this unreleased, pre-dated report, it will become an accomplice in executive deception. No defendant can lawfully be required to defend himself against a document he has neither seen nor been served.
Such a process violates the foundational principle of audi alteram partem — that no person should be condemned unheard — and breaches Section 36(6)(b) and (d) of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantee adequate facilities for defence and the right to confront one’s accusers.
...read the rest in the comment section
This and more others are some of Simon Ekpa's violent activities that the Finnish government is investigating.
Ekpa is reminded in Prison in Finland on a terrorism charges. His case will be determined in May 2025 by the Finnish Authority.
@VoteZephyrTair Voting for someone who is human and wanting the best for their COMMUNITY and not what's in it for themselves is definitely the way to go
@Olubankoleidowu How on earth can they do this, pure madness this man is definitely still a big concern to the government and Nigerian courts are as corrupted as it government