You clearly didn't read to understand , you read to reply cos you have an audience to feed and that is okay. But hear me out
My initial post I said "WE HAVE OUR FLAWS BUT THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN AN UPGRADE OF THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION"
And you said in your own words “I don't like how every new government is measured against the government that came immediately before it"
I replied with a question which you haven’t answered "Which country in this world doesn't compare its current government to the one that came before it?”
I doubled down with my point
"The previous NPP government is not EVEN THE BAR FOR JUDGING GOOD GOVERNANCE. Conversations like these need to be have constantly to remind people of where we were us a country, where we are now and where we want to be"
You reply with “I think we're mixing up comparison with standards.
We should compare a government to what it inherited. That tells us whether things improved.
What I'm saying is improvement alone is not success.”
Once again Nana B, you can’t compare governments with what they inherited without roping in the previous government. It is never heard of. Comparisons are one of the most practical ways to establish and test standards. To determine whether performance has improved or deteriorated, you usually need something to compare it against: the previous government, the previous year or the target that was set.
Let's stop going in circles it’s tiring