Kari Hillman

Redheaded Montana girl with a smart ass and a hankering for freedom.

[Prisha Mosley🦎 @PrishaMosley]

The person who was hurt the second most by my transition was my mother. She might not have physical scars, but I think they took pieces of her away when they medicalized me.

I feel so guilty for every time she was told to pretend that I wasn't her daughter, everytime she was gaslight for her grief. I will never forget the way she took care of me after my breasts were removed.

I was in pain and afraid in a hotel room, and she was there for me, showering me and cleaning me off, helping me when I couldn't lift my arms and do it myself. I know that must have nearly destroyed her. I wanted to be destroyed.

This ideology rips apart families. I wish I could go back and know what I know now.

[Kari Hillman @Hillman406]

You're dumb....we watch it twice every Thanksgiving.

[Miles Commodore @miles_commodore]

I went 30 plus years without ever seeing this movie. I have now watched it four times just this year.

[hoe_math = PsychoMath @ItIsHoeMath]

This is one of the smartest things I've read in a while. It is written the opposite of the way that I write.

I would say:

Most women in law are not able to understand the basics of justice.

Women, even women who are lawyers and judges, usually struggle with the difference between justice and nurture.

Men in law look at two opposing parties and judge the cases they present according to the rules of procedure.

Women in law look at two opposing parties and feel pity for the one they think is at a disadvantage (needs nurture). This makes them feel invested in a good outcome for the weaker party, or the "baby." (DESERVER)

Women also usually fail to see justice as a hostile contest between opposing points of view.

"We are not two separate parties; we are one big family, and we should all want everyone to be happy and safe! :)"

If a woman in law cannot transcend these family instincts, she violates the basic principle of "nemo iudex," meaning that no one should judge a case if they desire a specific outcome in that case. Instead of seeking justice, they will seek personal satisfaction (my baby won!).

She also violates "audi altereram partem," meaning that no one should be judged by someone who refuses to listen to their story (we've heard enough from PRIVILEGED WHITE MEN!).

You may recognize the absence of these principles in what we have been calling "cancel culture."

"Believe all women!" Remember that one?

That means "I want the woman to win" (DESERVER) and "don't listen to the man," all packed up into three neat little words!

Now, replace "woman" with "the party I feel bad for," and "man" with "the party I don't care about."

"I want the [DESERVER] to win! Don't listen to the [PRIVILEGE]!"

It should now be much more clear why the law has become increasingly lenient on criminals in recent years.

This is what I call "kindergarten mommy" consciousness, and it is severely corrosive to criminal justice. The courtroom is not a kindergarten or a family, it is a substitute for violent conflict between parties that absolutely do not consider each other family.

In other words, most women in law end up treating criminal justice proceedings like a fight between their own children.

[QThestorm @17QStorm]

ASSANGE CONFIRMED: Hillary’s Podesta Email PROVES Obama, Clinton, Saudi Arabia & Qatar Built ISIS!

Julian Assange called this one of the most significant emails in the entire Clinton collection.

Hillary’s message to John Podesta detailed how the Obama administration approved more than $80 billion in arms sales to Saudi Arabia — the largest deals of their kind — while total U.S. arms exports doubled during her time as Secretary of State.

Those same Saudi and Qatari governments were the primary funders of ISIS.

The outcome was a terror group that spread violence and instability across the region on a major scale.

The record continues to clarify what took place. Every verified detail helps separate fact from the official story.

Watch the video for the complete context, then share it so more people see the evidence for themselves.

Follow me for more intel drops!

[Gina Milan @ginamilan_]

Incredible. Mitch McConnell looks 20 years younger and is practically glowing.

Dude must really love that shirt.

I swear I’m living in The Truman Show at this point, because there is no way this picture is real. 🫠

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Every person living in a western nation needs to listen to every word of this

Katherine Berbalsingh went to the University of Oxford and is Headmaster at Michaela Community School in London, UK

She PERFECTLY explains the mass indoctrination into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, and of hating White People

I will write only some of this out because it’s very important, however you should listen to it so you can hear the passion:

“The culture shift comes from what children learn at school and online. Ask any young person what history they learned at school, and they’ll tell you, Hitler. Ask them what else? Slavery. Ask them what else? American civil rights.

In fact, what little they know of history will be all about Black and brown people fighting for equality against the white man, women fighting men for the vote, gay and trans people fighting for various rights. Our young people have been taught that history is simply one long story about various groups struggling under the oppressive dead white man.

— History is taught through an oppressor lens. The triangular slave trade, white men held the power. What about Britain ending the slave trade? More than a quick mention, if at all? Mm, no.

What of the Arab slave trade that lasted 3 times as long as the triangular slave trade? Mm, no.

Okay, so GCSE history in Britain is often taught as migration through time, so the idea that Britain has always been a land of immigrants is embedded in our children’s heads. Most schools would prefer to concentrate learning about the tiny number of Black people who existed in Tudor England over a thorough analysis of England’s break from Rome.

— Not to mention weeks on King Mansa Musa of Mali because he was a Black Muslim. His bearing on British institutions, laws, and faith is nonexistent. And the fact that he is said to have been the richest man in history, thanks in part to his massive slave-owning society, is a detail somehow that teachers rarely ever teach.

But it isn’t just our schools. It’s our general culture too. Take your kids to a museum or an art gallery in any Western country, and you’ll find the same narrative.

As an example, when learning about aviation in London’s Science Museum and the extraordinary feat that is man making massive machines move in the sky, a write-up on the wall explains that women and Black people were historically barred from aviation schools and the military. Similarly, James Watt, the man who invented the steam engine and is considered the founder of the Industrial Revolution, has a write-up on the wall explaining that his early career involved slave trafficking, with a bonus analysis of the whole of Britain’s complicity in the slave trade.

They flatten the entire human story and all of its complexities into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, leaving young people unable to see the world in any other terms.”

We have to end the mass indoctrination

[Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald]

I could not agree more with @marklevinshow that we can learn a lot from listening to Barry Goldwater.

Listen to Goldwater here describe the dominance of Israel over the US Congress (Goldwater's father was Jewish and spent his whole life in DC).

[🇺🇸 Pecan 🇺🇸 @PecanC8]

And then I saw the bun. 😂

Well played, QT! 👏👏

[Kari Hillman @Hillman406]

Bigger

[Department Of Deportations @DoDeportations]

We're just going to have to go even bigger. The Patels and Singhs are mad that we're exposing the lies.

[DG🎭 @DanielGilr44222]

"America is a golden calf, & we'll suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world's biggest welfare state that we'll create and control. This is what we do to countries that we hate.
We destroy them very slowly."

-Netanyahu 1990

[Mark Mitchell, Honest Pollster @honestpollster]

Call me old fashioned, but when I hear the word Capitalism, I think of things like:
> Small businesses
> Single doctor practices
> Manufacturing workers
> Sole inventors
> Community and value consciousness

Not: private equity, ballots, fed money, securitization, foreign hordes, HR Karens and soulless slop.

[Big Tex Harrison @Tharrison1840]

For men married to Italian, Balkan, and Hispanic women

[Z @insatiablevine]

The United States is fractured. A group of blue states now operates as if they are completely independent, openly defying federal law and the Constitution.
They ignore immigration enforcement, refuse to cooperate with the DOJ on voter rolls, block ICE from deporting criminal illegal immigrants, release criminals back into our communities through activist judges, issue fraudulent commercial driver’s licenses to illegal aliens, allow birth tourism in their hospitals, misuse federal tax dollars to indoctrinate children in public schools, and flout labor laws.
We can no longer ignore these rogue states and their lawless governors. Their actions harm every American.
We cannot remain the UNITED States of America if some states have effectively seceded in all but name.

[Kari Hillman @Hillman406]

@Crazymoments01 ❤️

[Soaring Eagle @zwinchester5]

Growing state Annual Wages for MT State employees.

[Kari Hillman @Hillman406]

Old man angrily yells at the sky and will call Canada! 😆

[🇺🇸JKCMO77🇺🇸 @TheIdealExit77]

Canada, we see your smoke signals and we can not help until you give up communism and being gay.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Eat a mouthful of grass and you get nothing. It goes in green and comes out green.

Eat straw and you get nothing. Your gut cannot touch cellulose.

Eat acorns and you get tannins, and a very bad afternoon.

Eat bracken and you get a carcinogen.

Eat nettles, thistles, brambles, rushes and moorland heather and you get a mouth full of blood and no calories.

Eat the beet pulp, the oat husks and the spent brewer's grain and you get the waste the factory couldn't sell.

Now feed the lot of it to a cow.

She turns every one of them into steak, butter, cream, milk and a hide, on land that will never grow a vegetable, using four stomachs and a fermentation vat you do not have.

The grass she eats grew on rain and sunlight, for free, on a hillside nobody can plough.

She is the only creature on earth that can take a field of inedible fibre and hand you back the most nutrient-dense food there is.

The cow is not competing with you for food. She eats the ninety percent you cannot.

Best plant-based diet ever invented. It just has a cow in the middle doing the hard part.

[Ken from KY-04 @MassieNation19]

Yeah it’s China

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

🏛️ Senator Mark Warner: Deep Dive

Mark Robert Warner (born December 15, 1954) — senior senator from Virginia since 2009, former governor (2002–2006), and one of the wealthiest members of Congress with an estimated net worth north of $215 million.

His path to power is a classic revolving-door story: tech entrepreneur → venture capitalist → governor → senator. He co-founded the wireless carrier Nextel and ran Columbia Capital, a venture capital firm. He didn’t just get rich — he got rich in telecommunications, a heavily regulated industry where his political connections and spectrum-trading savvy were the whole game.

💰 Donors & Financial Entanglements

Top Campaign Contributors (Historical)

From 2008 through 2014, his top-ten list reads like a who’s-who of Wall Street and the security state:

- JPMorgan Chase — one of the biggest banks in the world, deeply entangled in government bailouts and Fed liquidity

- The Blackstone Group — the private equity behemoth that profits from financialization and asset-stripping

- Columbia Capital — his own VC firm (self-funding as a permanent incumbent)

- BlackRock — interestingly, BlackRock contributions only started flowing after Warner personally bought shares in the BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund in 2011

That’s not a donor list. That’s a governing coalition of finance capital.

The most recent individual donor data shows an interesting pattern — a single donor, Katherine M. Buchanan, at $88,670, dwarfing all others. That’s not grassroots enthusiasm. That’s concentrated access-buying.

Wealth & Conflicts

Warner’s net worth makes him the wealthiest Democrat in Congress and the 7th wealthiest overall. He built that fortune trading cellular spectrum — a government-granted monopoly resource. His entire business career was arbitraging regulatory privilege, and now he writes the laws governing those same industries.

🕵️ The Surveillance State’s Best Friend

This is where Warner’s record goes from typical swamp creature to genuinely dangerous.

FISA Section 702

Warner is the Senate’s chief Democratic advocate for warrantless mass surveillance. As Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he’s been the lead negotiator pushing to reauthorize Section 702 of FISA — the program that lets intelligence agencies vacuum up Americans’ communications without warrants.

The pattern is well-established: Warner promises future privacy reforms to get reauthorization through, then those reforms never materialize. Civil liberties groups have repeatedly called this out. Sean Vitka of Demand Progress put it bluntly:

“Sen. Warner’s opposition to Bill Pulte masks the fact that he is still the Democrats’ chief advocate for handing over unchecked spying powers... By focusing on Pulte and not broader reforms, Sen. Warner is not standing up for Americans or the Constitution; he is disguising his work to engineer warrantless mass surveillance against us.”

He’s been caught in a telling contradiction. When Trump appointed unqualified loyalist Bill Pulte as acting DNI, Warner suddenly found his voice on “qualifications” — but only on personnel, never on the system itself. He explicitly said he’s “less worried” about Pulte when it comes to 702, and told Dana Bash on CNN that the real risk to national security is Trump’s appointment, not the warrantless surveillance itself.

The American Prospect captured the dynamic perfectly: “The leadership of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees are political captives of the intelligence community.” Warner isn’t overseeing the surveillance state — he’s its legislative bodyguard.

The Intelligence Committee Trap

Here’s the structural rot: Intelligence Committee leaders like Warner have effectively captured oversight of surveillance law, even though the Judiciary Committee has primary jurisdiction. The result is a committee full of members who get briefed on classified programs, develop institutional loyalty to the agencies, and then block meaningful reform — all while claiming they can’t discuss the details because they’re classified.

It’s a closed loop: secret briefings → claims of necessity → no public debate → reauthorization.

🔥 Recent Controversies

The Jay Jones Donation Scandal (2025)

Warner’s campaign donated $25,000 to Virginia AG candidate Jay Jones, and the two shared a joint fundraising page on ActBlue. Then it emerged that Jones had:

- Compared a Republican colleague to Hitler and Pol Pot

- Said if given “two bullets” he’d use both to shoot that colleague in the head

- Added that the colleague’s wife should have to watch his “fascist children” die

- Was separately accused of suggesting that if more police officers were killed, they’d shoot fewer people

Warner called the texts “appalling” but refused to call for Jones to drop out or return the money. His office didn’t even respond to press inquiries about it.

The NRSC hammered him: “Mark Warner has endorsed, donated to, and fundraised with Jay Jones, but won’t say whether he still supports him to be Virginia’s Attorney General after Jones called for the murder of a political opponent and his children.”

For a guy who constantly denounces “political violence,” the silence was deafening.

The Graham Platner Dodge (2026)

When Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner — a Democrat — faced allegations of emotional abuse, physical roughness, and volatile behavior from multiple ex-partners, Warner’s response was classic establishment evasion:

- Called the allegations “disturbing” if true
- Said he’s “never met” Platner, was that a lie?
- Punted entirely to voters: “American voters will make those decisions”
- Then, bizarrely, compared Platner’s situation to Trump’s Access Hollywood tape, essentially normalizing the behavior

Translation: when it’s a Democrat who might help flip a Senate seat, the standards evaporate. He couldn’t even bring himself to say Platner should drop out — just that Platner should “attempt to disprove” the allegations.

🏭 The Bigger Picture

Warner is a near-perfect specimen of the managerial elite that runs the national security and financial wings of the Democratic Party:

1. Wealth from regulated industry — built a fortune trading government-granted spectrum rights

2. Revolving-door governance — went from telecom VC to governor to senator with no friction

3. Wall Street funding — top donors are the biggest banks and private equity firms

4. Surveillance-state advocacy — the Senate’s most reliable Democrat for warrantless spying powers

5. Partisan double standards — denounces violence when convenient, goes silent when it’s his own side

6. AI hype-man — positioning himself as the Senate’s AI expert, which in practice means ensuring tech giants get to write the rules

He’s not a cartoon villain. He’s something more insidious: a competent, well-spoken, “bipartisan” operator who reliably delivers for the donor class and the intelligence community while maintaining a moderate-sounding public face. The bipartisanship is real — but it’s bipartisanship within the narrow band of elite consensus on surveillance, finance, and foreign policy.

The fact that the wealthiest Democrat in Congress is also the party’s lead negotiator on banking, finance, and intelligence legislation tells you everything you need to know about whose interests are actually being represented.