Whats actually important? People the ones who actually know you, not the ones you just collect.
Time that doesn’t feel wasted. Feeling alright in your own head. Being able to walk away from something and not fall apart.
The rest is just stuff we pile on top because it feels safer. Most of it isn’t.
ELON MUSK SAT SPEECHLESS AS JENSEN HUANG GAVE AWAY A CLAUDE PROMPT YOU CAN COPY TONIGHT
research used to eat jensen's whole weekend, 4-8 hours. now claude hands him the report in about 3 minutes.
his setup:
1. write out every question you have on the topic
2. ask it to compare the 2-3 approaches
3. ask for a report with charts, pie or bar
4. hit enter
the rest of the panel:
tom brown (anthropic): opus 5.5 holds longer tasks than any model before, so you can hand it bigger pieces of work
jensen on agents: give them only the access they need and keep watching what they do, like a new hire
elon: has heard of people sending x-rays and MRIs to AI after the doctor got it wrong
the parts worth watching:
13:53 - how jensen contains and monitors agents
19:32 - what opus 5.5 can take off your plate
21:05 - jensen's research routine
22:28 - elon on AI and medical scans
start tonight: pick one topic you keep putting off, write the questions, run the 4 steps.
save this and read the article below to make money with grok bot ↓
HOLY SH*T, JENSEN HUANG SAYS GROK BOT USAGE IS SKYROCKETING, AND ELON IS DOING SOMETHING ALMOST NOBODY ELSE DOES
JENSEN HUANG SAYS GROK BOT USAGE IS SKYROCKETING, AND ELON IS DOING SOMETHING ALMOST NOBODY ELSE DOES
nvidia's ceo, spent one minute on elon and grok bot.
what he said:
1. elon trains and runs his own models on nvidia chips
2. grok bot demand is climbing fast, jensen called it super cool
3. elon also rents that compute out to other companies
4. building it, running it and renting it: the only other one jensen names is google
5. his take on elon: nobody knows more about energy
start small: give grok bot one research task you keep putting off.
save this and read the article below to make money with grok bot ↓
BREAKING: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says he’s been betrayed by President Trump, claiming Trump and Elon Musk deliberately blocked Starlink in Ukraine overnight and that people were killed as a result.
Musk responded that Starshield, SpaceX’s military satellite network, is controlled by the U.S. government, with any limits decided by the military and “ultimately POTUS.”
Starlink, he said, is a commercial service that can’t be used for offensive military action.
BREAKING: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says he’s been betrayed by President Trump, claiming Trump and Elon Musk deliberately blocked Starlink in Ukraine overnight and that people were killed as a result.
Musk responded that Starshield, SpaceX’s military satellite network, is controlled by the U.S. government, with any limits decided by the military and “ultimately POTUS.”
Starlink, he said, is a commercial service that can’t be used for offensive military action.
ethereum:0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 has already delivered a 1x return since its first day of posting on X, and the project is gradually shifting from its early literary narrative based on Vitalik’s Snowmoon toward a privacy application narrative supported by a real product and external attention.
0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722
It is not Vitalik’s token, and Vitalik has not endorsed it. The project’s core idea is to turn the privacy payments and burn-to-send-message concepts of Zipcoin in Snowmoon into an actual product on Ethereum.
In terms of its product, ZC has already built several core features:
Zip / Unzip: Users deposit ZC into a Privacy Pool and then withdraw it to a new wallet using a zero-knowledge proof, reducing the direct link between the depositing and withdrawing addresses.
Burn to Speak: Users burn ZC to publish on-chain messages. The amount of ZC burned affects the message’s ranking.
Doorstep: Users send messages to ENS names or wallet addresses by burning ZC to get the recipient’s attention. They can also attach private transfers.
ZipTeller: Connects private funds with zkmoney and supports private fund operations for zkmoney accounts.
These features mean ZC is no longer just a Meme borrowing a literary concept. It is a literary narrative token backed by an actual product. However, having a working product does not mean its privacy capabilities are mature, nor does it mean the market has developed real demand.
The most important recent development is the emergence of external attention. zkmoney has publicly mentioned Zipcoin and discussed using Zipcoin to fund zkmoney accounts privately. Meanwhile, the team has expanded the fund flow to the 0xbow ETH Privacy Pool, attempting to use a larger ETH privacy pool and then convert the funds into private DAI on zkmoney.
This means ZC is extending from an independent privacy application toward an entry point that connects with existing privacy infrastructure. Compared with demonstrations published by the team itself, attention and integration initiated by external products carry greater validation value.
However, external mentions and actual adoption are two different things. Although the number of deposits in the Privacy Pool has increased from around 9 to around 19, and wallets outside the team have begun using Burn to Speak, the overall scale remains small. External transaction volume through ZipTeller is also insufficient to demonstrate stable demand.
In terms of token mechanics, ZC already has fee, buyback, and burn mechanisms. Trading fees can flow into the treasury to support buybacks, burns, and development. Operations such as Zip and Unzip also have their own fees.
The theoretical cycle is:Trading volume growth → More fees → Buybacks and burns → Reduced circulating supply.
However, growth in trading fees mainly reflects token trading activity. It does not directly prove that the product is attracting real users. Compared with buybacks funded by trading activity, user-initiated burns resulting from actual product use provide stronger evidence of product demand.
Previously, around 8.5% of the supply had been burned, while approximately 4% of the supply was held at the vitalik.eth address. Most of the large early burns came from the team and developers. The tokens sent to Vitalik’s address were also not purchased by him voluntarily.
Therefore, these figures reinforce the market narrative more than they demonstrate organic adoption.
The market narrative is changing. The first wave of price action mainly traded the connection between Snowmoon and Vitalik. Now, zkmoney’s public mention and product integration have provided ZC with a new signal of external validation.
If more privacy wallets, Ethereum developers, and applications actively integrate with ZC in the future, it could gradually evolve from a literary-concept Meme into a privacy ecosystem asset with practical use cases.
But if external attention does not translate into sustained product usage, the market may continue to rely primarily on narrative premiums.
After rebounding from a market cap of around $5M to the previous high range of approximately $18M–$20M, ZC has already completed a significant first revaluation. At this stage, it is not enough to focus only on a price breakout. Product usage data must also be considered to determine whether the market has new fundamental support.
In my view, the main risks remain user adoption, privacy security, and token value capture. The small number of Privacy Pool participants limits the actual anonymity set. Some new components have not yet been audited, and the Entrypoint can still be upgraded. Growth in product usage also does not necessarily translate directly into value for the ZC token.
In addition, if interest in Snowmoon and Vitalik-related topics cools down before external user growth picks up, ZC could return to being a narrative trade heavily dependent on market sentiment.
My core view: ZC has completed the first step from a literary concept to an actual product. The recent public mention and product connection with zkmoney represent an important development in moving from team-driven validation toward external attention.
However, it has not yet demonstrated that real user demand has reached a meaningful scale.
The first wave traded the story of Vitalik and Snowmoon. For the next stage to support a more sustained market revaluation, the key requirement is real growth in product usage.
The most important things to watch next are whether Privacy Pool deposits grow from a few dozen to dozens or even hundreds, whether wallets outside the team continue to use Zip, Unzip, and Burn to Speak, and whether ZipTeller can generate stable external payment activity.
External attention is the catalyst. Real user growth is the core variable for ZC’s next stage.
Chart: https://t.co/xxZghXJkuQ
BREAKING: President Trump says he will now give a $5,000 “Trump Dividend” to every US citizen if Republicans win the midterms, rather than just US adults.
On September 9th, President Trump said that only US adults would qualify for the $5,000 payment.
There are ~316 million US citizens, meaning the payments would total ~$1.58 trillion.
That is +$350 billion more than the previous proposal.
XDP (Base): 0x092f3944360a1093aee326941e7494104f533f70
AGL (Ethereum): 0x63401cdd577478f9389a1683e866a937f072d1c2
Check the pool before the chart. Look up any token, free →
https://t.co/whg68fKXr0
Our latest research paper explores the growing connection between AI and digital assets and explains why broad AI adoption may drive new demand, utility and applications across the digital asset economy. https://t.co/z5T88Orble