@theveindoc Migration a contributing factor, along with unrealistic interview point scoring and no significant increase in posts. However even in training it’s getting longer and more complicated.
Surely you can understand how if the negatives don’t apply to you, it affects your opinion?
@theveindoc Yes you have been consistent. And so have many others, in that we think you’re mistaken. It’s very easy for you, on your boomer historic living costs and final salary pension to make these statements. It’s not your job they’re replacing is it.
@pottypilgrim@campbellclaret I can disagree vehemently with his conduct and Iraq intervention previously. But I do agree with this assessment of reform, tice and Zia in particular. Hate him/ignore him all you like, I don’t think he’s wrong here.
@WeeThePeePill@RichardDawkins I really am not qualified to judge the work. But I can judge Nathan’s other opinions some of which come across as concerning.
@newsnewsnews911@DrNeilStone@DrJBhattacharya I’ve been jabbed twice I think. After that I felt the risk benefit ratio was tilting towards not getting anymore. And that’s what all of this is about, accepting that everything you do has risk, and trying to ascertain which option has benefits that outweigh that risk.
@newsnewsnews911@DrNeilStone@DrJBhattacharya I’m all about the evidence. But I think you’ve been susceptible to confirmation bias where anything agreeing with your world view becomes accepted. True skepticism is looking at the evidence for your position and critiquing it to a high degree. Which I’m not sure you have done.
@DugganByrampark@GBPolitcs No its an excellent standard, within reason. I just don’t think it’s a legitimate reason to hound someone to their death. And I don’t really get with MLK has to do with anything, I was curious in the manner which you brought it up. Almost implying he deserved what happened to him