Jack Hm

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

Novak is the most complete player in tennis. He can attack, defend, rally, transition, pattern construct, serve, everything—all while being the best in them all

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Aleeexanderrrrr Elite baseliners were destroying these guys, that's how they disappeared. I think you are either clueless or are extremely stupid, or chances are both

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@454545221vj7f @GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Also, Safin, Hewitt, Puerta, Baghdatis, Roddick, Phillipousis, Gonzalez were miles better than prime Federer, because they won slams from 1999-2003, while Federer did not. Federer was their bunny too. Federer was 20-23 in his prime

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@454545221vj7f @GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Federer was #1 #2 or #3 when he was the bunny of Zverev, Thiem, Tsitsipas, Rublev. Federer was 33-37 in his prime Raonic, Thiem, Ruud, Anderson, Daniil, Tsitsipas, Zverev, Rublev, Felix were miles better than prime Federer.

[Danny @DjokovicFan_]

Wimbledon 2019 final. Final set tiebreak at 12-12 (5-3).

Novak Djokovic hits arguably the most important shot in tennis history.

Commentator: “That backhand down the line. That might be the shot of the decade.”

Legendary mental strength.

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@454545221vj7f @GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Also, Safin, Hewitt, Puerta, Baghdatis, Roddick, Phillipousis, Gonzalez were way better than prime Federer, because they won slams from 1999-2003, while Federer did not. Federer was their bunny too.
Federer was 20-23 in his prime

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@454545221vj7f @GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Sinner was Zverev, Daniil, Tsitsipas, Rublev, Novak, Felix's bunny before 2024. It's a well-known fact that players don't reach their prime at 17-18, most not even until 23-24

Fed, Rafa, Thiem, Murray, Delpo were all prime. How did Novak at 33-37 beat Zverev, Daniil then?

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@454545221vj7f @GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ No player has started winning tournaments from their very first grand slam match.. They need to reach prime. Federer couldn't even beat qualifiers until 2003-04. Fedal doesn't have that excuse. Rafa is just 1 year older than Novak, and made his pro-debut 2 yrs prior.

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@NavyWarriors @DjokovicFan_ @Not_markl So how did he play all these clay matches, winning the most in the history of the sport? Clay is the hardest surface on the body - since you have played the sport =, you can enlighten us maybe?

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@dixon_csgo @GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Damn true

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@GhorT77938 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Tsitsipas and Medvedev were better than Rafa, Federer, Thiem, and Sinner - so it's not Novak's fault.
Federer and Rafa won against Roddick, Baghdatis, Phillipousis, Puerta, Gonzalez btw their whole career

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Vinayyuvi55 @DjokovicFan_ @Not_markl What about hard court?
Novak did not reach his prime until 2011, and made his pro-debut 2 years after Rafa made his

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@NavyWarriors @DjokovicFan_ @Not_markl The last surface you can play any matches with an injury is clay. But Nadal not only played but won most clay matches in his life, beating everyone in his path. That shows it wasn't an injury at all

[Danny @DjokovicFan_]

Players who beat Nadal the most times on clay:

🇷🇸Djokovic 9
🇦🇹Thiem 4
🇦🇷Gaudio 3
🇮🇹Fognini 3
🇨🇭Federer 2
🇬🇧Murray 2
🇪🇸Ferrer 2
🇩🇪Zverev 2

And the only player to defeat Nadal 3 times at Roland Garros.

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Rakesh89847335 @Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Who was fit? Murray didn't win a slam until 2012. Stan not until 2014. Cilic not until 2014.
The era was so weak that teens dominated, not because they were fit.
Rafa outside of clay won only 2 slams until 2010 (when he reached prime - and was finally capable of winning 3 slams)

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Yes, the world has seen and knows the truth. Novak had it the toughest and hardest among the Big 3. His 24 slams are worth 40.

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Not_markl @DjokovicFan_ Novak definitely had it harder in every sense. Nadal was literally winning clay slams in his teens (while failing on other surfaces) because the competition was dogshit from 2000-07

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Betty_A_Scott @Not_markl @Zwxsh Because hard courts everyone can play, anyone can win it
Clay is different - only clay courters who are specialist on it win most of the time. It's reality

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Reikyuo @Not_markl @Zwxsh Novak's 24 slams is much tougher than anyone else whatever they achieved, despite the health issues, injuries, constant negative circumstances, press, media he was constantly under, tougher era that he managed to win under...
There is no one greater than 🐐Novak to play tennis.

[Jack Hm @hm_jack8965]

@Reikyuo @Not_markl @Zwxsh 🤣😃🤣 Your delusion is funny. He could not be a professional player but he could win 22 slams, and 14 on clay? 🤡😅😂
Mate, try your trolling and scamming anywhere else.