HMAL007

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@frank_rosh Oh I got this one of wet wipe

[IAmSage 🇨🇦🍁🇨🇦 @SageKnowsAll]

@RoyaNikkhah @thetimes @HugoCDaniel So the white, divorced bride is allowed to wear white and a veil for her second wedding

But Meghan, a biracial divorced bride was given hell by the palace when she wanted to wear white and a veil to her second wedding.

The royal family will NEVER beat the racist allegations.

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@dennydenton3 @harpersbazaarus Perfect then 🤣

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@RoyaNikkhah @thetimes Of course he will, then he's kissing the faces off them at petes wedding 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@GBNEWS Oh dicky fitz, do you actually get embarrassed with the crap that comes out of your mouth, I mean how old are you, don't forget YOU TOLD LIES , about an interview you didn't see or hear 😉 well I suppose it is gbnews were talking about, so yeah, lickspittle

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@brewerelac I don't think they even put a message out , despicable

[Quinn @Mikeedakid1]

Correcting the Record — Royal Edition

The Royal Family’s Real Estate Problem Is Apparently Less Interesting Than Harry’s Mortgage

For years we’ve been told that Prince Harry’s finances are somehow a matter of national importance.

His mortgage.

His Netflix deal.

His book deal.

His speaking engagements.

His security costs.

His business ventures.

If Harry buys a house, it’s news.

If Harry refinances a house, it’s news.

If Harry sneezes near a bank, somebody in the British press is probably writing a story about it.

We’ve watched years of headlines dissecting every dollar the Duke of Sussex earns, spends, borrows, saves, or invests.

And yet somehow, when questions arise about royal housing arrangements, peppercorn rents, royal property deals, and who benefits from them, the volume suddenly gets turned way down.

Funny how that works.

Recent reporting has raised fresh questions about Prince Andrew’s ability to generate income from subletting cottages connected to Royal Lodge while benefiting from a peppercorn-rent arrangement.

Now let’s be clear.

This isn’t about claiming wrongdoing where none has been proven.

It’s about asking why certain financial stories receive relentless scrutiny while others seem to receive a fraction of the attention.

Because if we’re going to talk about money, let’s talk about all of it.

If we’re going to talk about accountability, let’s apply it equally.

If we’re going to ask questions, let’s ask them of everyone.

What makes this so absurd is that Harry no longer receives funding from the Sovereign Grant.

He doesn’t receive public money to support his lifestyle.

He lives in California.

He earns his own income.

He pays his own bills.

Yet somehow his mortgage has become one of the British media’s favorite long-running soap operas.

Meanwhile, stories involving royal estates, royal properties, royal housing privileges, and long-standing financial arrangements often seem to generate significantly less outrage.

Why?

Why is a private citizen’s mortgage more interesting than questions involving royal property arrangements?

Why is Harry’s bank account endlessly fascinating while other financial questions are treated like awkward family business nobody wants to discuss?

The answer might make some people uncomfortable.

Because for years, Harry and Meghan Sussex have been the industry’s most reliable source of clicks, outrage, engagement, television segments, YouTube videos, and newspaper traffic.

Their finances get examined under a microscope.

Everyone else’s finances often get treated with a magnifying glass left in the drawer.

That’s not balance.

That’s not consistency.

And it sure as hell isn’t equal scrutiny.

If the media wants to investigate royal money, investigate royal money.

All of it.

Not just the parts involving the couple you’ve built an entire cottage industry around attacking.

Because from where I’m sitting, the question was never really Harry’s mortgage.

The question is why some people keep counting Harry’s pockets while looking the other way when the spotlight lands a little closer to the palace gates.

Funny as hell how that works.

[Shannon 👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨💞 @Shannon79053723]

Apparently milk is being served at the reception instead of 🍾

Imported all the way from China, no less. 😂 🥛

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@TheOnlyDuchess6 Why you worried 😟

[Kima 💜 @KIMA0330]

So let me see if I understand, if you're not a "working royal" you can have security, a house owned by the Crown, use your HRH title, do charity work, and do whatever you want to earn money, UNLESS you're Harry and Meghan 🤔Got it? I wonder what the non-racist reason for this is

[#NotMyKing @NoKingCharlie]

Greed will get them in the end

[Baroness Bruck @BaronessBruck]

Wait, didn’t the media tell us how Tough #Tantrum Willy, who is “running the show” “behind the scenes” had banned Beatrice & Eugenie from showing their faces in public alongside the Family⁉️🤡🎪🤷🏻‍♀️

What happened with that⁉️🤭

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@Babster1 @khtigers Just plain nasty jealous #itches , they can't see past their own noses, pathetic 😒

[K D 💙🌼🌻🪷🌹 @karend0609]

I see this only applied to Meghan.

Waiting for the uproar on a divorcee wearing white.

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@RoyaNikkhah @thetimes @HugoCDaniel Just as I thought you, yes, you roya had to mention H&M, sad are you not just teeny, weeny bit embarrassed 🙄

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@Telegraph Why is she scowling

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@DailyMailUK Lies being the right word 😏

[Henry VIII @SussexHenryVIII]

The big pro-royalty Reddit sub which has spent literal years bitching about every breath Harry & Meghan take, screaming about non-working royalty…

Have decided the rents thing is fine because the York girls have done nothing wrong.

It’s just endless hypocrisy.

[HMAL007 @hmal007]

@dennydenton3 She is crazy 🤪 I'm blocked 🚫 think I mentioned jimmy saville too often 🤷

[Snarky Guy @Barbara27541025]

@Independent The whole institution is rotten and corrupt